It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by king9072
A young boy walks out of a store, the owner quickly catches up and feels the young man may have stolen some items. He asks the boy “do you mind emptying your pockets?”. If the boy has not stolen anything, he would quickly empty his pockets confirming his innocence. But, if the boy has stolen something, he will do whatever he possibly can to avoid a search.
Originally posted by jfj123
What if the boy simply doesn't want to be searched....Unreasonable search and seizure ya know?
posted by Seventh
I mean come on, it`s a fair chance that everyone has seen the site of a serious crime before and what happens, it`s cordoned off and forensic experts are there for days if not weeks sifting through the minutest of particles looking for clues, how many huge court cases have ended in guilty or not guilty solely on the support of forensic evidence.
Originally posted by Mark_Amy
I wonder what the odds are for one building collapsing neatly at virtual freefall speed into its own footprint due to fire?
Given that, I wonder what the odds are for 3 buildings in the same complex collapsing neatly at virtual freefall speed into their own footprints due to fire on the same day?
I would like to ask debunkers, why is there a demand for controlled demolition companies all around the world if just a fire can bring down a building symmetrically at virtual freefall speeed into its own footprint?
posted by king9072
How anyone can believe that fires in one portion of any steel structured building could cause uniform, and complete structural failure, to allow almost free fall descent speed - is beyond me.
posted by paraphi
I guess you are not a structural engineer! The properties of steel changes when subjected to heat and the effect of collapse in one area would have a cascade effect. I am not structural engineer myself,
Originally posted by trueforger
Never bought the officious sounding lie.That evidence,the steel,was lost to us when chain of custody was broken.The analogy of the little boy is apt as he was a minor,unaccompanied with less rights than a man,mr contractor.