Sounds to me like they gave her the vaccine. That's what probably killed her!

Yes. I remember the first death in New York.... the MSM stated he had underlying health conditions...... his family was interviewed stating they did not know what those reports were talking about.

This womans death of H1N1 will state that she had underlying health problems when it is reported on. It will be the arthritis.

According to what I've read in the threads here at ATS.... "underlying health problems" could mean someone is a smoker, overweight, diabetic, etc. Who alive does not have what could be construed as "underlying health conditions"? Heck, even Michael Phelps smoked once! (i.e. the bong pic)

In other words.... the MSM is not ready to admit these people would be alive today had they not gotten H1N1 Flu.

Ahh.... stupid me....... I see this is being portrayed now in the MSM as some of the "first healthy" to die of H1N1 regardless of having the same conditions as those who have already died. They are not referring to "underlying health conditions" even though they could.

And last nights network news (USA) actually covered H1N1 for the first time in months.

I guess it is the new spin on the news to con us all in to succumbing easily to the untested vaccine?

This is the unsettling trend we're all witnessing around the world. The initial illnesses- March and April were, for the most part, limited to those with other health issues, and those who died, did so over weeks spent in hospital, with all measures taken to treat either the flu or the subsequent pneumonia.

What I've seen in June and July- and have posted about (ad nauseum- forgive me-) is that there has been a big shift in the time between catching flu and dying of it- prior illness or not. As I posted on another thread, some children who are in the bloom of health have taken ill and died within 24 hours- here in the US, in Canada, and elsewhere.

The shift in morbitity and mortality that we're seeing is a hallmark of a novel flu pandemic- and it mirrors exactly what happened in 1918-19.

As I've mentioned, John Barry's, "The Great Influenza' is an exceptional resource, and in it there are data, that when overlaid with the current figures, are essentially identical.

This is the main reason we need to go to "general quarters" regarding this flu. My mom remembers stories her mom told her of the '18 pandemic- that one would feel perfectly well in the morning, fall ill in the daytime, and be dead within 24-48 hours.

The 1918 flu had a mortality rate of about 2.5% of those infected- and killed between 50 and 100 million people, worldwide. It stopped WWI- no one was well enough to fight. And, as WWI took more lives than any other war in the 20th C, combined, remember that more soldiers died of flu than of combat injuries.

I don't suggest panic, by any means, but it's time people "got with the program" and started taking this seriously- because it IS serious.