It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
(visit the link for the full news article)
The target: Illegal immigrants and their U.S.-born children who receive public benefits.
The plan: a California ballot initiative that would end public benefits for illegal immigrants, cut off welfare payments for their children and impose new rules for birth certificates.
The drive coincides with decisions in several states -- including Oklahoma, Colorado Virginia, Arizona and Georgia -- to curtail medical care, mortgage loans, homeless shelter relief and other benefits for illegal immigrants amid the national economic downturn.
Officials estimate that California's 2.7 million illegal residents account for $4 billion to $6 billion of the state's roughly $105-billion budget. Most of those costs are associated with schools, prisons and emergency healthcare.
"Are we going to continue asking taxpayers to pay for these services when the state is completely out of money?" asked Hilton, who first rallied against illegal immigration two decades ago.
Backers say, however, that they have carefully crafted the measure to avoid the legal pitfalls that doomed Proposition 187, which would have barred illegal immigrants from receiving any public social services, education and nonemergency medical care. Voters approved it, 59% to 41%, but a federal judge ruled that the measure unconstitutionally usurped federal jurisdiction over immigration.
The new measure does not claim any state authority to regulate immigration, said Mike Hethmon, an attorney with the Washington-based Immigration Reform Law Institute who advised the initiative's authors. Instead, he said, it is based on federal authority delegated to the states to restrict access to benefits and verify applicants' eligibility.
Originally posted by jjkenobi
That's nice they label them as "activists". Seems similar to "terrorists".
I 100% support not giving illegals public benefits. I do not support not giving a child born in the U.S. public benefits.
Their probably needs to be a faster way for illegals to become legal citizens but that is another issue.
Originally posted by jjkenobi
I 100% support not giving illegals public benefits.
Originally posted by Choronzon
Originally posted by jjkenobi
I 100% support not giving illegals public benefits.
Echo from the past: "I 100% support not giving blacks public benefits."......
Are we doomed to repeat ourselves? The arguments being made against illegals today are the same arguments which were made against blacks during the civil war.
Edit: The idea that someone is subhuman because of their citizenship is nonsensical.
[edit on 7/14/2009 by Choronzon]
Originally posted by jjkenobi
Their probably needs to be a faster way for illegals to become legal citizens but that is another issue.
Echo from the past: "I 100% support not giving blacks public benefits."......
Are we doomed to repeat ourselves? The arguments being made against illegals today are the same arguments which were made against blacks during the civil war.
Edit: The idea that someone is subhuman because of their citizenship is nonsensical.
Originally posted by Choronzon
Originally posted by jjkenobi
I 100% support not giving illegals public benefits.
Echo from the past: "I 100% support not giving blacks public benefits."......
Are we doomed to repeat ourselves? The arguments being made against illegals today are the same arguments which were made against blacks during the civil war.
Edit: The idea that someone is subhuman because of their citizenship is nonsensical.
[edit on 7/14/2009 by Choronzon]
Originally posted by Iamonlyhuman
Originally posted by jjkenobi
That's nice they label them as "activists". Seems similar to "terrorists".
I 100% support not giving illegals public benefits. I do not support not giving a child born in the U.S. public benefits.
Their probably needs to be a faster way for illegals to become legal citizens but that is another issue.
Why don't you support not giving a child born to illegals in the U.S. public benefits? I'm just asking, not arguing. I'm not sure I agree, enlighten me.
[edit on 14/7/2009 by Iamonlyhuman]