I think despite the overwhelming urge to consider these paintings as part of the NWO's plan for mass destruction, we should still keep a level-head
about things.
The artworks on their own, without allegations of secret underground cities etc, are quite disturbing, and if it were
only the paintings, I
would have put it down to the disturbing, yet alternative view point of the artist. After all, many artists are known for eccentricity...
I look at it from that perspective and can see it is plausible. Humour me for a moment..
For example:
This
webpage says this about the artwork:
... depicts all of the children of the world taking the weapons from each country on earth and giving them to a central figure which is a
GERMAN boy who has this iron fist and anvil in his hand that is totally out of proportion to the child's body, beating the swords into
plowshares.
It's important to remember that this is just
one person's interpretation of the painting. From another perspective, the boy could be of any
nationality - it's not like he has a sign over him saying he's specifically german. The anvil he is "beating into plowshares", appears to me like
him and co. are trying to destroy the weapons.. And the "iron fist"?? Just silver gloves (although, why the author felt the need to put the boy in
gloves, I don't understand). I think
so many people will see what they want to see. This isn't being ignorant, but it isn't jumping on the
band-wagon either. It is simply being critical from all stand points. Take it all with a grain of salt.
But, in saying this, there is other mounting 'evidence' against the "innocence" of the entire subject of DIA. The whole shebang seems incredibly
ridiculous, what with even the runways apparently forming a "swastika" shape.
It would be so easy in this particular case to be swept up in the controversy. I urge people to find as much information as they can from many sources
but still remain critical, don't be easily led. Form your own opinions from a critical view point.. But I'm sure most ATSers already know know all
of this anyway
reply to post by MightyAl
Apparently on
this
page it mentions that the "General Skeleton" painting was actually 2nd, after the "In Peace and Harmony with Nature", but now is after
"The Children of the World Dream of Peace", I think..
I really couldn't say which way I think it's going, whether the "General Skeleton" picture is meant to be coming after or before the "Children
dream of Peace" one..
I'm still trying to make sense of all of this.
For everyones viewing pleasure, here are some galleries:
Gallery 1
Gallery 2
Gallery 3
An interesting discussion about the artwork and murals:
Convo
[edit on 7/8/09 by pretty_vacant]