Major Stefan Frederick Cook v [et. al] (RE: Obama eligibility - Dr. Taitz), page 2
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 55 times


reply posted on 11-7-2009 @ 12:48 AM by MagicaRose
reply to post by rgseymour



Well, just wait a day or two . He's constantly changing everything he can about this country. The man does'nt even take off on Sunday.

He's on Television almost every single day giving his speeches. He loves the camera's.

Actually its sort of hilarious to wait and see what his next big surprise will be.
edit to add:
I hope so much that this lawsuit is true and can't wait to see what happens with it.

[edit on 11-7-2009 by MagicaRose]


reply posted on 11-7-2009 @ 12:50 AM by JulieMills
reply to post by drwizardphd


It is called "EXHIBIT B" exhibit B baby!!
it is over!
goodnight sweet nurse!!!
Oby is going down!!!



reply posted on 11-7-2009 @ 01:22 AM by rgseymour
reply to post by MagicaRose



You are correct about the continuous shifting and changes, not home much for always delivering a speech somewhere in Europe. This week he has been in Russia apologizing for the atrocities of Stalin and Lenin, America had a hand in it!

I will stop with the sarcasm before I get started!

Ciao!

rgs



reply posted on 11-7-2009 @ 02:05 AM by JulieMills
reply to post by drock905



I think his lawyer discovered them. I'm sure information like that for a president is public record


reply posted on 11-7-2009 @ 02:32 AM by open_eyeballs
reply to post by expat2368



Hell no, it is not within his rights. His orders come from his commanding officers. It would be the rights of the generals and the admirals or the secretary of defense and the individual secretarys of the navy, army, air forceas as to whether or not they will take orders.

I could just see it now. Some private saying "I dont have to scrub the toilet. Not until the President shows me his birth certificate..." jesus, what the heck, is going on!?

this has to be a joke right?

[edit on 11-7-2009 by open_eyeballs]


reply posted on 11-7-2009 @ 02:32 AM by mmiichael
OK. I'm only able to speculate with incomplete information and no access to prime sources. But a leg up with info from someone who has tracked this story professionally.

There is some issue with Obama's actual birth place, his citizenship, his technical legitimacy as President. There was a story of a private investigator who tracked down the Obama-Dunham divorce papers and allegedly it gave BO's place of birth as Kenya. Either a hoax or the story was squashed.

The avoidance of supplying the full paperwork is probably a flashing red light. That said, it was decided that he should be the Pres based on his overwhelming popularity and the wish not to compromise US credibility when the economic future and negative perception were becoming a worldwide concern in the final quarter of 2008.

So he's sworn in and in the Oval Office now. If not legitimately, only a dozen people know that and they would have more to lose than gain by going public with the knowledge.

The Supreme Court will not entertain any claims trying to remove him.
Just as they took a pass on the recount demand for Florida in 2000.

But it's 2009 and there are things happening in the background that we only can surmise.

Who benefits from Obama losing his job? Is it conceivable this was a setup?
Was he parachuted in as part of a program to destabilize the US.

Is everything above unfounded rumours and paranoid suspicion?

Someone who has a pretty good idea says: Yes to some, but not all.


Mike


reply posted on 11-7-2009 @ 02:48 AM by JulieMills
reply to post by epete22



I believe that this is the first time someone actually bothered to look up his social security numbers.
That fact makes this case special. mho



reply posted on 11-7-2009 @ 02:59 AM by Lumpyloaf
reply to post by open_eyeballs



It seems as if the Major is a National Guard or Reserve soldier (almost sounds like an IRR soldier about to go through reclass prior to deployment). This means that he has standing orders (from Col. Wanda Good - that's who gave me mine as well) to activate and return to active duty for deployment. Most likely, he has filed his restraining order before effectively reporting to his "future" chain-of-command.

Do you think that a soldier is void of all basic rights when they join the military? Really? I admit, it is EXTREMELY difficult if not impossible to seek this type of legal issue within the military. However, the Major has taken it to the civil courts (where he his voice wont be squashed). You need to remember, the employees of military courts get paid by the government. They wouldn't take the heat from this kind of legal issue.

The military today isn't the same as it was in WWII. There is ALMOST too much free thought and flow of opinions from even the lowest ranks. Not only that, even though Major isn't too high on the totem pole, he is a decorated and honorable soldier who has proved his loyalty and patriotism in the past. I would seriously consider sacrificing all of my medals and awards to the Major in support of his cause, if his character was accurately portrayed in his legal introduction.

I think what he is doing is an extremely responsible and honorable thing to be quite honest. More people should stand up for what they believe. I follow orders because I TRUST my leaders to be competent and looking out for my (and my troops) best interest. Individuals blindly following orders without question leads to situations where soldiers are trying to explain why they just killed an innocent family, "cause I was ordered to".

I hope the Major is able to get clarification with this venture.


reply posted on 11-7-2009 @ 03:02 AM by earlywatcher
you can get all the details from dr orly taitz's website.
Dr. Orly Taitz Esquire
all the dossiers and filings, including the details discovered by the professional investigator hired to check into the multiple residences and social security numbers. i've been concerned about this eligibility issue for about a year now, about the conflicting stories about where he was born, no record at the hospital, no baby pictures. all that. but this multiple social security numbers is really scary, like in a different league. the attorney (orly taitz) did not make this up. this was uncovered in investigations, but could other people have used his name without his knowledge? i don't know. i know that the supreme court and other courts have been strangely reluctant to hear this case, especially back when it might have made a difference. lots of information has been suppressed.

i'm a great fan of the conspiracy theories. no problem. but it seems that there many deep and powerful secrets operating at the heart of our world. i don't know why or how they got to be so powerful. who is really behind obama? who has protected him from scrutiny?


reply posted on 11-7-2009 @ 03:09 AM by JulieMills
reply to post by earlywatcher


If we had a real press THEY could have dug up this stuff as well as the PI did.


reply posted on 11-7-2009 @ 03:20 AM by nenothtu
Originally posted by open_eyeballs
reply to
post by expat2368



Hell no, it is not within his rights. His orders come from his commanding officers. It would be the rights of the generals and the admirals or the secretary of defense and the individual secretarys of the navy, army, air forceas as to whether or not they will take orders.

I could just see it now. Some private saying "I dont have to scrub the toilet. Not until the President shows me his birth certificate..." jesus, what the heck, is going on!?

this has to be a joke right?

[edit on 11-7-2009 by open_eyeballs]


It IS within his rights, An illegal order is not legitimized by passing through a legitimate portion of the chain of command. It remains illegal. Otherwise many of the Nuremburg war criminals would have had a sufficient defense of "I was just following orders". The UCMJ requires disobedience of illegal orders for that very reason.
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>    ^^TOP^^



DEA is Investigating Montana State Legislators Over State Laws
  Posted 11 days ago with 59 member flags
The CIA in Australia: America\'s Foreign Watergate
  Posted 1 days ago with 17 member flags
Who is really behind the birthers and what is their real motive?
  Posted 10 days ago with 11 member flags
ESF and Black op funding.
  Posted 9 days ago with 11 member flags
There is NO Media Bias in America
  Posted 9 days ago with 10 member flags