Clinton: US Won't Hesitate to Use Military Against Iran, page 1
Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 4 times
Topic started on 16-7-2009 @ 05:49 PM by Frankidealist35

Clinton: US Won't Hesitate to Use Military Against Iran


news.antiwar.com
In a high-profile policy address before the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), Secretary of State Hillary Clinton declared that the US wouldn’t not hesitate to use its military to “defend our friends, our interests, and above all, our people” during the segment discussing Iran.

She elaborated on the declaration with “this is not an option we seek nor is it a threat; it is a promise.” Clinton also warned Iran that the US offer to hold talks, which she had previously said she didn’t expect to work to begin with, would not be open-ended and that “our willingness to talk is not a
(visit the link for the full news article)


reply posted on 16-7-2009 @ 05:59 PM by Aggie Man
reply to post by Frankidealist35



I seem to recall hearing something differently than you. I recall Barack extending the table of diplomacy...even wrote Iranan leader a letter...He has tried more than Bush did, that's for sure. I think it's a bit premature for him to walk away from that offer right now...but it cant be an open-ended offer either.


reply posted on 16-7-2009 @ 06:02 PM by Frankidealist35
reply to post by Aggie Man



I heard about that. I even said in my OP that Obama doesn't seem to be on the same page with the rest of his administration. I think that the rest of the administration should be open to talks as well. It just seems that I've noticed a bit of infighting with the Obama administration here. Barack Obama has said he wanted to talk to Ahmajenidad, and, talk to Iran. While, you have these other people on the other part of his administration calling for war with Iran, or, saying they won't hesitate to go to war with Iran. It makes you wonder if they're on the same page or not.


reply posted on 16-7-2009 @ 06:37 PM by Aggie Man
Originally posted by Frankidealist35
reply to
post by Aggie Man



I heard about that. I even said in my OP that Obama doesn't seem to be on the same page with the rest of his administration. I think that the rest of the administration should be open to talks as well. It just seems that I've noticed a bit of infighting with the Obama administration here. Barack Obama has said he wanted to talk to Ahmajenidad, and, talk to Iran. While, you have these other people on the other part of his administration calling for war with Iran, or, saying they won't hesitate to go to war with Iran. It makes you wonder if they're on the same page or not.


Very true! I wonder how long Hillary will last? Seems to me she has her own agenda and speaks "out of turn" w/o the approval of Obama.


reply posted on 16-7-2009 @ 06:44 PM by Frankidealist35
reply to post by Aggie Man



Or perhaps, there is an NWO agenda here at play and Obama isn't fully up to speed? Barack Obama seems to be up to speed about how to implement the government take over of our economy and get the masses to support him, but, it seems like these other people seem to be one step ahead of him on the globalist agenda. It is comments like this from Hillary Clinton and top ranking US officials in our government that make you realize that not all is what it seems. Wouldn't you agree?



reply posted on 16-7-2009 @ 07:27 PM by Frankidealist35
reply to post by Jamiethegreat





I'm glad you're not the President!

Do you even know what the diplomatic consequences of doing that would entail?


reply posted on 16-7-2009 @ 07:43 PM by ProtoplasmicTraveler
The notion of a pre-emptive war as ever being 'just' or 'wise' is really just saying..."All we are saying is let's not give peace a chance"

It's funny in the past Decade Israel has attacked multiple peoples and nations, and the United States has attacked multiple people and nations while Iran has attacked absolutely no one, but we really somehow want to believe Iran is a threat based on simply the fear that a strong Iran or a strong 'any nation' that we can't dictate too is just not safe to have around.

While Al Queda might have attacked us (never gone to Jury so it's really truly just speculation and circumstantial evidence as to who did carry out 9-11) but Afghanistan sure didn't, and Iraq sure didn't.

What they did do is fail to let us the United States and our 'Elected' leader dictate to them how they must respond to us and what posture they must take and where on the totem pole and the pecking order they belong in our opinion or we will kill you all and let G-d sort it out Foreign Policy.

The reality is Iran hasn't attacked anyone in all of my 45 years of life, and I don't really think they plan on attacking anyone.

The way Israel and America counducts foreign policy I really honestly believe even us citizens could use a nuclear deterent to protect ourselves from our governments at this point.

There is no credible evidence or history that Iran plans to or wants to genuinely attack anyone. There is a real history of the U.S. and Israel not wanting any Middle East or Oil Producing nation in Asia (Iran is in Asia) not having a mutually assured destruction capability so we can always be self assured of moving in on their country and imposing our will through military might.

To bad people can't see this is not about Theran but about us not standing that we can't bully or push around, intimidate, frivolously take over and pillage and plunder any individual nation at will.

I honestly am a lot more afraid of my own American government and what it is willing, wanting and prepared to do to me and the people of America than I am of Theran's government.

Peace should always be given a chance and time tables should never be placed on other nations who aren't attacking anyone and haven't attacked anyone, when and how they must respond to us, that's not peace, that's Dominance and submission.
Pages:     ^^TOP^^