It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by oneclickaway
reply to post by nau310d
Yes, I know it’s terrible about paedophilia. 20 years you say? In that case something needs done about the huge percentage of heterosexuals (with ‘evil and demonic behaviours’) that commit crimes against children. As it is mainly a heterosexual problem, what do you suggest?
I know I am repeating myself ad nauseam, but as people don’t read…here goes… Anal sex is practiced by a large percentage of heterosexuals…so with your argument are you really saying that heterosexuality is unnatural, abnormal, dirty and degenerate?
Yes, indeed….very little thinking….
Originally posted by Gorman91
reply to post by JaxonRoberts
My big problem is this with such laws. There was a case where a gay couple couldn't use a dating service and the fed forced them to. That's forcing people to change their business (by writing code), to appease to the fed's views.
That's my problem. The whole forcing to thing.
A business has a right to do what it wants in terms of conduct. I think racism should be the line, because that's someone's being hood. But being gay is no different then being straight, by, asexual, etc etc. And the fact remains that your sexual behavior is not to be forced upon anyone, so if a business does not want to service them, it's their right.
One of the cornerstones of western society is that there's more to life than sex and reproduction. So this should not be as important to protecting as race and gender, because those are formal parts of the species that cannot be held against someone. Sexuality is not suppose to be equal to who the individual is. It's your private matter, not something you should be allowed to use as a shield behind or something.
This rise of sexual patriotism is utterly ridiculous and prone to civil decay. Putting sex and reproduction as the corner stone of society puts us backwards.
Sex is not suppose to be that thing that glues society together. Society is. Individuals working together to better themselves and the general public is suppose to be there.
When you put sex as something to legislate and protect and do anything with, you run into very dangerous waters.
It should be simply this. Your sexuality does not matter from the federal government. You can marry, have full rights, and go on your marry way. But the individual of a business should have a right to direct conduct in his property as he sees fit. If he does not want homosexual activity in his bar, it's his right, as it is his property and his building for which he can legislate as he wishes, so long it doesn't go against the individuals rights. Sex, being something that needs more than one people, is not individual rights. Even masturbation falls under this category as well, as a hypothetical individual is present anyway, so there's still more than one person, by proxy.
If an individual does not want masturbation, or self love, in his bar, it;s his right. If he doesn't want homosexual behavior, it's his right. If he doesn't want heterosexual behavior, it's his right. But if he doesn't want blacks, or Hispanics in his bar, that is racism and not allowed, as it violated the individuals right.
Well, that's how I view it.
If Gods exist they would definitly not acknowladge homosexuality. Why do you think aids was created? It was to mostly eliminate homosexuals and heroine addicts.