It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

A Flying Saucer during a Spaghetti Western directed by Sergio Corbucci

page: 1
6
<<   2  3 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jul, 10 2009 @ 03:45 PM
link   
Hi, the filming of UFO in the movies seems to be a constant, I have made a
new survey on a movie that is much discussed in Italy and its name is "Compañeros "by Sergio Corbucci, where during the realization of the movie
The crew noticed the presence of a flying saucer and resumed it
with the video camera, as is clear from the interview issued
by actor Cristian De Sica, son of the winner of more Oscar awards Vittorio De Sica, to the TV program broadcasted to Rai Tre channel that is "Che tempo che fa" the
movie was sent to NASA and was also viewed by the same
actor but now there is no track of it. The link of the interview is the follow:



The interview is in italian but from gestures of the actor you can desume something.

As from the interview, it could be possible that the Saucer could still fly in the area of movie shooting so then I proceeded to watch the movie in search of some object
unidentified, and I think I have found one in the final scenes of
films as can be seen from the video and images that I report over
follows.
The video link is:



These are the images:










The images "1", "2", "3" and "4" represent the analysis of
unidentified object therefore by the images "2" and "3" we can notice that this object is not stationary in fact I took as a starting refernce point a part of the ground and it can be seen that the object stays before
this reference point as we can npotice in the image "2" and it stays after the
same reference point as we can note in the image "3" so the object has a
own motion.

What makes me associate this flying object with a UFO is his failure
association for its relative shape with something of identifiable.

Written by Mario Maisto

what do you think about?

Thanks

[edit on 10-7-2009 by Mario Maisto]




posted on Jul, 10 2009 @ 03:49 PM
link   
why couldn't it be an airplane?



posted on Jul, 10 2009 @ 03:53 PM
link   
I think someone has too much free time. How did someone ever find that video ? Still lots to see on the net. Pretty cool , makes a guy want to start watching all those old movies again to see what we missed.
Nice find !

s&f



posted on Jul, 10 2009 @ 03:56 PM
link   
reply to post by JulieMills
 


because the crew could hear the roar and they could repeat the shooting therefore it is difficult to see an airplane completely black and this object not represents clear wings.



posted on Jul, 10 2009 @ 03:59 PM
link   
reply to post by Grayelf2009
 


.....thanks so much for the compliments!



posted on Jul, 10 2009 @ 11:04 PM
link   
reply to post by JulieMills
 


yep, looks like a plan here too...



posted on Jul, 11 2009 @ 07:47 AM
link   
I was going to initially say bug, or something nearer to the camera... but watching the video it's apparent it's behind the cowboy.
But all that really means is it's something in the distance that is moving slowly relative to the horse and the camera panning.
It could still be, for instance, a far off plane that wasn't noticed during filming. It doesn't necessarily have to be noticed during filming, or the audio editors could have cut the sound out of that particular clip, and replaced it.


Since it's not a super quality video (not that is isn't good quality, but there's still plenty of blur from motion) it's difficult to say what it is and isn't.

It is, however, unidentified.



posted on Jul, 11 2009 @ 02:33 PM
link   
I hope to get the other sighitng film realized on the set of this movie that was sent to the NASA.......I want to add that the director of the movie after filming the flying saucer at one time has stopped the filming and he continued to the realization of the movie scenes and as it was noted by him and his crew the flying saucer stays for much time in that zone......one time this sighting film was broadcasted in a TV program but we don't success to find now the relative record.....the director doesn't make a spot campaign about this great event and was not even much interested in the UFO phenomenology so it could demostrate that there is no intention to realize a fake video.......the NASA was much interested to this video because it was realized with a 35 mm high-definition camera.

[edit on 11-7-2009 by Mario Maisto]



posted on Jul, 11 2009 @ 02:38 PM
link   

Originally posted by JulieMills
why couldn't it be an airplane?

...or even a bird.
There is too much motion blur to deduce what it is, but it seems pretty likely that a plane or a bird could have been in the sky.

There is a lot of motion blur...just look at the ground behind the cowboy.



[edit on 7/11/2009 by Soylent Green Is People]



posted on Jul, 11 2009 @ 02:44 PM
link   

Originally posted by Mario Maisto
 


because the crew could hear the roar and they could repeat the shooting therefore it is difficult to see an airplane completely black and this object not represents clear wings.

A plane could have been too far off to have been heard (the sound may have arrived later), or there could have been so much noise on set that the sound was not noticed.

As for the wings, if it was a plane it could have been too far off to discern its shape -- and/or the edges wings could be simply facing the camera "edge-on".

However, as I said in another post above, the object is elongated due to motion blur, so it could be a plane or it could be a bird.

[edit on 7/11/2009 by Soylent Green Is People]



posted on Jul, 11 2009 @ 02:57 PM
link   
reply to post by Soylent Green Is People
 


i don't think it is an airplane because the object is black........and i don't think that there are black airplaines.......it is right that there is motion blur but the UFO thesis is supported to the fact that there is another filming of the saucer and one of this copy of this filming is in the hands of the NASA....one time some italian ufologists asked the NASA to have the copy but it was declared "Top Secret"......



posted on Jul, 11 2009 @ 03:07 PM
link   
reply to post by Mario Maisto
 



Maybe a bird? The object seems to be moving up and down. I've seen birds doing this many times whilst soaring using thermals.

Here's some info on how it works.
www.aerospaceweb.org...

I know the response will be but the object in the clip is not moving in a circular path. I think with the small amount of time you actually see the object its quite possible it is indeed flying in a circular path, this would also explain why you cant see any wings flapping.

(edit for continuity)

[edit on 11/7/09 by refuse_orders]



posted on Jul, 11 2009 @ 03:28 PM
link   
reply to post by refuse_orders
 

it is really a good explanation but it is improbable tha there is a moevment in a circular path for some reasons:

- the filming that i put on YouTube is a very slow motion video so how the object can do circular path in such short time?

- if the object does a circular path it could come more near to the video camera and it could be much clear.....and this doesn't happen.



posted on Jul, 11 2009 @ 03:36 PM
link   
reply to post by Mario Maisto
 

Soaring birds do not have to fly in circles to glide or soar. They can glide in straight paths without flapping their wings. If they want to gain altitude they will circle in a thermal. Thermals can be very wide, hundreds of feet wide. The birds do not have to fly in small circles to stay in a wide thermal.

If they want to go somewhere the will glide in a straight path.


[edit on 7/11/2009 by Phage]



posted on Jul, 11 2009 @ 03:38 PM
link   
reply to post by Mario Maisto
 


Just because the object is not moving fast does not mean its not a bird. Sometimes it takes a while for them to find the thermal up draft whilst still using the wind blowing horizontally to stay in flight.

This could also explain the rising and falling motion of the object when observed sped up or slowed down.

[edit on 11/7/09 by refuse_orders]



posted on Jul, 11 2009 @ 03:38 PM
link   
The color doesn't necessarily preclude a plane. First, from the video it's actually just a little darker than the sky.
Second, it seems from the shadows in the film that the sun would be casting shadows on the object, making it appear a bit darker. The sun might be slightly on the side, or nearly in front of the object (relatively speaking).

However, since it's just a little darker it may just be a gray plane.



posted on Jul, 11 2009 @ 03:43 PM
link   

Originally posted by Mario Maisto

The interview is in italian but from gestures of the actor you can desume something.

[edit on 10-7-2009 by Mario Maisto]


and if it can be helpful in the interview video it is more named the italian words "Disco Volante" (in singular) or "Dischi Volanti" (in plural) that mean in english "Flying Saucer" (in singular) and "Flying Saucers" (in plural).



posted on Jul, 11 2009 @ 03:57 PM
link   
I'm putting the object down to a sub-editor or continuity error. No reason to suppose it's anything more than a plane flying by. Much like the goofs when we see a character wearing a digital watch in a period-piece...

The merest mention of the words 'spaghetti western' dictates a video link to Good, Bad and the Ugly...



Turn up the volume and click on 'full screen.'



posted on Jul, 11 2009 @ 04:04 PM
link   

Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by Mario Maisto
 

Soaring birds do not have to fly in circles to glide or soar. They can glide in straight paths without flapping their wings. If they want to gain altitude they will circle in a thermal. Thermals can be very wide, hundreds of feet wide. The birds do not have to fly in small circles to stay in a wide thermal.

If they want to go somewhere the will glide in a straight path.


[edit on 7/11/2009 by Phage]


i want to give you many stars but it is possible only one....so you wrote something of very interesting and right in fact:

- " If they want to gain altitude they will circle in a thermal" i want to underline "gain altitude" in fact in the film there is no gain of altitude made by the object but there is a litte change of altitude

- "The birds do not have to fly in small circles to stay in a wide thermal"

so the object if was a bird, it could glide in a straight path but I want to underline that depite there is a motion blur the object presents a rectangular shape and it doesn't have a central body more great respect to the anterior and posterior body.



posted on Jul, 11 2009 @ 04:09 PM
link   
Okay Bird Airplane Bug etc etc...

First thing I need is the translation of the first video, because from what I understand the actor is talking about having noticed the UFO and turned the Camera on it?

That would be the first step before saying its just a bug, glitch or other pet debunk.



new topics

top topics



 
6
<<   2  3 >>

log in

join