ECETI Infrared UFO's and Orbs (2009 Video)

Are you saying that the lights in Iraq are produced by Tesla Technology because they are heat, not light and that they are being viewed through a military thermal imager? And because of this light pillars would not show up the same way because a thermal imager would not see them?

Originally posted by dainoyfb
Are you saying that the lights in Iraq are produced by Tesla Technology because they are heat, not light and that they are being viewed through a military thermal imager? And because of this light pillars would not show up the same way because a thermal imager would not see them?

Yes.
I'm still answering your other post.
I'll combine.

We don't know for sure if the Marine images started in the air,
but if they did that would be a UFO theory on why.
Off to the right appears to be twin beam emanating from the
same object, perhaps a cylinder craft.
These would be observational or command craft.
Your in the air straight lines are apparently from northern regions called
the "aurora borealis" and are like the Tesla 'ropes' of force.

South 'borealis' is hazy and leak out the bottom of the Tesla craft.
I can't tell if there are local forces at work or if ionosphere to ground
currents are at work the force the craft around.
Only 5kv is though to power a craft and the million volt bulb is to
transmute elements as Tesla said he could manufacture Radium.

Also the greening might be CGI to make a night vision pillar from
the ground.
We can't know for sure but thanks for checking out the pillars.

ED: Only those apparent beams in the Marine video.
So never had to tie in anything to Tesla before.



[edit on 7/16/2009 by TeslaandLyne]

Aurora borealis are a completely different phenomenon and have nothing to do with light pillars. Light pillars can start from the ground but often start above the ground depending on the atmospheric conditions. There is good reference material here.

Also the lights in Iraq where viewed with a night vision device using image intensifier technology, not thermal imaging technology.

I own both types:
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/files/8e01b0cc4f118c84.jpg[/atsimg]
and there is a very distinct visual difference between how a night vision image looks and thermal images. I can go into detail about this if you like but most people on ATS that study UFO footage can easily tell the difference.
Even if the Iraq footage were from a thermal imager, the atmosphere is almost completely transparent to thermal radiation so the pillars would have to be at tens of thousands of degrees in order to be detected by a thermal imager.

Thermal images of the UFO itself are said to be birds.
So I do not think much heat is needed.
The infrared image can't be denied both ways.
Also there is more electrical effect than heat as air ionization occurs
as in X-Ray technology.
X-Rays make anything conductive, even the air and these beam although
unknown may be powerful enough to cause a air UV or other response to
the goggles in other ways than infrared.
In other words the beam irradiates enough waves or particle to perhaps
over expose the viewing device.

Take the ordinary daytime or night time UFO bright lights.
These lights are powerful electrostatic responses.
I have not located any Tesla material on beams to the ionosphere
but they do exist from other authors. Dis information perhaps and
a miscalculation on what Tesla was up to perhaps.
A beam from above to the ground through the craft seems possible.

T&L
In retrospect I see that my post was a little vague and I apologize.
Birds do show up well. Here are some that I found in trees:
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/files/d4c2d626b793ccb0.jpg[/atsimg]
However, heated air does not because it is mostly transparent to the thermal infrared band. Here is an image of a building on fire:
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/files/86b657b3f9027d1e.jpg[/atsimg]
As you can see the heated air directly above the flames cannot be detected by the thermal imager despite the fact that I have the minimum detectable temperature set at just +1 degree C as is indicated on the scale on the right side of the image. I hope this clears my statement up.

As for another type of energy over exposing the device I understand what you mean but as a developer of imaging systems I have never seen it with this technology but I suppose it is possible.

I still maintain that the Iraq footage is light pillars. The conditions in the desert at night accommodate the effect, they are positioned above light sources, they are stationary, and they look exactly like an ordinary light pillar. If it quacks like a duck...

I guess in the end we all get to choose what we believe we see because its not us right there to poke it with a stick.

Excellent knowledge about Tesla by the way!



Edit cause I messed up the image link

[edit on 16-7-2009 by dainoyfb]

reply to post by dainoyfb



If you do capture a UFO let us know.
With your equipment we would like to see non birds in flight.
If the lines were cause by UFOs in hover I would think they were
standing around for quite awhile to energize the air above them.
Supposedly the faster they go the brighter they become.
Must be some rule in the theory.
Some videos show them sparking off light in a disabled unsteady hover.
Other wise in day time hover under steady conditions the UFO
might show up a dark spot.
One photographer used night video in daylight to capture UFOs.
That was in "Greatest Story Ever Denied UFO"

ED: Thanks, I'm still checking out Tesla and the UFO theories.


[edit on 7/16/2009 by TeslaandLyne]

reply to post by easynow


The red hue on top and green on bottom can be seen on many
videos of bright objects in daytime skies.
The object light must be very bright to flood out the camera.
Lets say lightning bright.

We could be seeing an atom smashing or atom orbit smashing / exciting
voltage that actually has the air gasses emitting their own high energy
state light emissions.

The Earth has these north and south pole glows and the object must
have the same powerful effect with the voltages Tesla continually
made.