It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Vatican believes Bush may be the Anti-Christ

page: 6
0
<< 3  4  5    7 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on May, 11 2004 @ 10:25 AM
link   


Ummmm no.....

Above Top Secret 3.0 Moderators Only Complaints Colonel: Time For De-modding ?

Sorry, you are not permitted to view this forum


yea same here

what gives? all father i didn't know u had access to the mods only forum.....




posted on May, 11 2004 @ 10:26 AM
link   
It was moved thats why



posted on May, 11 2004 @ 10:28 AM
link   

Originally posted by COOL HAND

We can complain all we want and write whomever we want, but the decision to remove you will come from above.



[Edited on 11/5/04 by COOL HAND]

Correct you guys can complain about CF but it all boils down to admin who gets the boot and who doesnt.



posted on May, 11 2004 @ 10:29 AM
link   


I wonder why it's under "Complaints" now. The thread's just to guage public opinion, it's not a complaint. Actually, I'm not really wondering. The snake's trying to minimize damage to his rep. Poor, little, liberal scumpuddle.

i was going to say what drunk said next...



It was moved thats why

why was it moved? i really want to know, and who moved it? and did the colonel move it or did he ask the complainst section mod to move it?


all father said it was to guage puplic opinion, there was to be no governing power behind the thread..... please put it back.

[Edited on 5/11/04 by NothingMakesSense]



posted on May, 11 2004 @ 10:32 AM
link   
It was moved becoause it had nothing to do with politics and as for who moved it cant tell you sorry i dont think i should disclose who moved it.
Now back to your scheduled programme.

[Edited on 11-5-2004 by drunk]



posted on May, 11 2004 @ 10:33 AM
link   
last time i checked the complainst forum wasn't political per se... i understand you not wanting to disclose the name of the mover....


but hey since yur a mod i'll ask you please get rid of Colonel



posted on May, 11 2004 @ 10:34 AM
link   
Look this is not for me to decide.



posted on May, 11 2004 @ 10:36 AM
link   


Look this is not for me to decide.

then who decides? could you please forward my complaint to him/her? do i need to u2u somebody who has that power to remove him? what do i need to do?



posted on May, 11 2004 @ 10:39 AM
link   
Top left hand corner is the complain button click it

Or u2u SkepticOverlord.

Stop derailing threads please.



posted on May, 11 2004 @ 10:39 AM
link   

Originally posted by NothingMakesSense



Look this is not for me to decide.

then who decides? could you please forward my complaint to him/her? do i need to u2u somebody who has that power to remove him? what do i need to do?


Leave drunk alone, a mod cannot get rid of a fellow mod. That would be like one of us getting rid of another poster here.

Again, this is ATS/BTS and not Survivor. People do not get elected off by their peers.

You would probably have to go to at least a Super Moderator. Chances are the ultimate decision would come from Simon as he owns this board (and those who use it ha ha).



posted on May, 11 2004 @ 10:46 AM
link   
Megado, or Megedo or Megadian etc. Is in the valley of the Eupharates River which happens to be smack in the middle (sort of) of IRAQ.



posted on May, 11 2004 @ 10:57 AM
link   
First, I think most of you who oppose the Colonel are a festering bunch of whiney bitches.

Only a few have legs to stand on, because they understand Colonel and think he's abusive. The rest of you lemmings are just on for the ride, and try to shout him down (which will bait him and you know it).

Quit with the bull# tactics. Taking it to the Mods only shows that you can't handle # on your own.

How is it that I, being almost the negative to Colonel in viewpoint, have had quite a number of civil and pleasant (relatively) conversations with him?

I'll lay it out for you. Colonel sees the Republicans as hypocrites because they speak against things like gay marriage, homosexuality in general, infidelity, christian morals, and the like. That being said, it makes it worse for them to be involved in underage boy hookers, infidelity, etc.

Democrates are the ones who prescribe the "Whatever makes you feel good" idea. So it is not hypocritical for them to.

It's the "moral highground" and preaching they do that makes them worse. They defy their own beliefs.

Ah, # it. I don't agree with Colonel most of the time, but quite being the "This one guy didn't agree with the seven of us" types.



posted on May, 11 2004 @ 10:59 AM
link   

Originally posted by robertfenix
Megado, or Megedo or Megadian etc. Is in the valley of the Eupharates River which happens to be smack in the middle (sort of) of IRAQ.


Ummmm no....Megiddo is in Israel

Megiddo is the only archaeological site in Israel that served as the backdrop for a world famous bestseller James Micheners The Source



www.tau.ac.il...


www.nationmaster.com...

Megiddo is a kibbutz in Israel. Megiddo is located near the intersection between highways 65 (from Hadera to Afula) and 66 (going from Haifa south to Samaria), which is called the Megiddo Junction. The junction is the site of a bus terminal and a large military prison for Palestinians convicted of security offences, in most cases and abetting terrorism.



posted on May, 11 2004 @ 01:05 PM
link   

Originally posted by KrazyJethro
First, I think most of you who oppose the Colonel are a festering bunch of whiney bitches.

Only a few have legs to stand on, because they understand Colonel and think he's abusive. The rest of you lemmings are just on for the ride, and try to shout him down (which will bait him and you know it).

Quit with the bull# tactics. Taking it to the Mods only shows that you can't handle # on your own.

How is it that I, being almost the negative to Colonel in viewpoint, have had quite a number of civil and pleasant (relatively) conversations with him?

I'll lay it out for you. Colonel sees the Republicans as hypocrites because they speak against things like gay marriage, homosexuality in general, infidelity, christian morals, and the like. That being said, it makes it worse for them to be involved in underage boy hookers, infidelity, etc.

Democrates are the ones who prescribe the "Whatever makes you feel good" idea. So it is not hypocritical for them to.

It's the "moral highground" and preaching they do that makes them worse. They defy their own beliefs.

Ah, # it. I don't agree with Colonel most of the time, but quite being the "This one guy didn't agree with the seven of us" types.



The problem with your post is that what the Korn Kernal posts as "fact" is nothing but trash and lies, unsubstantiated drivel. When he DOES post a bit of "proof", it's from some bull shiite site that even super left-wingers look at and say, "now that's a load of crap". Then, when the inevitable happens and he is called on the carpet, he starts the abuse, the name calling, and when all else fails he pulls the race card. He did it here in his last post. Talk about a whiney bitches? He is THE whiney bitch.

What you are seeing here, Jethro, is the board finally taking a stand against what they see as a pox on the land. You have NO right to try to quash them. Speak you mind, defend your buddy the Kernal if you like, but allow others to speak their mind as well....



posted on May, 11 2004 @ 02:35 PM
link   
Take it from Jethro I have viewed discussioons and debates between Jethro and the good Colonel, and Jethro is right the members who dont know Colonel very well dont really know his tactics.

I have known Colonel longner than any1 on ATS Colonel and i go way back he doesnt and we ont agree on some issues its just that most ppl dunno how the Colonel gets his points across ppl who are Republicans see it as an insult to be repugnants i mean c'mon guys this is the Mud Pit if you cant stand the heat then get outta the kitchen



posted on May, 11 2004 @ 02:37 PM
link   
Master of science, skilled political negotiator, hailed as a man of peace, initially, prudent, wise, shrewd, very strong and powerful, eloquence of speech, strategize with intrigue.....

Does this sound anything like George W. Busche? If he is the antichrist then we definitly got him licked before he even thinks about taking the throne of GOD!



posted on May, 11 2004 @ 02:46 PM
link   
Fin's got a point.

We do have to take into account the guise that has been passed down through scriptures of the Anti-Christ, it does not fit George W Bush. He has not wooed the world to following his own accord, let alone his own people.

Is Bush really capable of commiting mass genocide ?
Is Bush really dubbing himself Son of God ?

Deep



posted on May, 11 2004 @ 02:59 PM
link   

Originally posted by Affirmative Reaction
The problem with your post is that what the Korn Kernal posts as "fact" is nothing but trash and lies, unsubstantiated drivel.

Is it not the way of this board to introduce articles or ideas, then discuss them? Seems inline with the whole premise of this site. Trash usually has "kernals" of truth in it. Would it be better to dismiss "trash", or to pick out the pieces of truth, and add them to a montage of ideas to form something larger, a greater understanding.

When he DOES post a bit of "proof", it's from some bull shiite site that even super left-wingers look at and say, "now that's a load of crap". Then, when the inevitable happens and he is called on the carpet, he starts the abuse, the name calling, and when all else fails he pulls the race card. He did it here in his last post. Talk about a whiney bitches? He is THE whiney bitch.

Oh I see, must be easy to have the insite some of us do, regardless of political viewpoints, and watch the world seem to crumble in the sickness that it suffers from only to be trounced by numbers. Gang up on anyone, and they flail.

What you are seeing here, Jethro, is the board finally taking a stand against what they see as a pox on the land. You have NO right to try to quash them. Speak you mind, defend your buddy the Kernal if you like, but allow others to speak their mind as well....

Last time I checked, I never denied anyone their chance to speak their minds. Actually, I encourage it, so long as they are open to learn something along the way.

I have an idea. If you think that the article is such a load of #, then just say that, then post the email address of the author (which is conveniently located at the bottom of the article) so people can tell HIM how much it sucks. I'll do your job for you.

WMadsen777@aol.com

There it is. Flame away or scury away, it's your choice. I still reserve the right to think you all are pissants who can't handle themselves in a fight, even when numbers are on your side.




posted on May, 11 2004 @ 03:39 PM
link   

Originally posted by KrazyJethro

Is it not the way of this board to introduce articles or ideas, then discuss them? Seems inline with the whole premise of this site. Trash usually has "kernals" of truth in it. Would it be better to dismiss "trash", or to pick out the pieces of truth, and add them to a montage of ideas to form something larger, a greater understanding.

True. Unfortunately, the Kernal does not adhere to this, and therein lies the problem. When someone DOES put forth a differing point of view, or points out that his "proof" isn't worth the words wasted on it because of it's dubious source, he reverts to "you're all repugnants and racists", and other drivel. There is no "montage of ideas", it's the Kernals way, or the highway. If you don't agree, you get the brunt of his disgusting diatribes.


Oh I see, must be easy to have the insite some of us do, regardless of political viewpoints, and watch the world seem to crumble in the sickness that it suffers from only to be trounced by numbers. Gang up on anyone, and they flail.

When you flame as many people as the Kernal does, you bring the wrath of those you have flamed. He flails because he has no legs to stand on. As you point out below, if he can't handle himself in a fight, he needs to shut up or put up.


Last time I checked, I never denied anyone their chance to speak their minds. Actually, I encourage it, so long as they are open to learn something along the way.

Encourage it? Excuse me? Let me remind you of what you said in your previous post....

You said:
"First, I think most of you who oppose the Colonel are a festering bunch of whiney bitches. "

If that's not an inflammatory way to start your diatribe, I dont know what is...you then went on with...

"Quit with the (c) tactics. Taking it to the Mods only shows that you can't handle (c) on your own. "

I think that says it all. You think those that wish to speak to the mods about an embarrassment to their ranks should not, and tell them not to do it. No encouragement there, that's DIScouragement. Learn something along the way? You mean agree with your point of view, just as the Kernal demands...

I have an idea. If you think that the article is such a load of #, then just say that, then post the email address of the author (which is conveniently located at the bottom of the article) so people can tell HIM how much it sucks. I'll do your job for you.

WMadsen777@aol.com

There it is. Flame away or scury away, it's your choice. I still reserve the right to think you all are pissants who can't handle themselves in a fight, even when numbers are on your side.



Remember, the Kernal started the discussion on this topic, and when he was called on it, he did his usual job of getting nasty. Pissants' eh? Another statement encouraging everyone to share their opinions? You friggin hypocrite. You have now lumped yourself in with the likes of the Kernal. Get used to it.


[Edited on 11-5-2004 by Affirmative Reaction]



posted on May, 11 2004 @ 03:43 PM
link   
Affirmative Reaction,

Do you mind staying in topic and not impeding the flow of this thread please. If you do have a problem I suggest to consult those with authority to appraise your situation.

Now, getting back on topic.........

Deep



new topics

top topics



 
0
<< 3  4  5    7 >>

log in

join