It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Vatican believes Bush may be the Anti-Christ

page: 5
0
<< 2  3  4    6  7 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on May, 11 2004 @ 06:27 AM
link   
I give up. He won't give me straight answer. Which to me means that he has something to hide and he has no basis for calling everyone else "repugnant" and excluding himself. As for "Bush bashing", I see no signs that he thinks republicans are any better. Does anyone know anything about this guy that he isn't telling us? (history, reasons for being chosen for a mod, physcological problems?)




posted on May, 11 2004 @ 06:52 AM
link   

Originally posted by Colonel
To answer this last question. This is the mudpit. There isn't much that I censure. I believe that people should speak freely however they feel


This may be the mudpit, but if you can not debate or argue without resorting to labeling everyone a "repugnant" then you are simply driven by fear.
Do you know what fear is ?

False
Evidence
Appearing
Real

Since you can't sway people to see things your way , or you refuse to see only your view and nothing else, your FEAR drives you to classify everyone something that you fear in yourself; being a repugnant



posted on May, 11 2004 @ 07:16 AM
link   
Another fine mess the Colonel's got us into.
Okay, firstly... Gotta love the Pope, he's quite a cool guy, and yes, Bush was technically brought back from the dead (pretzel incident), and remember the Anti-Christ reference to a "head" wound (which could either be explained by the cut on his face or his severe mental problems).
Still, though... religion is, in the end, superstition, and the book of Revelations was intended to predict 1st century AD happenings. The Anti-Christ is presumably a reference to the Roman Emperor, and the religion known loosely as the Imperial Cult. The mark of the beast is numerical code for the name of a Roman Emperor. The final nail in the coffin is the apocalypse - end of the Roman Empire. The descriptions of the Horsemen are contemporary, and the Armaggedon alludes to an anciet battlefield (in Israel or Jordan, I believe) called "Magedo". In short... I'm saying this is absolute tosh.

Also, the word "repugnant" has been used far too much in this thread, mainly (and erroneously) as a noun, rather than in its true adjective form.

For example: "The Colonel has gone absolutely f***ing wacko, thereby spouting horrendously repugnant arguments."

Or "this repugnant speel has gone too far".

Consider yourselves owned by the All-Father. So, let's put this topic to rest.



posted on May, 11 2004 @ 07:19 AM
link   
*ancient

God damnit...

Oh, and just to add for doubly-powerful effect: "Harrmagedo" is translatable to something like "Mount Magedo" or "Magedo's Hill" or something like that in english.

Hopefully, this will be the end of this bunch of bollocks.



posted on May, 11 2004 @ 07:34 AM
link   

Originally posted by NothingMakesSense
I give up. He won't give me straight answer. Which to me means that he has something to hide and he has no basis for calling everyone else "repugnant" and excluding himself. As for "Bush bashing", I see no signs that he thinks republicans are any better. Does anyone know anything about this guy that he isn't telling us? (history, reasons for being chosen for a mod, physcological problems?)


Shockingly enough, the Colonel is himself a Republican (he refuses to answer to the term repugnant).

See the transformation occur yourself here:
www.belowtopsecret.com...

Other than that I know he is a paralegal.

Just to get back to the topic, I am pretty sure that if the Vatican did in fact believe he was the anti-christ they would mention it to the world. I think they would want to ensure that the leader of the free world is somone other than the anti-christ.



posted on May, 11 2004 @ 07:54 AM
link   
...Thanks for the reference, COOL HAND... Or maybe I should cuss you out for subjecting me to more of the Colonel's boolsheet.

As an unrivalled intellectual and inquisitive mind... I have come up with what I call the definitive Theory of Colonelspeak. I conjecture that the Colonel is an exploratory Assnaut, from a universe wholly apart and fundamentally different from our own, where nonsensical words can be made up willy-nilly, where established words can have their meanings and forms completely altered and poisoned with casual fluidity, where grammar is something to be tangled up until it makes one appear as if they're trying to raise some intellectually-charged point.

Why Col. seems to think only white "repugnants" are worth taking down, rather than being an equal oppurtunities liberal. Of course, political correctness is just inverted racism, just as harmful, twice as underhanded. I'm wondering... will he be taking down the white "repugnants" before or after he uses 'Holocaust - Back By Popular Demand!' billboards in his political campaign ?


...And... HOLY COCKBASTARDS, BATMAN -- DIFFERENTIATION isn't a word. You probably meant "DISTINCTION", or, more fitting to you would be "descrimination" ?



posted on May, 11 2004 @ 07:57 AM
link   
Everyday, I got more losers repugnants on my jock...like ants on candy. BTW, I break down black repugnats too. Ask Tyrrfic. You all are just racist.



posted on May, 11 2004 @ 08:00 AM
link   
Uhhh... I just noticed. The Colonel's blunt ignorance was so physically jarring that it forced me to derail the subject matter, although it's pretty safe to imagine that the original topic of the post is long dead.

People, deny the Colonel's ignorance.

With love, your All-Father



posted on May, 11 2004 @ 08:07 AM
link   

Originally posted by Colonel
Everyday, I got more losers repugnants on my jock...like ants on candy. BTW, I break down black repugnats too. Ask Tyrrfic. You all are just racist.



?meht wonk neve ton od yeht nehw tsicar srehto llac ot sah syawla nosrep a taht ti si yhw



posted on May, 11 2004 @ 08:09 AM
link   
...Colonel, you have no jock. Furthermore, you can't debate for sh**, you pull words out your ass, are too lazy too extend your vocabulary of REAL words past "repugnant", and have a proclivity towards pissing people off with your impudent folly.

You're just a puerile, troublesome, liberal little moan-a-minute. Grow some principles... and a suitable intelligence for debate too, while you're at it.



posted on May, 11 2004 @ 08:12 AM
link   

Originally posted by Colonel
Everyday, I got more losers repugnants on my jock...like ants on candy. BTW, I break down black repugnats too. Ask Tyrrfic. You all are just racist.



Wow, the pot calling the kettle black.

Please show us our racists ways so that we can be better in the future fellow Republican. I am sure that you would not make so bold a statement without ready evidence to back it up?

We're waiting.



posted on May, 11 2004 @ 08:16 AM
link   
He loves to stereotype and assign labels and make the broadest sweeping generalizations possible.

I'll say it once again...THE COLONEL IS THE BIGGEST RACIST ON THIS ENTIRE BOARD.

I will pose the question again: By definition, who is a racist? The person to whom race doesn't matter, or the person for whom race is always an issue?



posted on May, 11 2004 @ 08:28 AM
link   
I think it's safe to say the Colonel is owned. Dude, if I even thought you were capable of renouncing your Demonicrat ways, I would have already offered you the better path. The only salvation you'll ever attain, however, is out the open window of a skyscraper.

Tu comprend, hese ?



posted on May, 11 2004 @ 09:19 AM
link   


I think it's safe to say the Colonel is owned. Dude, if I even thought you were capable of renouncing your Demonicrat ways, I would have already offered you the better path. The only salvation you'll ever attain, however, is out the open window of a skyscraper.

couldn't have said it better myself.

so how do we put in a request that the Colonel's status as moderator be revoked? Some kind of petition? Someone who knows what they are actually doing needs to help me out with this.....



posted on May, 11 2004 @ 09:40 AM
link   
How many times will new repugnants do the same thing? Before you start, let me explain. You repugnants will get a group together to get me de-modded and file a complaint...and then that's pretty much the end of it. I've seen the move already.



posted on May, 11 2004 @ 09:44 AM
link   
SOMEBODY SHUT THIS SOB UP!!



posted on May, 11 2004 @ 09:48 AM
link   

Originally posted by Colonel
How many times will new repugnants do the same thing? Before you start, let me explain. You repugnants will get a group together to get me de-modded and file a complaint...and then that's pretty much the end of it. I've seen the move already.


Is it really in our hands for that? I think not, after all this is a privately owned board. What it might come down to is someone higher than you reading all of these posts and making a decision. We can complain all we want and write whomever we want, but the decision to remove you will come from above.

It isn't like Survivor, as much as we dislike your rhetoric we cannot vote you out of the board.

Just something for you to think about.

BTW way to keep us on the topic that you started. Maybe you should start a new topic where we can call for your removal?

[Edited on 11/5/04 by COOL HAND]



posted on May, 11 2004 @ 10:19 AM
link   
Colonel: Demod The Shallow Liberal!!!

There's the post, homies. Cast thy votes.



posted on May, 11 2004 @ 10:22 AM
link   

Originally posted by All-Father
Colonel: Demod The Shallow Liberal!!!

There's the post, homies. Cast thy votes.


Ummmm no.....


Above Top Secret 3.0 Moderators Only Complaints Colonel: Time For De-modding ?

Sorry, you are not permitted to view this forum



posted on May, 11 2004 @ 10:24 AM
link   
I wonder why it's under "Complaints" now. The thread's just to guage public opinion, it's not a complaint. Actually, I'm not really wondering. The snake's trying to minimize damage to his rep. Poor, little, liberal scumpuddle.



new topics

top topics



 
0
<< 2  3  4    6  7 >>

log in

join