"Evidence" from the birth certificate conspiracy, my analysis, page 7
Pages: <<  4    5    6    7    8    9    10  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 40 times


reply posted on 15-7-2009 @ 11:40 PM by Totakeke
reply to post by Southern Guardian



So the only people whom have confirmed that he truly can lead the country are government officials? Interesting. I ask you again, how do you know 100% he was born on US soil?


reply posted on 15-7-2009 @ 11:54 PM by Southern Guardian
Originally posted by Totakeke
So the only people whom have confirmed that he truly can lead the country are government officials?


Vai the constiution he has sufficiently proven his citizenship and there for is eligible for the presidency as congress and the electoral college confirmed on December 2008. The people spoke on November 4th 2008 and he was voted in. Whether it was by 7 million or 700,000 via the constitution and as a democracy the people accepted what he presented and voted him in.

The rightwing fringe may have plenty of questions regarding him, may have kept "shut" during the Bush administration and may have other questions on every occasion some liberal is elected, but they do not dictate this path of this nation alone, they share it with the rest of the population. They had their chance to speak, just as everybody else on November 4th 2008, as the liberals did the same back in 2004 and 2000. The outcome was clear, the confirmation was clear, it is "clear" Obama is and has been president for 8 months now and counting.

how do you know 100% he was born on US soil?


I can ask the same question for every other president among the 44, how do we know they were 100% born on US soil? We cant, because we cant all account for being present at their birth. This is specifically why we have the constitution and the laws set in it, to assure there is a traditional process for confirming somebodies birth right, and Obama passed that, as did the rest of the 44.

Now heres my question since you so adamantly back up this conspiracy, why cant you seem to provide proof he was born off american soil? Or do you have nothing to show for it really but your "personal suspcions"?

SG


[edit on 15-7-2009 by Southern Guardian]



reply posted on 16-7-2009 @ 12:04 AM by Avarus
reply to post by Totakeke



What ever happen to innocent until proven guilty? You are making wild accusations without providing proof that a long-term birth certificate is required by the constitution. Why can't you accept that he is our president? He was voted in honestly and confirmed.

Thank you Southern Guardian for not backing down. A lot of OP's contribute on the first page and then disappear. Sadly, you are a minority on this forum... with your facts... and your logic... and your hula-hoops... and your research... pacman videogames... and Dan Fogelberg records.

Keep it up! You have a fan here!


[edit on 7.16.2009 by Avarus]


reply posted on 16-7-2009 @ 12:18 AM by googolplex
Originally posted by Avarus
reply to
post by Totakeke



What ever happen to innocent until proven guilty? You are making wild accusations without providing proof that a long-term birth certificate is required by the constitution. Why can't you accept that he is our president? He was voted in honestly and confirmed.

Thank you Southern Guardian for not backing down. A lot of OP's contribute on the first page and then disappear. Sadly, you are a minority on this forum... with your facts... and your logic... and your hula-hoops... pacman videogames... and Dan Fogelberg records.

Keep it up! You have a fan here!

What about everything he said in his Campaign has been lies, is it also possible he lied about his place of birth?

And why did Bill Clinton say what he did about Obama, something like can't blame a guy for trying.
Did Bill know something he's not talking about?

Take a look around we have been scamed, lied to, sold out, the Money Men are finshing off the United States.
George Washington and Thomas Jefferson hated Government and only saw as a Evil necessity.
We should of heeded there warnings, what ever that means.



[edit on 16-7-2009 by googolplex]


reply posted on 16-7-2009 @ 12:29 AM by googolplex
reply to post by Southern Guardian


I could not even get a social security number with a piece of paper, the likes of which he presented, and they let him become the President.


reply posted on 16-7-2009 @ 01:16 AM by ELECTRICkoolaidZOMBIEtest
reply to post by googolplex



obviously he was able to get a social security number with it.
maybe you should sue for discrimination against you.



reply posted on 16-7-2009 @ 06:22 AM by FlyersFan
Originally posted by Southern Guardian
Why hasnt anybody provided that evidence of him being born off soil?

Why hasn't anybody provided that evidence of him being born ON soil?

Originally posted by Wildbob77
I think that it is a clear cut case of racism.

Oh brother.

Originally posted by Wildbob77
What other president has been asked to produce evidence of a natural birth.

There hasn't been any question with them.

Why isn't the birth announcement in the Hawaii newspaper enough.

ALREADY ANSWERED. Read the thread. The announcement is just that ... a birth announcement. AND the facts in that announcement were wrong. The Obamas didn't live at that Hawaiian address they alleged themselves to live at.

Originally posted by Avarus
This birth certificate nonsense has gone on too long.

I agree. Obama should have shown the real one long ago.

grow up people.

back atchya. American citizens wanting to be sure that the POTUS is eligible does NOT make them childish.

Originally posted by Wildbob77
have personally verified that the health department holds Obama's original Birth certificate.

jeeeeeeeeeeeze .. read the thread! That has already been addressed.
They only verified that there is a birth certificate in the vault.
They did NOT verifiy anything it said or that it is proof that
Obama was born in the USA.

There were 4 types of Hawaiian birth certificates at that time. The 4th
type only required that the parents say they were Hawaiian residents
in order to get the B.C. They didn't have to provide proof of birth on
the island.

Originally posted by eniac
What's your source on that?

It's already been posted! Read the thread.

of course I haven't read the whole thread. I'm not going to wade through x pages of lunatic-fringe garbage on a complete non-issue.

Are you two years old or something? Jeeeeze.... we are NOT going to spoon feed you because you are too damn lazy to read the information provided. READ THE THREAD or get off it. That is how it works.

OY


reply posted on 16-7-2009 @ 11:52 AM by pavil
Originally posted by Southern Guardian
reply to
post by pavil



Can you account for what hospital the rest of the 44 presidents were born in?
Can you account for long form birth certificates from the rest of the 44 presidents?

I think the fringe harass enough folk for the hospital not to be released, thanks.



Ford was born as Leslie Lynch King, Jr. on July 14, 1913, at 3202 Woolworth Avenue in Omaha, Nebraska, where his parents lived with his paternal grandparents.

Jimmy Carter Born was born in Wise Hospital (which is now the Lillian G. Carter Nursing Center) at Plains, Sumter County, Ga., October 1, 1924. First President to be born in a hospital.


Ronald Reagan: 119 South Main Street, Tampico, IL 61283 on February 6, 1911

Bush, George Herbert Walker
born on 12 June 1924 at 11:45 (= 11:45 AM )
Place Grace-New Haven Community Hospital
in Connecticut. Milton MA, USA, 42n15, 71w05


Blythe (Clinton), William Jefferson IV
born on 19 August 1946 at 08:51 (= 08:51 AM )
Place Julia Chester Hospital Hope AR, USA, 33n40, 93w36

George W. Bush Born in Yale New Haven Hospital - New Haven, CT on July 6, 1946.




You were saying??????????



[edit on 16-7-2009 by pavil]


reply posted on 16-7-2009 @ 12:47 PM by Loke.
reply to post by FlyersFan



If you gonna quote things then please use whole structured sentences instead of taking it out of context. The thing was, and still is that people who are opposing the obama birth thing in this thread should back up all their fantastic claims with some evidence instead of their shooting in the dark theory, and for sure they should not expect other people who made this thread and already have provided evidence for their claims to also do the work for the opposing people.

Best regards

Loke.:.


reply posted on 16-7-2009 @ 01:14 PM by pavil
Originally posted by Loke.
reply to
post by FlyersFan


..... The thing was, and still is that people who are opposing the obama birth thing in this thread should back up all their fantastic claims with some evidence instead of their shooting in the dark theory, and for sure they should not expect other people who made this thread and already have provided evidence for their claims to also do the work for the opposing people.

Best regards

Loke.:.


Huh? What have we been provided in the way of absolute proof on the Obama Birth Certificate? A short form BC which doesn't come from the hospital and a News Clipping, without details. We have not seen the Long Form with the Hospital, Parents, Date of Birth, Time Ect? To claim that we have seen all there is to be seen is disingenuous.

Either it exists and can be presented or allowed to be presented by the President or it does not. The "fantastic claim" is that the Long form birth certificate has not been made public. That is easily rectified by President Obama. It's reasonable to ask about the long form, given the controversy surrounding his birth, and it's the only way to stop the controversy.


reply posted on 16-7-2009 @ 02:19 PM by Byteman
While it is true Obama had attained Kenyan citizenship in conjunction to his US citizenship at birth, his citizenship expired by the time he was 21 years of age.

His dual-citizenship at birth, disqualifies him as a Natural born citizen.
It does not matter if it was dropped when he turned 21. The constitution is very clear on the issue...dual citizen at birth = not Natural born.
The damage is done, so to speak.

I'll speak on the public school, and Indonesian citizenship at the same time.

SG, you claim that Obama could not have gained a Indonesian Citizenship due to the strict laws at the time. You also claim that he could have gotten into public schools without it, by lying to the schools.

So what prevented anyone from lying to the government about his time in country? Someone could have lied to get him a citizenship, and then he attended public school with said citizenship. Could have gotten forged documents showing extended time in country as well.

These points of yours are sort of moot, since they can used against your argument equally well. Plus you don't really have any proof that someone lied for Obama, but we do have proof that he attended schools there. The really funny thing is, you label your speculation about someone lying for Obama as Truth.

The birth certificate presented by the Obama campaign was verified multiple times by the Hawaii state health department

I'll just post that much, it's all that's needed really. There has been no Birth Certificate presented, only a "Certificate of Live Birth"...and yes...there is a legal distinction between the two, whether you want to acknowledge that or not. The "officials" can yell til they are blue in the face that it matches real information, and it does not matter. It is not a vault copy of a birth certificate, and thus, only proof that their printer is indeed working.

From the link you posted:
The birth certificate wasn't available before because Obama's birth state of Hawaii does not make such records public and the campaign did not release it.


www.politifact.com...

See, even your own link agrees with me. You have NOT seen a birth certificate.

If I handed a cop a piece of paper that said, "License to drive" and swore that it represented real information. Would the cop take that and be satisfied? No. Probably not, and I won't accept a secondary document either.

This is just a non-issue though, smokescreen if you will. Since it does not even matter what his BC reveals. He was a dual-citizen at birth and disqualified as a Natural. This is my solid stance on anything concerning a BC or related materials.

I'd address the rest of your "case", I won't though since it is mostly harping on the birth certificate issue. I am sure that I have made my stance on that abundantly clear.


reply posted on 16-7-2009 @ 03:27 PM by jmotley
reply to post by pavil



I disagree No matter what he does people will find another reason to say he is not eligible. If he releases it now the nay sayers will just say it took to long now we think it's a fake.


reply posted on 16-7-2009 @ 05:37 PM by AlGoreIthem
reply to post by Southern Guardian



Isn't fact check.org owned by the obama campaign? I like how you use "birthers" as if it demeans and discredits anything, or anyone that opposes your cult leader.
Pages: <<  4    5    6    7    8    9    10  >>    ^^TOP^^



This Hoax Effects Everyone!!!
  Posted 1 days ago with 86 member flags
DEA is Investigating Montana State Legislators Over State Laws
  Posted 13 days ago with 59 member flags
The CIA in Australia: America\'s Foreign Watergate
  Posted 3 days ago with 19 member flags
Who is really behind the birthers and what is their real motive?
  Posted 12 days ago with 11 member flags
ESF and Black op funding.
  Posted 11 days ago with 11 member flags
There is NO Media Bias in America
  Posted 12 days ago with 10 member flags