It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by 2PacSade
NADS is generic, and on both sides of any argument. The topic is irrelevant.
It has to do with the human emotional response, not 911.
Some people make up their minds and that's it. Nothing else gets in. We will only allow what fits, and disregard all that doesn't. I have done it myself in the past. . .
The best "therapy" possible I think is to be proven wrong. Then and only then can we take a step back & realize we're only human, and quite fallible at best.
pancake, free fall, NIST,nano,thermite,thermate, Jones, never before, coincidence and cabal
It was alleged that it was past that point because it was not known at that time that it was bought down.
Thank you for illustrating. Now, any information from a unbiased source?
Main Entry: un·bi·ased
1 : free from bias; especially : free from all prejudice and favoritism : eminently fair
2 : having an expected value equal to a population parameter being estimated
synonyms see fair
— un·bi·ased·ness \-əs(t)-nəs\ noun
Pilots4truth is not a unbiased site. And you are after all by post their opinions making a claim based off them. It stands to you to prove. Not me.
You do a fair job of descrediting yourself. Not that I am all in a tizzy to discredit you as you obviously think. That would imply more emotional resources then I am applying to this argument realistically. Your source is biased and that is that. You as the claimant by proxy *you ARE offering up their information as fact after all* are by that act making a claim. A claim you must support, not complain about those that are asking you to back it up.
When did I say anything about facts being emotional? I did mention something about emotional resources when you alleged I am in a hurry to discredit you but that had nothing to do with what you apparently got.
Originally posted by Watcher-In-The-Shadows
reply to post by impressme
And we come full circle to the original question. I guess I shall attempt to reword it. Where is your proof that it is true?
Originally posted by esdad71
There is also a report by your ATC guys that 93 hit Camp David at 10:40. Seems they really do not know what is going on do they?
You are looking at phone transcripts not official ATC communications. Did you even read the full report ?Right there is shows that they are posting things that are not correctly represented.
Here it is.... Link'
this is why I get so upset with the garbage that is posted and people read it as truth.