It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


Preparing for civil unrest

page: 1

log in


posted on Jul, 13 2009 @ 11:38 AM

The most remarkable thing about civil unrest is that there hasn't been more of it.

Politicians are making a hash of this country—and much of the rest of the civilized world. We know it. They know it. They know we know it. But we don't feel we can do anything much to stop them.

That right there is the pre-condition for civil unrest—when people are frustrated and politicians are nervous.

Worse, that was how things stood before last fall's crash. Before pols on both left and right launched the biggest mass transfer of wealth in history—transferring our wealth (what we had left of it!) to their friends on Wall Street and in the banking industry. In other words, that's how things were before things got bad!

Now everybody's talking about the ongoing catastrophe (even if we are in a momentarily sunny mood). But almost nobody is talking about the logical—maybe even inevitable—consequences of cynical or desperate politicians abusing an already fed-up populace: civil unrest.

I mean people taking to the streets. Or mass resistance. Or crackdowns because the government fears we might do something to upset its apple cart. It's going to happen. Somewhere. At some time. It's going to.

One of the few VIPs to mention the matter openly was Zbigniew Brzezinski, former National Security Advisor and the ultimate insider's insider. He commented on the millions of unemployed or soon-to-be-unemployed and the "...public awareness of this extraordinary wealth that was transferred to a few individuals at levels without historical precedent in America." He told "Morning Joe" Scarborough, "Hell, there could be even riots." I'd say that's an understatement.

Here are my definitions of levels of civil unrest and a little bit about how they might affect us:

LEVEL ONE: The lowest level of civil unrest is when people turn on their own neighborhoods—as happened during the race riots of the 1960s and the Rodney King riots in Los Angeles. Level One civil unrest can be deadly and destructive, but primarily to people who live, work, or must travel in the immediate area. Level One unrest is spontaneous, Dionysian, is confined to a narrow geographical zone where the protestors live. Police response may be harsh, but it's localized. Unless you're in the middle of it, you're unaffected.

LEVEL TWO: Level Two civil unrest may also be focused on a single area. But in this case, rioters or protesters have deliberately targeted a business district, a facility, a transportation system, or an organization to impose maximum disruption. One example: the World Trade Organization protests in Seattle in 1999; young people with violence in mind and rage in their hearts attacked an entire downtown, affecting hundreds of businesses and tens of thousands of workers who hardly knew what hit them. Another example: This spring, protesters in Thailand shut down the Bangkok airport, affecting who knows how many individuals and businesses. Level Two unrest is usually planned or semi-planned. The target is chosen deliberately. Although still focused in one area, Level Two can disrupt normal life and business in a whole region or country.

LEVEL THREE: Level Three comes when mass unrest or authoritarian crackdown causes disruption at state or regional level. Then, no matter what the original cause or location of the trouble, everyone in the region is affected. Effects might include travel restrictions, random ID checks, mass arrests, food and fuel rationing, controls on money and banking, roadblocks, and other harsh "emergency" restrictions.

LEVEL FOUR: Level Four is Level Three—but on a national or even international scale. It's martial law. If things ever get this bad, it's likely that the government itself will be a far bigger threat to everyone's well being than whatever the original cause of the clampdown was.

And of course, any level of civil unrest can lead to laws, regulations, and harsher police policies that end up affecting everybody in the long run.

Great article by Claire Wolfe. Lots of food for thought and some great tips on what to do if you see things crumbling.

Some of us already have lines in the sand that would inspire us to resist abuses of authority. And that, right there, is something our would-be masters fear—our disobedience. What will happen? And when? Nobody has a crystal ball. But the combination of public frustration and governmental apprehension is an explosive one. Someday, somebody will light the match.

posted on Jul, 13 2009 @ 11:46 AM
Lucky for us they made us a schedule which I will now post.

Now use the NLE's in the calendar posted to link them with the events depicted in the NWO Illuminatti Card Game.

posted on Jul, 13 2009 @ 12:33 PM
It's those good old level 1 events we want to avoid, those are the ones that ultimately make us weaker, destroying our own neighbourhoods and local infrastructure will never get us anywhere.

Here in the UK, seen nothing of it either, it's strange, maybe they've won? We've got an increasing amount of unemployed and educated unemployed at that, sometimes living hand-to-mouth. But, it's ok, we've got tv and cheap alcohol to keep us occupied.

This is only half tongue in cheek, but I think the biggest threat to the PTB would be TV going down and/or the web, of course the web going down would be a great problem for organisation of any resistance type movement.

Slowly it creeps closer.

posted on Jul, 13 2009 @ 12:35 PM
reply to post by jokei

Yes. I do wonder what "domestic non-terror" entails. Thats probably when they come and kick down doors for no reason.

posted on Jul, 13 2009 @ 12:45 PM
Civil unrest will not happen on a large enough scale until we can get fluorine out of water, un-mandate vaccines, and stop people from taking anti-depressants/psychotics.

posted on Jul, 13 2009 @ 01:02 PM
Not much of a surprise, stats for survivalist communities online have been soaring in the past few years. Pretty much every sign out there points to the fact that people are making ready for a SHTF scenario and given the economic news its not an unwise move really...

posted on Jul, 13 2009 @ 01:05 PM

Originally posted by BenIndaSun
Civil unrest will not happen on a large enough scale until we can get fluorine out of water, un-mandate vaccines, and stop people from taking anti-depressants/psychotics.

A 48 hour interruption of vital services would be more than enough to drive the people to unrest and beyond. Imagine all of LA or San Francisco without electricity for at least 48 hours. All the food in people's refrigerators would go bad, supermarkets would suffer the same spoilage, and people would start to panic since most folks keep no more than 1 to 2 weeks worth of food on hand (and much of it requiring refrigeration).

posted on Jul, 13 2009 @ 01:21 PM
?what can good citizens do to turn things around without the use of violence ? Iwatch this once great nation slideing farther away from the rightsproved by our constitution. Incramentally piece by piece , or by International treaties that will supercede our constitution . we have seen our president bowdown to leaders of nations,why?. agreements are made that harm americans and we are not given a opportunity to VOTE up or down these treaties/agreements IE, NAFTA CAFTA WTO UNITED NATIONS ETC. WHATcan we do ? nothing but suck it up and try to survive. IT is very frustrating 4 those of us who can see through the smoke and BS IM MAD AS HELL AND I DONT KNOW IF I CAN TAKE IT ANY MORE. where can i find likeminded people? Iwatch as illegals S??? ALLOVER US and all gvmnt want to legalize LAWBREAKERS. you break the law and c what happens MABEY ITS TIME 4 A TEA PARTY

new topics

top topics


log in