It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by trebor451
Bumped one more time to point out nobody - repeat, NOBODY - from the CIT/PfT Team, even the original poster, Turbofan, could defend this hilarious piece of "legal" comedy.
I suppose if I were in their shoes, I wouldn't want to defend it either. You lie down with dogs, or in this case insanely idiotic lawsuits, what do you get up with?
The Stupid Bar...at an all time low now. No worries here, though. I have faith it will go lower yet.
Quite the combination - an "organization" (such as it is) without a shred of integrity or honesty leeching onto a lawsuit that hasn't a snowball's chance on the surface of the sun to survive in order to get attention. Now THERE'S a recipe for success if I ever saw
Since none of the PfT Cabal had the cojones to answer me here
Re: The title of this post..."April Gallop Court Case Begins to Roll"...the loud "splat" you heard was the court case as it rolled over. The second "splat" you heard was PfT landing on top of it.
Originally posted by Swampfox46_1999
reply to post by tezzajw
And you still just do not get it do you? ........ I did not think it was that hard a concept to understand.
posted by trebor451
Cap't Bob promptly banned me and deleted my post. AND never gave me an answer
Originally posted by SPreston
Trebor trebor trebor; .....
You were banned because you once again violated the forum rules for the umpteenth time.
You would not recognize truth if it slapped you in the face.
[edit on 7/23/09 by SPreston]
Originally posted by turbofan
As usual, more lies from Trebor. Here is his post:
The post wasn't deleted, it was moved to an appropriate forum. Your opinions
are noted, but not worth responding to. You were banned because of
the poor approach to reason and provide facts. If you "think" this case
is funny, you are entitled to that view. I will only speak for the FDR
research as that is something I'm familiar with. If you want answers
about anything else, try another member perhaps as I have not followed
much about the witness.
...poor approach to reason and provide facts