It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Proof Hez video Fake

page: 1
9
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jul, 13 2009 @ 04:36 AM
link   


Only on 9/11 steel buildings has the ability to hit non moving aluminium "planes" and swallow it completely,lol.

Its the building that moves, not the "plane", lol.

The animators did a bad job on Hez video and they know it, so they are panicking trying to cover it up, hahaha good luck with that.

Do you guys understand that we were shown FAKE videos?

Quack
D.Duck

BTW: Lets see how the agents will handle this one, please watch and learn,haha.

[edit on 13-7-2009 by D.Duck]




posted on Jul, 13 2009 @ 05:00 AM
link   
Well spotted D.D.



posted on Jul, 13 2009 @ 07:05 AM
link   
Still no reply from the Agents, bet they are doing some huge googling atm, this will take some debunking.

/popcorn.



posted on Jul, 13 2009 @ 07:44 AM
link   
Oh my goodness , watch the video again

www.youtube.com...

i can do that to any video i want, all you have to do is Stabilize the video

geez , do you really think a plane didn't hit it

here is an example

www.youtube.com...

[edit on 13-7-2009 by dino1989]



posted on Jul, 13 2009 @ 08:41 AM
link   
reply to post by dino1989
 



Well Dino,

You think the gif is stabilized.

Then you would not have a problem unStabilize the gif or the video and make the plane move insted of the building , so please go ahead and do it.

I love to see this,hahaha.


Good Luck
D.Duck



posted on Jul, 13 2009 @ 09:06 AM
link   
reply to post by D.Duck
 


what the hell? just look at the JFK video it looks like the car stopped and the street is moving

please please stop being silly



posted on Jul, 13 2009 @ 09:32 AM
link   
reply to post by dino1989
 


Dino,

I am talking about the Hez video not the Zapruder video of JFK so please stay on topic but I will come back to the Zapruder video later.

You said the reason the gif I have showed that makes the building move and the "plane" stand still is because it is stabilized.

You said you can do it anytime so please unStabilize it for me and show me that its the "plane" that is moving.

You just have to take the frames from the "plane" enters the building, because thats where the illusion of a camera panning starts.

On more time Dino, Good Luck with that.


Quack
D.Duck



posted on Jul, 13 2009 @ 09:33 AM
link   
I`m no video editing expert but how exactly can you make the building move whilst not affecting the trajectory of the plane to compensate, in a live video (supposedly) capture?.



posted on Jul, 13 2009 @ 09:55 AM
link   
reply to post by Seventh
 



Seventh,

Excellent question.

The whole Hez video is made in a computer and has nothing to do with a real camera.

So to make the illusion that the "camera" is panning or zooming, this is what you get,lol.

Its like the cartoons and you see a plane fly from east to west, you have the plane stand still and move the background.


Best
D.Duck


[edit on 13-7-2009 by D.Duck]

[edit on 13-7-2009 by D.Duck]



posted on Jul, 13 2009 @ 06:08 PM
link   

Originally posted by D.Duck
You said you can do it anytime so please unStabilize it for me and show me that its the "plane" that is moving.

Here's 43 different angles of the plane moving:







Originally posted by D.Duck
The whole Hez video is made in a computer

Oh really? So you obtained a copy of the original and had it professionally tested in a lab and the lab confirmed the footage was made on a computer? I would love to see this proof please, otherwise deceptive, untruthful disinfo abounds.



Originally posted by D.Duck
Its like the cartoons and you see a plane fly from east to west, you have the plane stand still and move the background.

Yes, because it's so much easier in CGI to move the entire background than it is to move just a single object in the foreground.[/sarcasm]

It's like there's a contest with the no-planers to come up with the stupidest, most unbelievable ideas that can't possibly be proven, then they try to pass them off as fact and proof.

You haven't proven anything by posting a single animated image other than it shows a plane hitting a building. In this reality, we know that buildings don't move and that planes do. For someone to say otherwise would suggest that either that person is not from this reality, or they have strong mental deficiencies.



posted on Jul, 13 2009 @ 06:14 PM
link   

Originally posted by Seventh
Still no reply from the Agents, bet they are doing some huge googling atm, this will take some debunking.

This is one of the most ridiculous, unbelievable theories that the no-plane disinfo cult has come up with to date. So don't think for a minute that just because nobody replied, that the NPT disinfo in this thread is fact and nobody can debunk it. Truth of the matter is, nobody wants to give this garbage the light of day or even acknowledge the existance of it.

Make sure you keep that in the back of your head.



posted on Jul, 13 2009 @ 07:39 PM
link   
9/11 MADNESS
post removed because of personal attacks

Click here to learn more about this warning.



posted on Jul, 13 2009 @ 07:49 PM
link   

Originally posted by _BoneZ_

Originally posted by Seventh
Still no reply from the Agents, bet they are doing some huge googling atm, this will take some debunking.

This is one of the most ridiculous, unbelievable theories that the no-plane disinfo cult has come up with to date. So don't think for a minute that just because nobody replied, that the NPT disinfo in this thread is fact and nobody can debunk it. Truth of the matter is, nobody wants to give this garbage the light of day or even acknowledge the existance of it.

Make sure you keep that in the back of your head.


WOW I completely agree with BoneZ.


When stuff like this suddenly starts appearing here frequently..I have to wonder what board out there just banned all the maniacal fringe.



posted on Jul, 13 2009 @ 11:23 PM
link   
Hahaha this is really funny.

Not one of the debunking agents trying to debunk has showed there is something wrong with the gif I showed you guys, and do you know why?

THEY CANT BECAUSE HEZ VIDEO IS FAKE AND THEY KNOW IT.

The best debunking attempt comes from "The Dispatcherator" he just wants everyone to see the whole Hez video again and fall for the illusion again, not very bright,hahaha.

BoneZ is doing his thing he always do and that is trying to steer things away from the gif and talk about a lot of other stuff.

So once again debunkers, stay on topic:

Show me the sequence in Hez video where the "plane" is about to be swallowed by the tower that the "plane is moving and not the tower.

Remember the "plane" was supposed to travel 560 MPH.


Quack
D.Duck




[edit on 13-7-2009 by D.Duck]



posted on Jul, 14 2009 @ 12:24 AM
link   
reply to post by D.Duck
 

Great job!

I seldom see anything truly outstanding in the way of observation in these forums but star and flag for you, man.

I've seen that footage so many times and knew it was wrong, but could only come up with the obvious reasons for that, i.e., that the plane slides into the building without so much as a sign of stress on the fuselage, etc., but your .gif makes the point about animation crystal clear.

When people look at it they should think of the way that the entry point of the fuselage is so distant from the point where the tail of the fuselage is finally swallowed. lol !!! It's impossible given the angle of attack. The fuselage should be literally shredding itself across the face of the building.

Edit: Watched again, calipers at the ready and obviously the above paragraph is not correct. There is some peculiar movement at the impact point as the fuselage goes in but it is not as pronounced as I said above and seems to be a lurch to the left rather than to the right.

I still think the video is fake. Just look at the right wing as it disappears into the building. But the point that the OP is making is not as obvious to me. Hence the edits to this post. (No excuses, just a brain cramp on my part.)

Something may have flown into those buildings, but whoever was controlling that something didn't want it to be closely examined.



[edit on 14-7-2009 by ipsedixit]



posted on Jul, 14 2009 @ 04:18 AM
link   

Originally posted by D.Duck
Its the building that moves, not the "plane", lol.


There is no difference between the two. We've known about this for at least 350 years. There is a famous quote attributed to Einstein on the subject. [edit - don't think that quote was verbatim, it's in a book I have somewhere!]

[edit on 14-7-2009 by exponent]



posted on Jul, 14 2009 @ 05:59 AM
link   

Originally posted by _BoneZ_

Originally posted by Seventh
Still no reply from the Agents, bet they are doing some huge googling atm, this will take some debunking.

This is one of the most ridiculous, unbelievable theories that the no-plane disinfo cult has come up with to date. So don't think for a minute that just because nobody replied, that the NPT disinfo in this thread is fact and nobody can debunk it. Truth of the matter is, nobody wants to give this garbage the light of day or even acknowledge the existance of it.

Make sure you keep that in the back of your head.


Woah hold your horses
, i`m not a NPT or any other categorized group relating to 9/11. This is how I saw that video......

1. Everyone knows that the OS from that fateful day contradicts, overlooks, and completely disregards certain aspects to the point of stating it has no knowledge of them whatsoever..... fact.

2. If something is afoot with the events of that day, wether it be something disguised or intended to look like a plane then as there are independent videos that show a plane, then these are prone to close scrutiny, as by all accounts a video depicting something that may or may not have happened by a none government employed person could be the weak link in the armour.

3. So when I see a video supposedly showing the plane (live) that appears to be insignificant as it`s very short, but clearly depicts what appears to be some form of editing then to me it needs some form of clarification.

Hope this clears things up
.



posted on Jul, 14 2009 @ 08:28 AM
link   

Originally posted by Seventh
but clearly depicts what appears to be some form of editing
Hope this clears things up
.

It doesn't clear anything up. How does the animated image in the OP "clearly depict some form of editing"? We know that buildings don't slam into planes, so how can anyone seriously consider this BS? What, all of New York City was moving and slammed into stationary planes in the air? Give me a break. The NPT disinfo artist cult continuously makes things up out of thin air and then tries to pass it off as truth and there are a few gullible idiots that actually believe it.

I could start up my own disinfo cult. I could say Godzilla destroyed the WTC. I could say that the large holes found in the smaller WTC buildings were from Godzilla's feet:




I don't need any more proof than that. I don't need images or videos of Godzilla actually destroying the WTC, nor do I need witnesses to have seen Godzilla because I can just call all the witnesses liars just like the NPT disinfo artists do. All I have to do is get a few idiots to believe that it's possible and then start spreading it around and there you have a disinfo cult just like the NPT disinfo cult.

When someone claims to have recorded a "real" UFO on video, producers of these UFO programs obtain the originals and have them analyzed by several video studios for fakery. Until the NPT disinfo cult starts obtaining the original videos and having them professionally analyzed for fakery, then every single thing they say is meaningless, baseless, disinformation.

It baffles me to no end that people entertain this BS with zero proof whatsoever except for the word of a few disinfo artists.



posted on Jul, 14 2009 @ 11:46 AM
link   

Originally posted by Seventh
Still no reply from the Agents, bet they are doing some huge googling atm, this will take some debunking.

/popcorn.


As an NWO agent in good standing I would like to say that I don't waste time with prima facie stupidity. I think _bonez_ has covered it well enough.



posted on Jul, 15 2009 @ 04:30 PM
link   
reply to post by 911files
 


Sure you think BoneZ covered it all because thats what you are paid to say, and when we all read what he had to say there is no question Hez video is fake.

Hahaha, why dont you agents just try to explain what is happening in the gif.

I am waiting.

D.Duck


Edit: To all you non agents: Please watch the gif in my first post and tell me if you get it that Hez video is fake, Thanks.


[edit on 15-7-2009 by D.Duck]

[edit on 15-7-2009 by D.Duck]



new topics

top topics



 
9
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join