It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
scienceblogs.com...
As noted in this paper one of the peculiarities of the human line is that our cranial capacities have been increasing steadily for about ~2 million years, until they maximized 100-50,000 years ago. In fact, the human lineage with the largest cranial capacity were Neandertals.
www.personalityresearch.org...
Although thousands of years have passed since mankind migrated from Africa and populated the vast expanses of the world, there has been insufficient time for evolution to take effect and modify us to better fit our new environments. Some people believe that in the future we will evolve so that our brains are larger and our cognitive abilities will dramatically increase. The chances of evolving to this level are slim because even if we were given sufficient time to let genetic changes accumulate, there is no pressure to weed out the less intelligent individuals, who actually procreate more than individuals with high IQ's (Kanazawa, 2004).
Originally posted by VitalOverdose
reply to post by Amaterasu
ahh.. just as i thought. You have nothing but your ill conceived opinions and 1 link to someone else's theory. You will have to do better than that im afraid to prove your claims.
Originally posted by Bluebelle
Oh yea I thought about that... people's skin colour changing to suit the enviroment. But that doesnt explain some of the features that specific races seem to have e.g. chinese people having slanted eyes & tend to be quite short etc etc!
Just makes me wonder whether all those different features are really down to just the enviroment or not. And could it be remotely possible that some races are actually the product of some weird human/alien hybrid!
Originally posted by Amaterasu
Well, the Sumerian Tablets offer a quite unambiguous recount of genetically creating humans...
Originally posted by Amaterasu
Interesting facts... There is one animal on this planet that has issues inbreeding. Though other species do show issues, it is many generations before minor issues show up. This animal can show issues in one generation, and the second is highly likely to have severe defects... Also, this animal has over 4,000 "glitches" in their genetics. These pass on genetic disorders. All other animals have maybe a dozen or so at most, and many have none.
That one animal, out of all the species on this planet is us.
If evolution was so good at creating perfect, or nearly perfect genetics... Why did the one animal on the planet that developed intelligence suddenly develop (at the same time) so such an incredible number of issues?
One might suppose that if it was merely evolution, the stock from whence we came was near perfect - by the time we arrived, evolution had created vast numbers of "perfect" species.
Originally posted by Bluebelle
Thats a really good point actually about the genetics thing. And it seems like more and more of these 'glitches' are coming up as time goes on. It does seem odd that we'd develop the kind of intelligence we have, while still having all these dodgy genetics.
Originally posted by Bluebelle
Also, just a thought on evolution in general... how can it be that there are something stupid like 2 million species on this planet, yet we are the only one's who seem to have experienced such an accelerated evolution process (as in the last 3000/4000 years or so)?
And with all species, the main 'objective' seems to be reproduction. Which to a point is the same with us... but we want to explore, learn new things etc. Why is that? Why would that level of intelligence where we want to do those things ever be needed?
Originally posted by VitalOverdose
3 points every decade? that would mean people 500 years ago had an IQ of 0? Yet we know people 1000's of years ago were able to calculate the positions of the stars with no computers. Can you do that seeing as you should be 100's of time more intelligent than them?
I think its the actual IQ test that is flawed. Maybe i should have said 'general intelligence' instead.
Originally posted by suomichris
Originally posted by VitalOverdose
3 points every decade? that would mean people 500 years ago had an IQ of 0? Yet we know people 1000's of years ago were able to calculate the positions of the stars with no computers. Can you do that seeing as you should be 100's of time more intelligent than them?
I think its the actual IQ test that is flawed. Maybe i should have said 'general intelligence' instead.
I think you need to read up on what IQ tests are: namely, standardized measures of intelligence. The average IQ, in any generation, for any population, is 100.
Originally posted by suomichris
Amateratsu: These measures are based on IQ, and IQ tests have only been around for about 100 years. It is incorrect to extrapolate from these results back any farther in time, given that the last 100 years has seen a drastic change, far more drastic than at any period in history.
Originally posted by Amaterasu
Originally posted by suomichris
Amateratsu: These measures are based on IQ, and IQ tests have only been around for about 100 years. It is incorrect to extrapolate from these results back any farther in time, given that the last 100 years has seen a drastic change, far more drastic than at any period in history.
I don't believe I did any extrapolation into the past... I did comment on such extrapolation.
Regardless, I'll accept your statement that I am wrong. After all, links were provided to differing data, and it really is not relevant to the question of whether we here are currently linked to aliens.