Great effin job, OP. I've always, well since I started paying attention

, believed follow the cash and it's good game. Thanks a bunch for your
time and efforts.
reply to post by esdad71
Well, roughly 2.2 pounds of nano-scale (80ish nanometer) aluminum powder alone is 1100 USD, according to Inframat(R) Advanced Materials (TM).
www.advancedmaterials.us...
So to get a cost estimate for a 10-100 ton range of this aluminum powder *edit: (Thermitic material), which is 1:3 atomic weight ratio Al:Rust. 1
part aluminum to 3 parts rust. Was actually 9:26.666... but I rounded up rust to make it easier and give ya a lil leeway. Objects in mirror are
closer than they appear.
We get 2.5-25 million USD.
I'm sure for long-time relation/partnership buddies get a discount (hehe), but hell... sounds like a lotta cash to be throwin around to me. Oh, this
doesn't include the rust, the process for correct ratio mixing, plus compression with rust into a nice applicable form, such as a spray or paint or
possibly even a roll (like a cheese dip looking thing), which I'm quite sure costs a few extra bucks.
Who has the capabilities of producing this type of demolitions material, again?
Don't really know, but if this $100k budget the terrorists have to knock down a few towers is all they got, then either:
--a) Our financial system/store, obviously black budget/under-table, was used to fund the events. And the military is involved.
--b) Another wealthy backer is still *officially* hiding. And the military is involved.
--c) That isn't thermitic material.
An argument could be made about the 10 million dollars seized by US authorities in a few bank accounts could be going to this, and is a small part of
the total, which is still, possibly, waiting to be used. But it seems to me we have a couple accounts of credible scientists saying:
--a) Yes, it is thermitic material.
--b) Yes, it is thermitic material.
--c) Yes,... I think we get the pic.
I know it doesn't exactly say who made the money off this, but it's showing a hell of a lotta cash (not relative to earnings, plus massive interest,
of course) went up in smoke (no, literally) on that inevitably tear-filled day.
I think it's rather easy to see the relative ease in which under the table transactions can go unnoticed, the incentive of both parties (insurance
collection/war profiteers and suspects of the actual act) to go through with such a plan, a mental picture of how it all went down, etc.
I just hope the truthers are so, so, sooooo wrong.
[edit on 1-8-2009 by shanerz]
[edit on 1-8-2009 by shanerz]