reply to post by Aeons
I'd thought I was getting to understand the world, but you just opened my eyes to a huge aspect of it I'd never noticed.
Coming from Australia, where we've recently had national apologies to the aboriginal children stolen from their families and placed in orphanages or
with white families, to be murdered, raped, tortured and used as slaves,
- and to the children brought out from England who were lied to, told they were orphans, their parents told they were dead, the orphanages not even
keeping a record of where they had gone, and treated here exactly the same as the stolen aboriginal children,
- the intentional destruction of roots should have been obvious to me.
I saw a quote on why they were sent out, official, but I can't place it.
It was specified these kids were to help provide the countries with a workforce and child bearers.
And this goes along with the destruction of countries, civilisations deemed to be a future threat to us.
A celebrated Australian, MacFarlane Burnet, was working in the 1940s on ways to create epidemics to cut down the populations in Asian countries and
kill their crops before they became a threat to us. This was all government funded, and when he died a huge institute for investigating contagious
disease was named after him.
The real reason for the murder of Dr. Paul Kelly, (the suicided English weapons inspector,) may have been that he was about to admit his involvement
in an effort to create a "black bomb", a disease targeting black people.
There is a reason for not many heterosexual whites catching AIDs. There are actually 2 contagious diseases called AIDs. The first was developed in
Africa, more by trial and error, reinfecting blacks over and over until they found a disease that thrived better in blacks than in whites.
Then the rotovirus from this AIDs was isolated and worked with in a laboratory, being bred in rectal tissue, to make it specially target those using
Of course this doesn't mean straight whites should not take precautions, it still can be caught by anyone.
There has been so much evil done in the world; so many great countries/cultures intentionally savaged by economic means, and then humiliated by
brainwashed fools who can't see how the wealthy western whitestyle ......... oops, I mean lifestyle, has involved such cruelty and persecution of
And then there was the NSSM 200, a program signed by President Ford, and enforced with the help of the UN, designed to keep Western culture supreme
and keep the "lesser" countries subservient.
So are there 2 sides to this coin?
- The Western countries to be kept wealthy and dominant and the rest, to be subjugated to strict population control and used for their resources?
Or are we all ultimately in the one boat, just slaveholds to be used and abused as the puppeteers see fit?