Originally posted by ReelView
The bottom line is there is not court with real jurisdiction to hear this case. The judge if cornered will call his court a statutory court or let you
believe it's a maritime court or call it an article I court but it's just another name for fantasy. There are only 2 criminal courts defined as
lawful in the constitution and the constitution also guarantees you the right to know what court you are in. Your ticket is the claim of a fictional
crime handled by a fictional court. The Constitution allows only two criminal courts, maritime and common law.
Stop the cop audio - www.freedom-school.com...
This is absolutely true, educate yourself and fight this injustice. There is always a remedy in the law, and friends, statutes are are not laws, they
are rules agreed on by a legislature, or a group. There are no laws above the Constitution, and under Common Law you can only break the law by hurting
someone, or, harming another's property, or being untruthful in your contracts. Here are two good sites to learn about such things...
You all have a choice; either know the law, or be a victim of the law. A Freemen on the Land is not bound by statutory laws, and cannot be prosecuted
More Freedom Sites
Our American Common Law
The Lieber Code of 1863
(INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE GOVERNMENT OF ARMIES OF THE UNITED STATES IN THE FIELD.)
Privacy Act of 1974
An Enemy of the State
Promoting lawful Constitutional government in these united States of America
U.S. Constitution Online
There is law. Irrefutable and permanently applicable law which, as a peaceful
individual is unlikely to ever affect you. It is called Common Law. Provided
you keep the peace, do not cause injury, harm or loss to another individual;
then you will remain within the terms of Common Law and will not break it.
Common Law is treating others as you would be treated. Common Law was
developed by British people so they could settle their differences peacefully
Common Law incorporates the Charter of Liberties (1100). The Charter
makes the Sovereign subject to the law and affirms that no person is above
Common Law includes the Council of Westminster (1102), which ended
slavery in England.
Common Law protects the right established in the Petition of Right (1627)
that no person can be arrested for disagreeing with the government.
Common Law defends your property rights, your right to self-defence and
your right to be secure in your own home - your home is your castle.
Common Law establishes every person's right to a jury trial and the freedom
of juries to declare a person innocent. If a jury believes that a person has been
charged under an unjust law, it has the right to acquit. For this reason
Common Law is superior to the statute law created by Parliament.
(In the 17th century the Lord Chief Justice ruled that juries have an
inalienable right to freely decide guilt and innocence.)
Common Law plainly states that judges are to be guided by precedent - the
rulings of previous cases. They are not to make up the law. Where there is no
precedent, Common Law dictates that decisions must be made according to
principles of fairness recognized by Common Law.
In one sentence Common Law Principles that underlines this forum are:
Do not cause injury, harm or loss to another individual
It is important to realize that a Statute in and of itself is not a law de jure, but merely de facto. It is a legislated rule of a society which has
been given the force of law, by consent of the governed. There is speculation as to whether consent of the governed is given by the democratic
process, or whether it is required in each individual case - such as by contracting with courts or police officers, whether directly or indirectly.
(here's your proof)
The point is that there are no courts set up to have the jurisdiction under EITHER Natural Laws or Common Law (even if there is any difference between
This was the job of the "Justice of the Peace," of which there is no more. That leaves the County Sheriff and the Notary Public as your only law
representatives. A Criminal Courts Judge cannot legally sit on a Civil Case, or a Traffic Violation case, and you remain on "dry land" until you
open your mouth to admit that you are the "PERSON" they wish to charge. When you admit this, you leave dry land and board an Admiralty ship, and are
now under their law.
All the courts are set up to operate under Commercial Codes/Statutes ... and there is a mega difference between these and 'justice'. And that's the
point that matters.
So to claim Common Law (or 'justice') jurisdiction is quite enough to confuse them anyway (we are finding)
One last thing...is your police officer a Peace Officer, or a Law Enforcer?