It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

The Gay Agenda---Making America A Little More Gay Everyday!

page: 17
48
<< 14  15  16    18  19  20 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jul, 13 2009 @ 12:02 AM
link   
reply to post by zazzafrazz
 


I personally believe that most of those "priests" are closet homosexuals. They weren't targeting little girls afterall.

The fact that they were males targeting/preying on/acting out against lit'l males makes them homosexual pedophiles.




posted on Jul, 13 2009 @ 12:02 AM
link   
reply to post by nomorecruelty
 


OF YOUR CHOICE.
Not your choice. You've made your choice. Leave everyone else's choices alone, regarding heaven and hell and sinning and whatever. You keep talking like it's your business if other people sin.

I think that's between them and God. Right?



posted on Jul, 13 2009 @ 12:03 AM
link   

Originally posted by northexpedition
Now that homosexuality is the "in" thing, because it's so rebellious and "new" I theorize that paeodphilia and bestiality are next in line for equal rights.


Are you kidding?

How do animals and children equate?

How do consenting adults warrant an accusation of peodophilia and beastiality?

Hint: They don't.

Abstract an inadequate associations...



posted on Jul, 13 2009 @ 12:03 AM
link   
reply to post by nomorecruelty
 


Well I would say that heterosexuals are just as guilty as homosexuals in regards to pedophillic behavior. So it isnt fair to just attribute it to homosexuals. Look at all the teachers who have pedophillic heterosexual affairs with their students.



posted on Jul, 13 2009 @ 12:04 AM
link   
reply to post by grapesofraft
 


That's not even remotely possible, i'd go bat crap crazy on anyone who touched my kids... kids are treated like an endangered species in our society... pedophilia will never be socially acceptable

Being homosexual is not something that harms others...pedophillia is there is no comparison



posted on Jul, 13 2009 @ 12:04 AM
link   
reply to post by grapesofraft
 


That is a ridiculous comment
There is a depowering of children they have no choice
therefore it wont be accepeted. I cant see children petitioning to allow it can you?


Being gay doesnt make u a peed.
Teh arguemnt for equality is nothign alike.



posted on Jul, 13 2009 @ 12:05 AM
link   

Originally posted by grapesofraft
reply to post by schrodingers dog
 


I read through part of it but i think I am missing your point. Could you tell me what you expect me to glean from it?


Ok ... let me quote the part I believe is applicable:


Let's imagine an ordinary eighteen year old girl. Let's call her Maria.
Now let's imagine that Maria was born and raised under three different scenarios:

Life 1: She is born and raised in Thailand, under relative poverty, and is now a prostitute in Bangkok. The law in Thailand is clear, if you register with the state and take monthly std tests, it is legal to work as a prostitute. Not only that but the profession does not even carry much stigma. It is definitely considered neither illegal nor deviant. It is simply within the norm of their society. source

Life 2: She is born and raised in the US under the same circumstances. But as prostitution is illegal, she spends her time in and out of jail. She is considered by society as low level criminal and some people might label her deviant.

Life 3: She is born in Saudi Arabia. You can see where this is going. Let's assume that a sequence of events leads her to one night take money from a man for sex and the man rats her out. Imagine the way that society would judge and punish her. Their custom is to to jail victims of gang rapes. source

So what do we have. The girl (subject) is the same in all three cases, that is to say that her genes are are the same no matter which country she happened to born into. The only difference between the three lives are the societies which is to say the "observers" in which she was born. And in each case, the individually and collectively assign criminality and deviance onto her, the only constant "subject" in all three lives.
www.abovetopsecret.com...

I realize we're talking of another "sin" but the principle is the same.

That is to say that no matter what anyone chooses to believe, no behavior in this universe, human or otherwise, has what one might call a 'true' nature.

The universe is neutral, without position, without dogma, beliefs, positions, concepts, judgments, interpretation, etc.

ALL of these things lie on the side of the observer, and how he/she interprets such actions is mostly based on learned behavior from culture, tv, religion, school, language, century, etc.

So there is no such thing as sin, or normal, until someone decides to interpret something as such.

Not that there's anything wrong with it, one can judge away if one must ...

However one thing is certain, a person perceiving it doesn't make it so.

If one want top get even more in depth at the uselessness of such positions, consider this: www.abovetopsecret.com...

I hope I explained it better.



posted on Jul, 13 2009 @ 12:05 AM
link   
reply to post by jeasahtheseer
 


Just because I live around gays doesn't mean I have to accept their behavior. If I lived in a neighborhood with gangs and drug dealers, does that mean I have to accept THEIR behavior?

You can't believe I live in the bay? I moved here from Texas, because I like the weather and the scenery. Tell me that as a conservative I don't have a right just as much as anybody else to enjoy this part of the world? Your defininition of acceptance is very exclusionary. As long as you aren't a conservative, it is acceptable to live in San Francisco? Give me a break. I know an old guy who lived here in the 50s and said it used to be a normal town. Suddenly all the drugs and liberals arrived in the 60s and it's gone way over the line.

I refuse to be told I can't live here and enjoy the nice weather, job opporutinies, HOT WOMEN, biking trails, beautiful forests, I refuse!

Tell me I can't be unique! Tell me I can't be different in this supposedly "diverse" city. YOU make me sick. As long as I am not a liberal, I don't belong here, is what you're saying.



posted on Jul, 13 2009 @ 12:05 AM
link   
reply to post by zazzafrazz
 


Jackson had male magazines in his possession, not girly mags.

Jackson targeted lit'l boys - not lit'l girls.

Jackson was accused by lit'l boy's parents - not lit'l girls.

Jackson could have professed all he wanted - most male pedophiles deny they have a problem anyhow.



posted on Jul, 13 2009 @ 12:07 AM
link   
reply to post by mopusvindictus
 


Well I am not saying it is right to be pedophillic. I would kill an adult that even touched my child in appropriately. What I am saying is that we are going to have to learn to accept that some parents (and you know they are out there) that will allow there little kid to marry a 50 year old man. So I think that in fairness if everyone is in agreement then they will want their rights too and how can we say no, once we have said it was ok.

Realistically, the first thing to go will be polygamy as it is hard to make a case against multiple spouses once you have given rights to homosexuals. Then that would lead to like man, woman, man, woman, woman marriage.

We need to prepared ourselves to be ready to tolerate these things, if we are going to be fair to everyone.

Edit to change bigomy to polygamy...lmao/



[edit on 13-7-2009 by grapesofraft]



posted on Jul, 13 2009 @ 12:08 AM
link   
Being gay is not natural, because every gay person I have known is very picky on cleanliness and appearance (and boy does it get results) whereas the average man is a lazy slob who hates bathing
personally I have been over a week without a shower (in training but still haha).

Also thank you to every gay man out there because you guys would be our highest competition for girls



posted on Jul, 13 2009 @ 12:08 AM
link   
reply to post by grapesofraft
 


I wasn't attributing it to just homosexuals...... there are homosexual pedophiles and heterosexual pedophiles.


Both are sick individuals.

My personal opinion is that Jackson was a homosexual pedophile.



posted on Jul, 13 2009 @ 12:10 AM
link   
reply to post by nomorecruelty
 


CHild moolestation is predomintly a crime commited by a hetrosexual family member / male
Period. The stats prove it over and over again.
I dont care about MJ.

Im saynig dont find one example and claim it the 'norm'

CHildren are mostly molested by their fathers, uncles and brothers who abuse children, not repressed gays.
come on!

As for preists being repressed gays....
Peeds joined the cloth as they had access to children, being a preist didnt make them gay nor peeds/.
Same with those that become teachers...they go into a profession where they have access to children.
Get off peodophilia and gay. they are not the same.
one is a crime
athe other is a expression of human choice.


[edit on 13-7-2009 by zazzafrazz]



posted on Jul, 13 2009 @ 12:10 AM
link   
reply to post by grapesofraft
 


I'm not on the planet to be "fair" to people - if the Bible says it's wrong, then it's something I don't wish to have to see or be around.

Like an earlier poster wrote, what happens when the bestiality agenda comes knocking - are we supposed to be "fair" to them as well?

Sorry, I''ll remain politically incorrect.



posted on Jul, 13 2009 @ 12:10 AM
link   
reply to post by nomorecruelty
 


Well I didnt mean any offense. I was just pointing that out because people who are in support of gay marriage often think that when you say it will lead to pedophillia, they assume you are saying that all homosexuals are pedophiles. So I just wanted to clear that up.



posted on Jul, 13 2009 @ 12:10 AM
link   
just saw the thread and wanted to step in and support my fellow straight men


not enough people are doing that these days


now dont get me wrong, im not homophobic, i dont hate all gays

i dont have a problem with anyone being gay

what i have a problem with is the constant in your face flamboyant gayness that plagues the media and out streets


for example, i havent seen the movie, but ive seen the image and the previews for bruno

even though hes a character, hes a character thats very realistic in todays world and its pathetic

if you want to be gay, fine

im all for equality


but stop forcing it into the face of everyone

its that flamboyant idiocy that makes people homophobic, and honestly when i see some of these people acting in that way, i honestly understand why theres violence against gays, i dont condone it, but i understand it


not only is the flamboyance incredibly annoying and disgusting so are the extremists on the gay agenda

ya know the kind, the ones demanding compassion and understanding at the same time screaming in the face of a little old lady at a protest because she disagrees with them

they want to be equal and have the right to be themselves but they dont want to allow that same basic right to those who oppose them and wish to speak out against them

the one big thing holding homosexuality down is the immaturity of those who represent the group


now are all gays classified in the groups ive mentioned, no not at all, theres people who are gay whom youd never realize


they are respectable, responsible, mature, compassionate people, who are having their way of life trampled by extremist fools





interesting, sounds just like the extremist religious jerks

maybe humanity should practice moderation as it seems its the extremists in every group that cause the problems

[edit on 13-7-2009 by Dramey]



posted on Jul, 13 2009 @ 12:11 AM
link   
reply to post by MemoryShock
 


Not really. Once you cross the line of normal heterosexuality, the biological foundation of the world we live in, the foundation of the family, you immediately have paedophiles and donkey rapers saying "what about US! We want special protection for our strange behavior!"

People say, as long as it harms nobody, who cares right? The truth is, it DOES harm people. It harms society as a whole and very ancient beliefs of family.

When we begin giving rights to deviants, we have to then give rights to every deviant.

If nobody stands up against this satanic weapon being used in the spiritual war aganist humanity, then who will? What every happened to opposing something ON PRINCIPLE? We will not go quietly into the night. We will not give into the New World Order social engineers.

I think there's a Nietzsche quote that goes something like this:

"What was a sin in the past is promoted as virtue today."

It's very obvious homosexuality has gone far beyond "genetic." When I was in high school, we had maybe 1 or 2 open gays. I would say 99% of people were straight. Now I asked my brother a few years ago, what's it like in his high school. He said there were like 20 or so people he could think of that engage in that sick lifestyle.

That's all it is, a lifestyle. A vice, an indulgence. It's not a life creator.

[edit on 13-7-2009 by northexpedition]



posted on Jul, 13 2009 @ 12:12 AM
link   
reply to post by nomorecruelty
 


Well you are not saying that even homosexual marriage is right so of course you can disagree with the others. For those of us who are trying to be more tolerant then in fairness we need to let other people be free to make the choice of marrying who or what they want.



posted on Jul, 13 2009 @ 12:12 AM
link   

Originally posted by northexpedition
reply to post by jeasahtheseer
 


Just because I live around gays doesn't mean I have to accept their behavior. If I lived in a neighborhood with gangs and drug dealers, does that mean I have to accept THEIR behavior?

You can't believe I live in the bay? I moved here from Texas, because I like the weather and the scenery. Tell me that as a conservative I don't have a right just as much as anybody else to enjoy this part of the world? Your defininition of acceptance is very exclusionary. As long as you aren't a conservative, it is acceptable to live in San Francisco? Give me a break. I know an old guy who lived here in the 50s and said it used to be a normal town. Suddenly all the drugs and liberals arrived in the 60s and it's gone way over the line.

I refuse to be told I can't live here and enjoy the nice weather, job opporutinies, HOT WOMEN, biking trails, beautiful forests, I refuse!

Tell me I can't be unique! Tell me I can't be different in this supposedly "diverse" city. YOU make me sick. As long as I am not a liberal, I don't belong here, is what you're saying.


No I am not saying you shouldn't be here. That is wrong, and I shouldn't have said that, I apoligize. We are supposed to be all "accepting" here in California, so it was wrong of me to say that.

And yes the girls are hot here and it is a nice place, I know exactly what you mean when it comes to that lol.

The one thing that I just couldn't understand is how a person who seems to HATE gays could live in San Fran. You explained your view, I understand now.

And my family has lived here since the early 1900's and back in the 50s it was still a "bohemian" type of town. Back then it was all "beat poets" and jack kerouac type of people. "Different" people have always gravitated towards the bay area, I don't know why.



[edit on 13-7-2009 by jeasahtheseer]



posted on Jul, 13 2009 @ 12:12 AM
link   
reply to post by grapesofraft
 


No offense taken, my friend


That entire 'gay ped' issue always takes me to the "Man Boy Love" group ...... and they want rights too. Eh, the right to turn out young under age boys.




new topics

top topics



 
48
<< 14  15  16    18  19  20 >>

log in

join