Originally posted by KyoZero
So essentially us folks who enjoy sexual images aren't up to your level of intelligence and sentience?
That is sure what it sounds like to me with statements of that manner
You normally make some intelligent and thought out posts...but this is not worthy of your gifts.
I for one,am not interested in this type of manipulation or guilt transference....or your insecurities before people who think or value differently
than do you. I do not maneuver that easily.
There are people out here who are not interested in the sexual template of which the OP describes and are wont to speak out so. Why would that cause
you to try to defend your position with such ham handed strategy. If you want to enjoy such images ..bon appetit.
There are simply those of us out here who do not approve of such methods or thinking and are wont to speak out so. Why would this give offense ..in a
difference of opinion?? Can it be that some of us are not as tolerant as we might claim...or advertise?? Can it also be that some of us have the idea
implanted in us from somewhere ..that we are sitting on the only one in town?? That we are somehow more entitled..because we are or think ourselves
This is also to what I was alluding to the OP in my statement about the avatars are often very misleading.
I like the female form as much as any man..out here. I just like it in the privacy of my home not constantly bombarded by it everywhere I go and
especially to get into my wallet.
reply to post by Kilgore Trout
...but has anyone else noticed some of the adverts...for role playing games with unnaturally endowed women or for lingerie and weight loss
etc etc...my own rather meager chest embellishments find those a little intimidating and unnecessary.
I feel compelled to tell you that not all of us out here like big breasted women. Some of us find them not interesting at all. Some of us out here
also know that it takes much much more than breasts to make and define a woman.
Someone on another site made a comment to me about this woman who passed away some time back..also her son. I think her name was Smith..Anna Smith.
Blonde Big breasted. I found her program to be very uninteresting when she was plastered on my television screen and I was quite happy I had a remote
It is the same with this family Kardishan..or whatever this group is. Not interested. If this is entertainment ...alot of people are desperate. THey
are not blondes but nonetheless...not interested in this.
It is the same with this place..called Hooters. I have never been there nor am I making plans to go. I dont appreciate this kind of appeal to get me
to come off my moneys. My moneys come to hard earned to be made merchandize of in such a manner..by anyone.
As I have stated many times....I like the female form as well as the next man..but some ways it is advertised is just nonsense to me. I dont find it
difficult to get women to take off their clothes or advertise their wares.
I once again ..agree with Whitewave concerning the value of a thing or concept and not cheapening it.
THere is a concept or idea in economics that something of value is kept and not marketed all over the place or it will lose its value in the
marketplace. It is a concept called economic scarcity raises value.
If you market something all over the place..even to very very young people to get into their pocketbooks or the pocktebooks of their parents...it will
begin to lose its value. Eventually the people themselves will lose their value and simply become objects...as people unthinkingly consume each
other......thinking this is entirely normal..even warranted....entitled.
You can tell this entitlement by the reaction to the few out here who are want to think from a different view on this topic.
Nonetheless..I encourage you to not be intimated by these so called endowments of these advertisements. They are very overrated.
My thanks to all for their posts.
[edit on 25-7-2009 by orangetom1999]