Apologies stu. All i'm saying is, you didn't have to attack the guy for making a claim. It seems a little self-serving to attack his
statements/claims as false, with no proof of your own that his statements are in fact false. These discussions should be used as a way to get to the
bottom of things with the limited "proof" and "evidence" that we have in front of us. I know its been said many times before but, lack of
proof doesn't prove anything.
As far as British MPs having to declare 'those things' publically, what do you mean by "have to"? is it law? can you cite some sources/laws that
require the MPs to actually do this? Honestly, i don't know what the law here is anymore since the government keeps adding new ones and changing old
ones to broadly expand their powers every day.


