Originally posted by TSer78
Two men kissing in a public restaurant is just in poor taste. This just isn't the type of place to do it, especially where children may come into
view of something like this.
I'm not convinced that all they did was kiss on the lips briefly that caused this uproar.
Sounds too much like someone wanting to sue the hell out of anyone by claiming they're civil rights were violated, because they're broke, and found
the right place to make a scene.
As far as establishments refusing service, and requesting individuals to leave the premises, usually is to protect the other patrons of the
establishment. It is their right to refuse obscene or lewd behavior.
"My god, please somebody think of the children!" I'm definitely not tired of hearing this old worn out arguement that has been taken to far as it
was.

So is a man and woman kissing in a public place in poor taste? I imagine you will say yes just to justify your ignorant post, but in
reality, you wouldn't even think twice of it. I think the real problem is, is that you not only have to explain to your kids of why two men are
kissing but you also are trying some pathetic attempt to prevent your kids from "choosing" to be gay. It's a simple explanation and kids aren't
that fragile. I was explained of homosexuality when I was that young because my mom worked and befriended a gay guy who lived with a partner and we
were going to hang out with them. I was cool with it and it didn't bother me.
Did it turn me gay? No, because contrary to popular belief, it is not a choice, but something you are born with. People who choose to be gay or
straight are the ones going against nature. Another ignorant comment is the who conspiracy to sue the establishment. If it involves gays, then it must
be just another way to push their agenda on the poor ol' public, nevermind that they were expressing themselves to each other. It is true that places
have the right to pick and choose their customers, but that's also not very good for business. Then again, it was perfectly acceptable to kick out
blacks from a place because it was the businesses right to do so. That worked out well for them, didn't it?