reply to post by expat2368
If the plaintiff can prove below:
The evidence contained in exhibit B shows that Barrak Hussein Obama might have used as many as 149 addresses and 39 Social Security Numbers prior to
assuming office as president. The Social Security number most commonly used by Barrak Hussein Obama is one issued by the state of Connecticut, the
state where Barrak Hussein Obama never resided and shows him to be 119 years old.
......then he has a case on his hands. Note the "might have" addition to the article. I have heard plenty of might have, could have, speculated to
on this website, all the other birth certificate lawsuits have been in the same nature and they have all be thrown out to the garbage. This is a
serious accusation this individual makes, likewise its his right to put his concerns forward if he can prove it.
All the other arguments cited regarding his ineligibility have been debunked. Its funny this individual continues to cite the short form birth
certificate on the internet as a fake when the only individuals who have proclaimed it as a fake tend to be birthers and general Obama
conspirators/opponents. The accusations have not held up to experts and WND themselves admitted it last year before they flip flopped again.
The corruption is so ingrained into our politics that I don't even know if a revolution could get rid of it all. It's a real mess. Talk about a
political collapse this case could do it.
Already getting the excuses ready I see.
By the way I took the liberty of breaking down the some of the charges made towards Obama (as the others are really broken records by now, search this
forums for them). Apart from the "social sercurity numbers" allegations that are yet to be brought up this guy really didnt do his homework.... by
the least if you are going to make such accusations make sure you do your homework. It should be noted that Orly Taitz
is doing this lawsuit
again, as she was involved in past birth certificate accusations.
Exhibit C, the expert affidavit of renowned forensic document examiner Sandra Ramsey Lines, states that the certification of live birth posted by
Mr. Obama as verification of his legitimacy cannot be verified as genuine and should be presumed fraudulent.
Sandra Ramsey can get in the back of the line. The short form birth certificate has been authenticated by The Hawaiian health department, politifact,
and the Hawaiin state government. WND even brought in experts to review his birth certificate and concluded it to be authentic (despite their
continued speculation nevertheless). Sandra Ramsey at the end of the day is a private citizen, and Im pritty sure she has her own personal opinions on
Hawaiian statute 338 allows foreign born children of Hawaiian residents to obtain Hawaiian birth certificates, that those birth certificates can
be obtained based on a statement of one relative only without any corroborating evidence from the hospital; that 'late birth certificates'
the law refered here did not exist till 1982
so in turn it doesnt apply to Obama as he was born over 20years prior to that. In
addition According to UCLA Law Professor Eugene Volokh, in the hypothetical scenario that Obama was born outside the U.S., he would not be a
natural-born citizen since the then-applicable law would have required Obama's mother to have been in the U.S. at least "five years after the age of
14", but Ann Dunham was three months shy of her 19th birthday when Obama was born.
"Barack Hussein Obama’s original birth certificate was never provided by the state of Hawaii, but only a statement that there is an original
'long birth certificate' document on file.
although the birth certificate was released by the Obama campaign the hospital confirmed it as authentic and one of theirs:
In addition heres Obamas other documents that may be of interest:
1992 marriage licence
drivers licence that everybody seems to go on about when discussing his birth certificate:
[edit on 11-7-2009 by Southern Guardian]