Socialism, communism and capitalism are all oppressive ideologies., page 2
Pages: <<  1    2  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 2 times


reply posted on 19-7-2009 @ 10:48 AM by Solomons
reply to post by average_expert



Capitalism did not cause the global financial crisis,capitalism has not existed for quite some time.Plus the financial crisis was intentional anyway....


reply posted on 31-7-2009 @ 12:34 AM by Frankidealist35
reply to post by Skyfloating



That is not what I'm talking about. I'm not talking about free enterprise. I'm not talking about the freedom of exchange. I think you misunderstand my post.

What I'm saying... is that like with me I am a true believer in the free market. I just don't think on the other hand- that- all of society should be based around it.

If you have a society based on any one ideological system- your society becomes completely oppressive.

Like it's with capitalism- it's a good system of exchange and good for the market... but if everything is based on being a slave... then what good is that?

Do you get my drift?



reply posted on 31-7-2009 @ 12:36 AM by Frankidealist35
reply to post by John Matrix



It is my personal opinion that capitalism and the free market should only be applied to when talking about the market itself. Freedom is good. Okay. I can go with that.

The problem is when you start letting all of these business entrepeneurs take over every aspect of your life. You let them brainwash you. And all that jazz.

It's just as bad with that as it is with you letting the government and public education brainwash you.

I think though- that- what we need is for people to realize that these are just economic systems, and, that as a society we can pretty much interact with each other however we want to. I think the problem is that people attribute these ideologies to how they feel society should be.


reply posted on 31-7-2009 @ 12:39 AM by dragonridr
reply to post by Frankidealist35



I had a professor with a great reply once:

A socialist is someone who believes the government should take care of them.A communist is someone who wishes they wouldn't.And a capitalist is someone who knows they cant.


reply posted on 31-7-2009 @ 05:26 AM by azazel420
reply to post by Frankidealist35



I disagree with your original post (didn't read the rest of the thread as it's late). I don't think that any of the 3 systems are inherently oppressive. All 3 can be made to work well given the right people in charge. I think what your seeing is more the oppressive nature of the governments who run all 3 systems.

Communism can be highly effective in small close-knit groups (small farming collectives have be a necessity at times where 1 bad crop could ruin you financially without the support of a larger group).

Socialism can be highly effective if you are dedicated to it, have a well thought out system and a very closed immigration policy.

Capitalism can be highly effective if you are committed to it, reward real innovation and don't fall into bail-out traps (rewarding unfit financial structures by keeping them on life support).

Bad government can oppress you under any economic system though, so in a sense you are right.


reply posted on 4-8-2009 @ 12:06 PM by LittlePinky82
Originally posted by Frankidealist35
Socialism- workers rule everything, you are all equally poor, you get what you want. In socialism however there would be no freedom because everything would be owned by the state.

Under communism- everything is owned by everyone. You have no reason to produce any more stuff because you're done working. You become lazy, and, a bunch of slobs.

Under capitalism- you must work. Work is your freedom. You produce stuff with working.

None of the ideologies takes into account all of the workers needs, nor, that of the employers.

They're all oppressive ideologies.

When will people recognize this?



Oh good grief. As a communist I'm going to chime in. Socialism is the transition phase from one government to a communist government. There's a saying in communism: each according to his needs, each according to his ability.

You're spreading a myth. In communism everyone isn't treated equal. Everyone is given the same opportunities. It's up to you to take those opportunities and use them. Nobody can force you to go after a job or a promotion. But you are given the same opportunity whether you're the Queen of England or the poorest person in the country. If you have all the requirements you deserve a shot. What's this # about not producing? You produce for still for the good of the people and the community. You work together as a team. If someone needs a new house people who want to help build it will build it. When will you realize you don't know # about communism or socialism?


reply posted on 4-8-2009 @ 12:08 PM by LittlePinky82
Originally posted by Solomons
reply to
post by average_expert



Capitalism did not cause the global financial crisis,capitalism has not existed for quite some time.Plus the financial crisis was intentional anyway....


If people of today read Adam Smith he'd be called a commie.


reply posted on 4-8-2009 @ 12:12 PM by LittlePinky82
Originally posted by dragonridr
reply to
post by Frankidealist35



I had a professor with a great reply once:

A socialist is someone who believes the government should take care of them.A communist is someone who wishes they wouldn't.And a capitalist is someone who knows they cant.


Sorry but that professor is full of # where communism is concerned.



reply posted on 4-8-2009 @ 12:14 PM by LittlePinky82
Originally posted by azazel420
reply to
post by Frankidealist35



I disagree with your original post (didn't read the rest of the thread as it's late). I don't think that any of the 3 systems are inherently oppressive. All 3 can be made to work well given the right people in charge. I think what your seeing is more the oppressive nature of the governments who run all 3 systems.

Communism can be highly effective in small close-knit groups (small farming collectives have be a necessity at times where 1 bad crop could ruin you financially without the support of a larger group).

Socialism can be highly effective if you are dedicated to it, have a well thought out system and a very closed immigration policy.

Capitalism can be highly effective if you are committed to it, reward real innovation and don't fall into bail-out traps (rewarding unfit financial structures by keeping them on life support).

Bad government can oppress you under any economic system though, so in a sense you are right.


I saw a great news report not too long ago (maybe a year or so) of a town in China with a small population that was doing Maoism. It seemed to work quite well for them. One person was saying she wanted to join the community but I think something with their moving rules in China kept her from doing so (so not the town itself fault I don't think). Democratic Socialism has worked for a lot of Scandinavian countries. Personally I would say Sweden is a Democratic Socialist state but that's just me. They might not consider themselves that.
Pages: <<  1    2  >>    ^^TOP^^



Why my mind is closing towards Capitalism
  Posted 10 days ago with 78 member flags
Hippy Do-Gooders have Destroyed the World
  Posted 11 days ago with 23 member flags
Facts About Socialism
  Posted 2 days ago with 23 member flags
Are Liberals REALLY More Intelligent Than Conservatives?
  Posted 7 days ago with 18 member flags
The "Occupy are Socialists," Megathread
  Posted 11 days ago with 8 member flags
Unpopular Opinions: Say NO to Human Rights
  Posted 5 days ago with 7 member flags
This is what needs to happen: REVOLUTION!
  Posted 13 days ago with 5 member flags
Strange sounds warn us of incoming, and very soon...
  Posted 7 days ago with 3 member flags