It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


ufos studying a chemtrail

page: 3
<< 1  2    4 >>

log in


posted on Jul, 15 2009 @ 11:51 PM
reply to post by Overload

Air-To-Air Refueling Pod

Aerial Refueling
Aerial refueling, also called air refueling, in-flight refueling (IFR), air-to-air refueling (AAR) or tanking, is the process of transferring fuel from one aircraft (the tanker) to another (the receiver) during flight. Applied to helicopters, it is known as HAR for Helicopter Aerial Refueling.The procedure allows the receiving aircraft to remain airborne longer and, more important, to extend its range and therefore those of its weapons or its deployment radius. A series of air refuelings can give range limited only by crew fatigue and engineering factors such as engine oil consumption.

A US Navy TACAMO Aircraft dumping fuel

TACAMO is a U.S. military term meaning "Take Charge and Move Out". TACAMO refers to a system of survivable communications links designed to be used in nuclear war to maintain communications between the decision makers (the National Command Authority) and the triad of strategic nuclear weapon delivery systems. Its primary mission is to receive, verify and retransmit Emergency Action Messages (EAMs) to US strategic forces. It does this by maintaining the ability to communicate on virtually every radio frequency band from Very low frequency (VLF) up through Super high frequency (SHF) using a variety of modulations, encryptions and networks. This airborne communications capability largely replaced the land based Extremely Low Frequencies (ELF) broadcast sites that became vulnerable to nuclear strike.

There is no point in bothering with your quotes, links, and videos, as you cannot even choose legitimate photos.

Deny Ignorant People...

Are you saying we should put you on ignore?

posted on Jul, 16 2009 @ 12:05 AM
reply to post by defcon5

Kudos Defcon5 for debunking all of these outrageous claims. Stars for both of your posts, thanks goodness there are people like you on ATS who deny ignorance and shine the light of truth for anyone willing to see the truth.

Originally posted by Overload
reply to post by Arbitrageur

So what you're saying is ....

You don't mind breathing aluminum oxide.....right?

I didn't say anything about aluminum oxide? I don't even know how to respond to that because it doesn't make any sense, except to say, please study Defcon5's post, you could learn a lot from him.

posted on Jul, 16 2009 @ 12:27 AM
reply to post by greeneyedleo

Sorry, did not see your post until after I made my posts above.

I was just reading answering stuff in sequence.
I will refrain from further Chemtrail/Contrail discussion from here on out, even though it is expressly mentioned in the topic heading.

reply to post by Arbitrageur


Its always good to see another poster here who truly “Denies Ignorance”. Unfortunately, it is becoming a rare trait around here in recent times.

posted on Jul, 16 2009 @ 12:38 AM

Originally posted by defcon5 no such thing as a Chemtrail

Don't let the schoolkids and housewives find out before you do...

Coucil Foreign Relations Essay on Atmospheric Chemical Spraying as ' Geoengineering'

I hate it when backwoods rednecks find out about aviation programs before I do... hell - UFO watchers new about the F-117 before I DID !

'Chemtrails' leaking into MSN

Good luck.

EDIT: Interestingly, the CFR link does not appear to work out of ATS...

Go to and scroll down... Sorry.

[edit on 16-7-2009 by Skelkie3]

posted on Jul, 16 2009 @ 12:47 AM
reply to post by Skelkie3

Sorry a broken link to some supposed document, and a local news broadcast from Podunk Nowhere’sville doesn’t prove anything to me.

Even in the news report, they admit that they cannot prove the SOURCE of the barium, the barium could have been in the water, rather then come from the sky. For all we know he could have intentionally put barium in the water samples, as we have seen in the photos above it would not be the first time a chemtrailer has lied about their supposed proof.

Please go back to my first posts, and show me where they issued a NOTAM for aerial spraying. See, you cannot get around that, that is a law that even the military must follow.

posted on Jul, 16 2009 @ 12:56 AM

Originally posted by Solomons
You dont see anything getting sprayed or fancy lines in the sky.Im not even a meterologist and even i know that if governments were going to spray the populace with all manners of heavy metals,bacteria,chemicals etc it would be at very low altitude compared to what chemtrailers commonly point at to prove they exist.I wish chemtrailers with all their enthusiasm would put that too good use and study the real phenomena of the populace being sprayed...not spending their lives trying to prove that simple contrails are chemicals being sprayed.

The spraying is not about poisoning people or repelling aliens or fairies...

it's about reflecting light ( heat ) back into outer space so that we can continue our way of life. Of course this is done at the highest possible altitudes , given weights of ( apparently metallic ) particles. In other words, the longer they ( the reflective particles) stay up there, the better the effect and cheaper the program.

scroll down to the Council Foreign Relations part... sorry, page won't load from ATS for some reason.

The CFR paper discusses both National and private sector capabilities with regards to what people are referring to as chemtrails. They're just already doing it, that's all... no longer a proposal.

I guess Atmospheric prognosis is ( believed to be ) much more dangerous than we're publicly told.

I suppose ' geoengeneering could be cover for something, but- I could only guess.

[edit on 16-7-2009 by Skelkie3]

posted on Jul, 16 2009 @ 01:01 AM
reply to post by defcon5

Sorry about that link, it loads from here fine ( for some reason ) :

Half way down the page... CFR document

If you are interested, though I suspect you are not. Very interesting to be so passionate about such a thing as this , pro... or con.

posted on Jul, 16 2009 @ 01:05 AM
reply to post by Skelkie3
Why not just use The SUN, Renise, CarniCON, World Net Daily, or Pravda as a source. I mean when I want legitimate facts I ALWAYS go to some questionable blog put up by gawd knows who.

Either way though I read your document, and there is not a single mention of the word Chemtrails in it. Now they do discuss the idea of doing Geoengineering, which is a legitimate thing, but its is currently not going on ATM. They discuss and write papers on lots of things which are not currently happening. As we speak, NASA sitting on plans for missions to Mars, the Moon, and even unconventional spacecraft propulsion, but none of that is currently a physical reality. You might find this difficult to believe, but in any big corporation or governing organization there are actually people who get paid to dream stuff up and write about it, even though they are little more then works of science fiction.

Now that is enough about Chemtrails…
A mod has already spoken that the subject is for another thread.

posted on Jul, 16 2009 @ 01:10 AM

Originally posted by Skelkie3
Very interesting to be so passionate about such a thing as this , pro... or con.

If you are trying to imply something by that, you are out of line. Many of my posts on other topics are just as passionately written, especially about things such as religion. Simply do a search on posts under my profile, and you will see that I write on many other topics as well.

posted on Jul, 16 2009 @ 08:42 AM

Originally posted by defcon5

Originally posted by Skelkie3
Very interesting to be so passionate about such a thing as this , pro... or con.

If you are trying to imply something by that, you are out of line.

Nothing personal and no insult intended ! However, something for your consideration - and for the consideration of anyone passionate about internet debate : taken en toto... the exercise is pointless.

The OP cannot prove on the internet that the ( typically ) blurry dots are ufos. We cannot prove otherwise. They are not ufos to me - they are little spots on a computer screen...

I cannot prove atmospheric mod spraying on the internet , and you cannot disprove it.

If we are passionate about these and other things ( and not merely into
hearing ourselves talk - figuratively speaking ) ... then, I'm afraid that we are in the wrong venue.

Are you an NSA contractor with 300 web addresses ? How the hell would I know ? Am I retired AF aviation ? How the hell would you know ?

If we get excited by these VIRTUAL debates, in my opinion... then we are just playing with ourselves.

[edit on 16-7-2009 by Skelkie3]

posted on Jul, 16 2009 @ 11:26 AM
The chemtrial compositions might be close to what a high voltage
incubation might generate.
There must be many pages on the analysis.

I'll check for more trails and UFO videos as some trail generators
are glowing quite brightly and do not have a plane in front as
this example does.

This trail has a harmless looking plane making a trail but the
trail is not coming from the engines.

ED: Nice plane and contrail pictures, which are real, but not enough
sky lights for UFO reports, which are as real.
ED: possible more orbs and trails here:
Fast moving double orb or cylinder on this page:

[edit on 7/16/2009 by TeslaandLyne]

[edit on 7/16/2009 by TeslaandLyne]

[edit on 7/16/2009 by TeslaandLyne]

posted on Jul, 17 2009 @ 01:05 AM
reply to post by Overload

In the never ending Illuminati cover up of the UFO these sky
smokers are around to hide them if not diminish the sight of
a Tesla triangle or two making their own trails.
Youtube UFO hot spot videographers remark how the trail planes
start when these UFO get stuck in the sky.

posted on Jul, 17 2009 @ 01:23 PM
Concerned average citizen talks about chemtrails.
They do not talk con, they talk Chem.

Montreal Skies June 2009

A log of chemtrail/chemcloud activity and strange weather throughout the month of June here in Montreal. Amazingly, I find that people all over the world notice similar patterns and activity levels happening at the same time in diverse countries. You find several people uploading videos of heavy chemtrailing all around the same time, followed by reports that chemtrailing/weather modification has temporarily stopped, usually around holidays. We notice the same things here in Montreal. Easter, Christmas, New Year's, and even St-Jean-Baptiste days are exempt from spraying. At this time, many people in the US are reporting an abrupt chemtrail hiatus just in time for Independance Day celebrations.

Found in related links.

posted on Jul, 21 2009 @ 03:51 PM

Originally posted by phi1618
After watching it twice the motions of the objects seem superimposed.

Looks fake to me.

These light balls have been photographed and videoed many times
and in many places.
Thats were the Foo term came from.
In following the plane the videoer spotted the Foo and kept on those
and not the plane.
Which goes on in a boring straight line.
The Foo act like monkeys in the sky jumping around in the ether.

posted on Jul, 23 2009 @ 11:40 AM
So any one with evidence of ground contamination or air samples
is welcome to join in the discussion.
I never see any trails except for the high fliers.
So they must be making the toxic trails, if they are toxic.
They last a long time if they are so heavy that they drift down.
That would mean they are tightly nit molecules.
Cooked up in some high voltage furnace.
We hear this all the time from Chemtrail observers and photographers

As for the agile UFO/Foo there are only a few videos with Foos
tracking a trail makes, and a trail making UFO for the mater,
so there must be different craft. If the Foo was so agile to avoid
being shot by B-17 gunners, the Foo must be very small and agile
just like in the video.
I talked to a B-17 gunner and said to hit the plane you shot in front.
I quizzed him about seeing any jets and hinted at seeing even more.
He would not say any more as perhaps he did not know the answers.
And was told not to describe the craft after all these years and in retirement.
So who would know anything back then.
But at least I might compare notes.
His flight was noted for the Foo and the crew given special attention.
Perhaps the reason why I eventually met the flier.

posted on Jul, 28 2009 @ 03:29 PM
New thread, UFO by Chemtrail:
A tilted UFO being recovered and needed some smoke cover.

ED: One photographer posted almost 100 photos with ufos
on the net and on ATS.

[edit on 7/28/2009 by TeslaandLyne]

posted on Aug, 14 2009 @ 11:16 AM
Something new:

Its got everything and a glimpse of a trail maker.

This Mexico saucer has disturbed air behind it:

This one scoots up to the clouds on a side motor leaving smoke from
hot disturbed air:

Once in the upper atmosphere the saucer may indeed make a trail.
However the trail would be purely from cooling hot air except for
and metal pitted off from high voltage.
So the Tesla 'perfect' plane might be polluting.

posted on Aug, 27 2009 @ 09:28 PM
Three interesting Chemtrail topics:

Chemtrails Creeping Into MSM...

KSLA TV test Chemtrail fallout and finds Barium

Chembuster chemtrails remedy

Progress is bring made.

I have something on the Foo operation.
Account of proper coil operation:
I saw a demonstration on youtube of a coil floating until burnout
with ordinary current. Tesla pushed current in the air which will
go with negative charge flow. Studies of a football coil, two cone
coils, show positive light aura of pushed away positive charge as
negative charge enters the bottom and a brush aura at the top
as negative charge flows out. This action in the air or ether is the
suspension of the Foo. Angled by joystick this is the Lyne interpretation
of the Tesla UFO or Foo technology for flight. He has many more ether
theories and experiments.
Something similar perhaps:

[edit on 8/27/2009 by TeslaandLyne]

posted on Aug, 30 2009 @ 04:47 PM

Tails in progress from another plane.


ED: Yeah, had to do it. Note to the video:
Got to be a UFO orb in there some where.
Stranded haywire saucers need a proper operating Earth to Ionosphere
Tesla current which will be supplied by the rescue saucers hid by the trails.
Look at trail makers scurry to fix the cover smokescreen.
Witnessed at low level in "Man Made UFOs 1944-1994".
Saucer dropped from among a group and one went down to stabilize the
sparky one.
Tesla scalar or electrostatic current is focused by an aluminum half sphere

[edit on 8/30/2009 by TeslaandLyne]

posted on Aug, 31 2009 @ 07:22 AM
Wow, more airliners. So do you as a chemtrail believer think the airliners are secretly spraying us?

By the way, barium occur naturally.

new topics

top topics

<< 1  2    4 >>

log in