Please read and understand everything I write before writing a response, too many times in the past I end up repeating myself
several times in my thread. If you need to, please read the thread several times before posting comments or questions. Thanks. *Important*
An Important Distinction
Too often, as our society always does, we begin to divide ourselves against each other. Though we often share the same goals, we continually let
ourselves be divided and conquered. And this is evident within the 911 movement. The truth movement is continually divided so that it can easily be
conquered through ridicule and false science. Fellow members of the movement will argue endlessly about points that will likely never be proven either
way, all while they let the goal of exposure slip away.
Always remember, there is only two sides here, you are one or the other.
You are either a person who does not believe the Official story, or you are a person that does believe the official story. That is the ONLY thing that
matters. It doesn't matter if you believe there was no planes, or that I believe that there was planes, if we both agree that the official story is
nonsensical. Through this division we are conquered, and we need to end that here, because we all have a common goal. When responding to this thread,
I want you to begin by making this distinction prior to any comments. Either “I believe the official story (insert comment)” or, “I do not
believe the official story (insert comment)”
Another... Important Distinction
Many people seem to think that it is on the truth movement, to prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that the Government was involved. This is FALSE. It is
NOT on us to prove that, and it is definitely not possible for us to prove that entirely. Through this false mind set, we limit ourselves from ever
making any true headway. Our only goal is to prove that it did not happen the way they said it did, and through that fact we can understand that they
must have done it, because only the guilty must lie in explanation.
A young boy walks out of a store, the owner quickly catches up and feels the young man may have stolen some items. He asks the boy “do you mind
emptying your pockets?”. If the boy has not stolen anything, he would quickly empty his pockets confirming his innocence. But, if the boy has stolen
something, he will do whatever he possibly can to avoid a search.
So why the anecdote? Because it illustrates exactly what we DO need to prove in this movement. We don't need to know what the boy stole, or why the
boy stole, we don't even need to prove how he stole. We just need to listen to him do everything possible to avoid that search, because even if you
don't know or cant prove all the variables, we still know based on his unwillingness to allow a search, and the fact that he is lying, prove his
In essence, I can't prove 100% why the government conducted 911, though I have some ideas. Or exactly how, everything was accomplished, though I have
some ideas. But what can be proven is that their story does not add up, and because of that I know they are guilty, because if they were innocent
their story would add up and they would have done everything in their power to divulge every piece of information. It's the unknown, and currently
– unprovable, variables that are derailing this movement.
It's why we still have people on this forum, who believe in a completely illogical and outright blasphemous version of events that day. And with that
view, they base their life, making decisions, building their perception, and influencing the way they act and interpret new information. It is
dangerous. Because it's through this ignorant perception, that people allow illogical and threatening laws to be passed, wars to be launched, people
to be murdered, and countries destroyed.
We must use undisputed facts, inconsistencies in the official version, and highlight the astronomical coincidences to make our point.
911 was a classic Problem, Reaction, Solution event. To help illustrate this point, even before the Problem (911) was created, the Solution, had
already been formulated. Like the fact that "Game plan to remove al-Qaeda from the
face of the Earth" is on Bush's desk September 9th, 2001.
This game plan includes invasion plans for Afghanistan. Which “coincidentally” would be the first illegal war launched based solely on the fact
that the Problem (911) was created. The reaction to the problem, always allows the solution – no matter how ludicrous it may seem.
You show me one reporter, one commentator, one member of Congress who thought we should invade Afghanistan before September 11 and I'll buy you
dinner in the best restaurant in New York City."
- Sandy Berger, Clinton's National Security Adviser
To be truthful about it, there was no way we could have got the public consent to have suddenly launched a campaign on Afghanistan but for what
happened on September 11.
- Prime Minister Tony Blair
It's time for people to understand that there are no coincidences in the grand scheme of this world. Failing to understand that fact seriously limits
your ability to evaluate the current state of your reality. You are limiting your perception. Especially since, these coincidences are absolutely
A brief moment for another astronomical event. If you think it is a coincidence that the English secret service, with a company of 1000+ officers,
were conducting a terror drill based on a scenario in which the exact same targets, would be attacked at the exact same stations, at the exact same
time, you are absolutely oblivious to reality. That is an astronomical coincidence. Through this Problem, they created a Reaction from the people, and
implemented their Solution of expanded police state, and war on terrorism. In the process, removing rights, destroying lives, and misleading the
Another Problem, Reaction, Solution (PRS), event was Swine Flu. I spoke out against it immediately, and stood fast while hysteria gripped this forum
and our society. What you were witnessing was the Reaction, to a Problem that the Media had created so that the powers could implement a solution.
We wont know exactly how devastating the vaccines are until 100's of millions have taken them, that will be this winter. But, we can already see that
the WHO has been granted sweeping powers, through the use of a media hyped “Pandemic Level”, and vaccine manufacturers have already been given
So that when people start
showing up maimed, sick, dying or dead. They have no legal recourse against toxic vaccines.
“This is a 911 topic, why talk about swine flu?”
Because it highlights the exact same scam that was used with 911. The solution, is always worse than the original problem. But since their solution
has been allowed due to peoples reaction, to a completely fabricated problem, it is acceptable. Where as, prior to the problem, people would have
never accepted the solution.
Is it a coincidence that the “Pentagon Attack” happened to hit the
only section designed to take such a hit?
Is it a coincidence that the hijacker, was so nice to go out of his way to attack that portion, rather than any other portion? Going so far as to
execute almost an entire downward circle, to avoid all pentagon brass stationed directly on the opposite side of the building. Just a coincidence?
Is it a coincidence that 3 steel structured towers collapsed into themselves on 911, yet it has never happened before or since? How does a fire, a
jet, a bomb, or anything which compromises less than 10% of a steel structure, some how cause a unilateral, complete systematic failure?
Is it a coincidence that some how, for the first time in history that day, we had almost two entire planes vaporize? Such as in
or at the
. It must be merely a
coincidence, that these two planes practically disappeared. And in the Pentagon attack, it is simply a coincidence that the wings did no damage to the
exterior of the building, nor did the engines, before they were 'sucked' into the building and vaporized. Riiiight.
Is it a coincidence or simply amazing luck, that
Silverstein purchased the WTC complex 6 weeks prior to 911
It is especially convenient, since purchasing the WTC's were theoretically the worst business move in history. The towers were a black hole, that
were only a burden. It was losing money hand over fist, and the cost of needed renovations were staggering. It would be cheaper to rebuild the towers,
than to go through purchasing them.
It's just a coincidence, that he profited to the tune of
on a six week investment which cost him
out of pocket.
Thus, it must also be coincidence, that he happened to miss a very important meeting in the World Trade Center that day due to his wife
“demanding” he see his dermatologist.
CONTINUED NEXT POST.
[edit on 19-7-2009 by king9072]