Originally posted by TheColdDragon
I submit to you the following link.
My question stands and remains, while there are some uncorroborated claims that are popular in the mainstream, there are OTHER corroborations which
have more legitimacy as to their accuracy.
So, it still stands;
Where did the Molten Steel come from?
Your mincing words here and your supporting the CT perspective really.
Your question is as follows: "They say that there was molten steel found, yet the CT people believe that the fire was not hot enough to melt the
That's the entire problem for the official theory.
The office fire could not have gotten hot to melt it. Especially in the diagonal fashion that was apparent that day.
To get an idea of what I mean view the following photo www.debunking911.com...
Now, you further stated that this "molten metal" was found weeks after the attack. That's yet another issue, considering the fires alone were not
hot enough to melt the steel in the first place, let alone 80 floors below the impact zone and in the basements. The basements was where the majority
of the molten metal was found.
Numerous first response firefighters claimed the liquid metal was "running like in a foundry".
Additionally, as previously stated thermal imaging showed hot spots of upto 2000 degrees fehrenheit weeks after the collapse.
Yet kerosene burns at maximum of 1400, and the office fires even lower temperatures than that.
So you tell me, how did the molten metal get there - according to the official story?
Well, as of right now, it has never been explained. But since nanothermite has been found, a compound which CAN melt metal, DOES melt metal, and was
FOUND in abundant supply in the ground zero dust.
I am gonna take the option that has all the arrows pointing to it.
EDIT: To show both sides, you can view the "debunking article" that the above molten cut metal comes from
Two things to note:
1. This article was written BEFORE peer reviewed scientific journal was released stating that nano thermite has been discovered in every dust sample
studied from the world trade center.
2. They simply attribute these cuts to "worker cleanup"...
But, what they fail to aknowledge through the entire article is. Where did all the molten metal come from?
Thats the ultimate question here. The official story can't account for it, the debunkers can't account for it. But thermite can, and coincidentally
enough - it was found.
[edit on 22-7-2009 by king9072]