It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Archon_Adept
reply to post by Mumbotron
More subjective, unsubstantiated nonsense from a pro-zionist. How surprising.
Originally posted by Archon_Adept
reply to post by Mumbotron
There are plenty of vocal Americans who reject the wars. You can easily find them on the internet and independent media. Show Israelis who reject what Israel is doing? Where's their voice?
Originally posted by ProtoplasmicTraveler
my dislike of Israel as a nation, and Zionists, really is just a dislike of the Israeli nation and Zionists.
The MOSSAD (active in all port cities everywhere) even has me on it's protected species list Mike and chuckles at my towering ability to attract static electricity on any subject.
Originally posted by Oeden
Again, it's easier to scapegoat the poor jews for everything though instead of actually using your own brain just like it's easier to scapegoat all the arabs for being terrorists.
Originally posted by NoamC
reply to post by ZombieOctopus
yes, you are anti-semetic. only the Quran speaks of converting the infidels or killing them. so does the new testament
The Deception Continues
Modern scholars of Judaism have not only continued the deception, but have actually improved upon the old rabbinical methods, both in impudence and in mendacity. I omit here the various histories of antisemitism, as unworthy of serious consideration, and shall give just three particular examples and one general example of the more modern 'scholarly' deceptions.
In 1962, a part of the Maimonidean Code referred to above, the so-called Book of Knowledge, which contains the most basic rules of Jewish faith and practice, was published in Jerusalem in a bilingual edition, with the English translation facing the Hebrew text.20 The latter has been restored to its original purity, and the command to exterminate Jewish infidels appears in it in full: 'It is a duty to exterminate them with one's own hands.' In the English translation this is somewhat softened to: 'It is a duty to take active measures to destroy them.' But then the Hebrew text goes on to specify the prime examples of 'infidels' who must be exterminated: 'Such as Jesus of Nazareth and his pupils, and Tzadoq and Baitos 21 and their pupils, may the name of the wicked rot'. Not one 'word of this appears in the English text on the facing page (78a). And, even more significant, in spite of the wide circulation of this book among scholars in the English-speaking countries, not one of them has, as far as I know, protested against this glaring deception.
Source
Originally posted by Archon_Adept
reply to post by Oeden
Where's a link? Show me an Israeli leader who rejects what's happening in Israel? Obama went in front of AIPAC and pledged absolute support for Israel. Show me footage of an Israeli supporting America. Show me an Israeli who says Christians and Jews are friends. Just one. Go ahead.
Originally posted by Mumbotron
Originally posted by Archon_Adept
reply to post by Oeden
Where's a link? Show me an Israeli leader who rejects what's happening in Israel? Obama went in front of AIPAC and pledged absolute support for Israel. Show me footage of an Israeli supporting America. Show me an Israeli who says Christians and Jews are friends. Just one. Go ahead.
A link of an Israeli leader who opposes his own policies, not likely. Like I said the actions of the Israeli military have always been controlled by special interests (non-Jewish) and Israel itself wouldn't be where it is today in fulfillment of Bibical end times prophecies if it weren't for a small group of international bankers making that choice. You are a confused person. I'm sticking to the assumption that you come from a small town and haven't ever met a Jewish person. Take it from me- or don't, Jews and Christians ARE friends.
Originally posted by Mdv2
Originally posted by NoamC
reply to post by ZombieOctopus
yes, you are anti-semetic. only the Quran speaks of converting the infidels or killing them. so does the new testament
You are sure?
The Deception Continues
Modern scholars of Judaism have not only continued the deception, but have actually improved upon the old rabbinical methods, both in impudence and in mendacity. I omit here the various histories of antisemitism, as unworthy of serious consideration, and shall give just three particular examples and one general example of the more modern 'scholarly' deceptions.
Source
Cannot confirm nor deny this, but it certainly is an interesting question whether it's true or not.
en.wikipedia.org...
Shahak's works have found a receptive audience among neo-Nazis, antisemites and Holocaust deniers, and his articles and the full texts of his works can be found on websites such as Radio Islam, Bible Believers, Jew Watch, CODOH, and "Historical Review Press". David Duke mourned Shahak, stating he had exposed "numerous examples of hateful Judaic laws... that permit Jews to cheat, to steal, to rob, to kill, to rape, to lie, even to enslave Christians,"and dedicated his book Jewish Supremacism to him. Duke's antisemitic theories defaming the Talmud and Judaism drew on material from the works of Shahak and Elizabeth Dilling.
Shahak has been accused of fabricating incidents, "blaming the victim", distorting the normative meaning of Jewish texts, and misrepresenting Jewish belief and law. According to Paul Bogdanor, Shahak "regaled his audience with a stream of outrageous libels, ludicrous fabrications, and transparent hoaxes. As each successive allegation was exposed and discredited, he would simply proceed to a new invention." Ari Alexander, co-founder of the Children of Abraham Organization for Jewish-Islamic dialogue, while noting the widespread use of Shahak's works by neo-Nazis and in Arab countries, concludes that:
'the texts that Shahak cites are real (though Shahak's sporadic use of footnotes makes it difficult to check all of them). Oftentimes, the interpretation of these texts is debatable and their prominence in Judaism negligible, but nonetheless, they are part of Jewish tradition and, therefore, cannot be ignored.'
I've caused my own entrapment on this site. Came here because of genuine interest in a lot of non-mainstream subjects and there are informed people. I've worked as a journalist in the past, and being able to do Q & A with knowledgeable people real time is a dream.