It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by CameronFox
Originally posted by jprophet420
m
So if I say "4+4=8, and btw I can astrally project myself", it means 4+4 does not equal 8?
Not an accurate analogy. 4 + 4 = 8 is a mathematical fact. His "opinion" was that the hole was too small for a 757. Does he offer mathematical calculations for this?
Originally posted by jprophet420
I think that he has the credentials to decipher the data. Either you will present something contrary to that or not.
Again JP, who do you think knows more about what actions / procedures were taken on 9-11 from the Boston tower?
1- Someone who was there in the 1970's
2- Someone that was there on 9/11/2001
Thank you.
37. After analyzing all the radar data available to me from the FAA via the 84th
RADES Radar Squadron, a military facility tasked with monitoring and recording all
radar data fed into it from its various military radar sites, FAA radar sites, and joint use
radar sites, I have concluded that three of the four airliners, AA11, UA175 and UA93
were kept in full and positive radar contact from just after lift off at their departure airports up until their respective crash points as follows:
AA11-Boston to WTC1
UA175-Boston to WTC2
UA93-Newark to Shanksville, PA
38. AA77 was lost to positive radar contact in eastern Ohio, and was NEVER re-
radar identified. The high-speed eastbound primary radar target eventually seen by
Danielle O’Brien at Dulles Tower-Potomac Approach and on a heading towards
Washington, D.C., which then made a large turn into, or over, the Pentagon, has been
PRESUMED to be AA77, but that presumption is based upon unreliable evidence found,
or placed, at the Pentagon crash site, or misread in a reverse-engineered identification
process.
Originally posted by jprophet420
So, you are telling me that the size of flight 77 is variable? We can measure the plane, we can measure the hole, we can measure the marks from the wings. What part of that falls under "opinion"?
Engineers Report On Pentagon Building Performance Presents Significant Findings On Structural Resistance To Progressive Collapse
Originally posted by jprophet420
....... that presumption is based upon unreliable evidence found,
or placed, at the Pentagon crash site, or misread in a reverse-engineered identification process.
Originally posted by jprophet420
I'm sorry but you have proven beyond a shadow of a doubt that you have no debating skills.
Not one thing you have posted refutes the OP. The things you just linked to show NO evidence of flight 77 hitting the pentagon.
That is the article you linked to. It does not even mention flight 77.
Originally posted by ZindoDoone
reply to post by jprophet420
How prophetic. No, questions do not debunk but Answers do and NONE are forth coming and you've just managed to do the very thing I posted about. A NON answer, answer! I guess your another one that thinks the question has no bearing on the facts.
Zindo
It was to offer you guidance as to the damage that was done in the Pentagon was consistent with a 757. It also offers you contact information that I know you will ignore.
A Pentagon security camera located near the northwest corner of the
building recorded the aircraft as it approached the building. Five photo-
graphs (figures 3.3 through 3.7), taken approximately one second apart,
show the approaching aircraft and the ensuing fireball associated with
the initial impact.The first photograph (figure 3.3) captured an image of
the aircraft when it was approximately 320 ft (approximately 0.42 sec-
ond) from impact with the west wall of the Pentagon.Two photographs
(figures 3.3 and 3.7), when compared, seem to show that the top of the
fuselage of the aircraft was no more than approximately 20 ft above the
ground when the first photograph of this series was taken.
The Boeing 757 approached the west wall of the Pentagon from
the southwest at approximately 780 ft/s.As it approached the Pen-
tagon site it was so low to the ground that it reportedly clipped an
antenna on a vehicle on an adjacent road and severed light posts.
When it was approximately 320 ft from the west wall of the build-
ing (0.42 second before impact), it was flying nearly level, only a
few feet above the ground (figures 3.2 and 3.13, the latter an aeri-
al photograph modified graphically to show the approaching air-
craft).The aircraft flew over the grassy area next to the Pentagon
until its right wing struck a piece of construction equipment that
was approximately 100 to 110 ft from the face of the building (0.10
second before impact (figure 3.14). At that time the aircraft had
rolled slightly to the left, its right wing elevated.
posted by ZindoDoone
reply to post by OrangeJuice
There are interviews with family members who are asking where their relatives and friends are from that flight if no flight or a 'Decoy' flew into the towers and the Pentagon. I have been asking this same question since this issue was raised. If no plane hit the Pentagon and a missile did where are the passengers that as many as 300 relatives, friends and business partners know flew on that flight? I have asked Craig Renke and several others only to be ignored or given answers that denigrate me for asking! None of these 'Researchers' have an answer but they keep spewing their one sided accusations and rhetoric! This question is the one variable that begs an answer!
Except for the husband of Cee Cee Lyons, who probably already suspects that their calls were either faked or staged, most of the other families probably do not exist. Why else would they shut down LAX when the families of the alleged victims of the three flights which were supposed to land there, would have been showing up? How come the reporter only saw two family members of the alleged people on the three flights three hours later? Don't the airlines usually console the families of victims of air disasters? There should have been hundreds; even thousands of California family members and friends and fellow employees showing up for the victims of all four flights, and both airports were shut down and evacuated?
Flight 11 - Logan Intl Airport in Boston to Los Angeles Intl Airport
Flight 175 - Logan Intl Airport in Boston to Los Angeles Intl Airport
Flight 77 - Washington Dulles Intl Airport to Los Angeles Intl Airport
Flight 93 - Newark Intl Airport to San Francisco Intl Airport
LAX Evacuated (7:25 in video)
Why? So the American people and the reporters and the world would not quickly realize that most of the alleged passengers on board those alleged hijacked aircraft were either fictional or not dead after all?
So they evacuated and closed down LAX (and SFO) on 9-11 because???
source
Originally posted by Swampfox46_1999
reply to post by jprophet420
And in all four instances on 9/11, the aircraft left evidence, which he either cannot or refuses to see. So, once again, I question his motives, if not his sanity at times.