It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
You may have felt intimidated, but I don't think you behaved like a "chicken" at all. In fact, you are the first Christian to come back to me with anything aside from "It's God word, I don't question it," or "You're going to burn in hell."
Originally posted by wylekat
Heck, I am supposed to be one of them, and I get that. It's like a lot of them are nothing more than preprogrammed robots, spouting only certain things- and anything that gets stuck into that programming sideways is met with "DOES NOT COMPUTE!".
Tho, I will admit, the next person who quotes Job at me is gonna find that whole story shoved up their....
Originally posted by nomorecruelty
Jesus is the only way for salvation and to Heaven. I have to shudder at all of the people on here that are falling right along behind the rest of the sheep on this one.
Very interesting indeed. Tell me, Christians on this thread: why do you speak of your God's love, but quote his rage as motivation? Is it fear of your God's retribution that compells you? Or a delight in the thought that he will consider you righteous whilst condemning others to hell.
Just when I was about ready to abandon my quest, I come to this – the Commandment that perhaps has the most going for it of any of them. It’s short (in fact, the shortest of them all at just 4 words totaling 16 letters); it apparently leaves little room for misunderstanding; it touches on an obviously important moral issue with obvious real world consequences – behavior that’s truly a matter of life and death; it’s perhaps the most quoted of all the Commandments; it seems to be the one people have most in mind when they say we ought to be posting the Ten Commandments in all our schools to prevent future Columbines; and it seems to be part of virtually every rational moral system I’ve ever heard of (though often qualified or modified a bit).
Alas, things are never simple when it comes to the Bible.
First off, it’s odd and troubling that such an important law is buried in the middle of the Ten Commandments. Less significant ones bracket it. Less important ones are given far more room and emphasis. This creates the impression that God didn’t take it as seriously as He should have. And if He didn’t, why should we?
Secondly, it’s one more Commandment that’s just given – plop. No explanation accompanies it. No rationale is given for its inclusion here. The consequences of following or not following it are not described. This further undermines its significance, and it also seems to reduce the likelihood of people actually following it.
Thirdly, it turns out that it is neither as obvious nor as understandable as it seems. Some people think it actually means or should read “Thou shalt not murder.”
By saying this, they force us all to go on another long detour down a rabbit hole….
Imagine you’re a teacher in a classroom. Imagine that you’ve given the following assignment: “Come up with a list of ten guiding laws or principles for moral behavior. You have as much time as you need to complete this assignment. You may have anyone and everyone help you. Go!” A couple thousand years later, a student comes in and gives you the Bible. The student tells you it was in effect written by God Himself. You spend a lot of time looking it over very carefully. In the course of doing so, you read “Thou shalt not kill,” and have a few problems with that. You whip out your red pen, leave a few comments, grade the Bible accordingly, and hand it back. Next day, the student comes storming back in and says, “Unfair! It really meant to say ‘Thou shalt not murder’!” What do you do? Do you say, “Oh, silly me – of course!”? Do you say, “Yes, I can see how thousands of years might not be enough time to polish a simple, 4-word sentence – here’s an extension”? Do you say, “Oh, sure – every perfect God is entitled to a few mistakes even when it comes to what’s perhaps the most important thing He’s ever said.” Do you decide to practice your own sort of “an eye for an eye” justice and say “Well, if YOU get to say ‘kill really means murder,’ then I get to say that ‘Thou shalt not steal’ really should read ‘Thou shalt now steal’ – so hand over your lunch money – NOW! – and nobody will get hurt!”? Or do you do what I’d do and reassign this student to a remedial reading class before he or she can waste anymore of your time?
Ok, that’s admittedly just my initial, visceral response to being jerked around this way. Here’s my completely logical, rational response for those who might be interested.
If God or the Bible meant “murder” instead of “kill,” God and the Bible should have said “murder” instead of “kill.”
On what grounds do I grant you the right to amend them? If you have the right to amend the Bible to better fit your beliefs and arguments, why don’t I? Why is it that defenders of the Bible always seem to claim the right to re-interpret the Bible to better fit current sensibilities but they never ever grant others the right to re-interpret it for the worse?
www.anatheist.net...
Originally posted by mrsdudara
You know, my bible says something different. Its says the son of man is comming. Not Christ. Not the son of God. The son of man. typo?
Originally posted by Nohup
It also pretty clearly and unambiguously says that his name will be Emmanuel, not Jesus (or Yeshua). Of course, if you don't think the Bible is being literal there, maybe you can explain why we should accept anything in it as literal.
www.bibliotecapleyades.net... Jesus Ministry
Custodial Religion
Source or inspiration of teachings is said to be a God, angel, or supernatural force; not a human being.
Belief in a single Supreme Being, or God, is a principle cornerstone of faith. (In earlier times, worship of many humanlike "Gods.")
Physical immortality is an important or desired goal in many Custodial religions. Adherence to doctrine, based upon faith or obedience alone, is stressed.
Severe or fatal physical punishments are sometimes employed or advocated during the religion’s history to deal with nonbelievers or backsliders.
Belief that being born in a human body, either once or
many times through reincarnation, is part of a broad spiritual plan which will ultimately benefit every human being.
Belief that there are "higher forces," "Gods," or supernatural entities which control people’s individual or collective fates. Human beings have no control over those forces and can only yield to them.
Belief that only one Supreme Being alone created the physical universe.
Human suffering, toil, and enslavement are part of a broader spiritual plan which will ultimately lead to salvation and freedom for those who obediently endure it.
Spiritual recovery and salvation depend entirely upon the grace of "God" or other supernatural entity.
www.bibliotecapleyades.net... Jesus Ministry
Maverick Religion
Source or inspiration of teachings is said to be an identifiable human being. Belief in a Supreme Being is usually tolerated, but is a minor or nonexistent part of doctrine.
Emphasis is placed on the role of the individual spiritual being in relation to the universe.
Spiritual freedom and immortality are sought. Endless existence in the same physical body is deemed unimportant or undesirable.
Observation and reason are held to be the proper foundations for adhering to a doctrine. Physical punishments or duress are very mild to nonexistent.
Severest punishment is usually formal exclusion of an
individual from the religious organization.
Belief that there is no hidden spiritual purpose to human existence and that the process of death-amnesia-rebirth causes spiritual decay.
Belief that all people are ultimately responsible for having created their own conditions in life, good and bad, by the known actions and inactions, and that all people can ultimately control their own destinies.
Belief that everyone has something to do with the creation and/or perpetuation of the physical universe.
Human suffering, toil, and enslavement are social ills that have no constructive purpose and stand in the way of spiritual salvation and freedom.
Spiritual recovery and salvation are entirely up to the individual to achieve through his or her own self motivated effort.
THE STORY MOST people know of Jesus is told in the New Testament. The New Testament, like much of the Old Testament, is in many places a greatly altered version of the original accounts on which it is based. In addition, probably less than 5% of all that Jesus and his original followers taught is found in the Bible.
Many of the changes and deletions to the New Testament were made by special church councils. The editing process began as early as 325 A.D. during the First Council of Nicea, and continued well into the 12th century. For example, the Second Synod [church council] of Constantinople in 553 A.D. deleted from the Bible Jesus’s references to “reincarnation”—an important concept to Jesus and his early followers. Later, the Lateran Councils of the 12th century added a tenet to the Bible that was never taught by Jesus: the concept of the “Holy Trinity.”
The Christian church did not limit itself to changing a few ideas, it also rejected entire books. The church destroyed many documents and records which contradicted the radical changes that were made to Christian doctrine by these councils.
Some of the material was rightfully rejected. Other Apocryphal works, however, were omitted simply because they contradicted the official church version of Jesus’s life on several crucial details. These are details which, if carefully researched, would offer a somewhat different outlook on the life of Jesus from the one presented in the authorized Bible.
Originally posted by wylekat
It interests me how God says "thou shalt not kill"-yet, he commanded his priests to kill, his people to kill, HE kills, animals were killed around the clock when the temples were up, made sure his son was killed.......
Originally posted by wylekat
Christians throughout history have killed, the church killed, the crusades killed, And today, modern Christianity kills, just not in the same fast bloody fashion, they do it slowly and cheerfully.
this is a good place to say this i guess.you can get a pretty good clue on the way things work for atheists.you never see them bashing the
Very ture.some people who even are enlightened to the global elite don't realize that SATAN is the one who is the true leader of it all.He and his fallen angels
Originally posted by Praetorian Guard
Originally posted by wylekat
It interests me how God says "thou shalt not kill"-yet, he commanded his priests to kill, his people to kill, HE kills, animals were killed around the clock when the temples were up, made sure his son was killed.......
More accurately, he said not to murder, which is the unjust taking of human life.
We can see from context that He never intended there to be zero human caused deaths, whether human or animal.
He authorized the killing and eating of animal flesh in Noah's covenant.
In this same covenant, He also commanded the death penalty for those who kill humans.
Though the Hebrews had been sacrificing animals for various reasons since Abraham, He instituted the sacrificial system of the Aaronic priesthood. This continued until AD 70, when the Temple was destroyed.
Under the Mosaic covenant, the death penalty was expanded to apply to other behaviors. Murder, adultery, homosexual sex acts, Sabbath breaking, rape, kidnapping, bestiality, incest, witchcraft, and a number of other acts could get you killed in Israel's early days.
YHWH called for the annihilation of the Canaanites. God is Lord over all the Earth, not just the Hebrews. The Canaanites were practicing behaviors God considered wicked. God enlisted the Hebrews as His hammer of justice. They were to wipe out all the Canaanites, and so would inherit the land of Canaan as their own. The Hebrews failed to do this completely, however.
War was a fact of life for many nations back in early Israel's day. And so, they fought. Rather than expecting His people to be sitting duck pacifists, He allowed their warfare, even calling for it, and gave them rules of engagement. He even gave them marching orders and strategy. He even participated in their battles and sent angelic beings into the fray, as well. (Here's a hint at another topic...the Ark of the Covenant was not a weapon. It was a throne. Guess who sat upon it?)
And God, being the Creator of life and Lord of all that is, may terminate anyone's life should He so desire it. He owns us all. And since He has this right, He's not guilty of wrongdoing. He may administrate His creation as He sees fit. We see it everywhere, everyday, whether we like how He runs things or not. This divine prerogative does not extend to anyone on Earth, aside from the permissions and commandments He's given to particular individuals (Joshua, David, etc.) or to nations as they play out their roles and responsibilities (death penalty, justified police violence, warfare).
So...God gave a commandment against murder. But instituted and commanded other forms of killing. He is the Creator and gets to set the boundaries. Also, all sins that are committed are primarily committed against this Creator, so He is the one who gets to say what offends Him and what is acceptable to Him.
Originally posted by wylekat
Christians throughout history have killed, the church killed, the crusades killed, And today, modern Christianity kills, just not in the same fast bloody fashion, they do it slowly and cheerfully.
A nation that is self-consciously Christian may make war when it is necessary to the defense of its people and borders. This is a just war.
That nation may also put convicted criminals to death, should their crimes be of the kind that deserves death.
And I agree...there have been times when the Church took up the sword, which belongs solely to Caesar. The Church has spiritual sanctions. And when it has usurped the power of death from Caesar, the Church has been wrong and guilty of great sin. This does not invalidate the Law or Christ or even the Church. It simply shames the Church and shows that it's comprised of people who have broken God's laws, even after their conversion to Christ.
Well said the catholics were responsible for the inqusitions not god or true christians.Catholisism is pagan
Originally posted by randyvs
reply to post by Harbinger777
this is a good place to say this i guess.you can get a pretty good clue on the way things work for atheists.you never see them bashing the
Very ture.some people who even are enlightened to the global elite don't realize that SATAN is the one who is the true leader of it all.He and his fallen angels
satanists for believing in satan. but i do notice they team up together
to bash anyone who believes in Jesus Christ.
even satanists know there's a god
(Exactly It takes more faith to beleive you were created by nothing than to beleive in a creator.
Originally posted by ofhumandescent
Later, the Lateran Councils of the 12th century added a tenet to the Bible that was never taught by Jesus: the concept of the “Holy Trinity.”