 |
|
Topic started on 7-5-2004 @ 08:36 AM by dbates
|
Immediately after the two planes flew into the World Trade
Center on September 11, 2001, six air traffic controllers of the New York area were asked by their manager to make a tape describing the entire event
from their point of view. These controllers were those that had actually spoken with the hijacked planes. The manger's expectation was that officials
who were investigating the incident could later use this tape, but no one else ever heard what was recorded on this tape. Sometime near the end of
2001, an unidentified Federal Aviation Administration quality assurance manager destroyed the tape and cut it up into pieces. The FAA manager actions
are questionable since the FAA sent out a directive 3 days after 9/11 to retain all evidence of the incident.
boston.com
WASHINGTON -- Air traffic controllers who handled two of the hijacked flights on Sept. 11, 2001, recorded their experiences shortly after the
planes crashed into the World Trade Center but a supervisor destroyed the tape, government investigators said Thursday.
The report said the controllers who made the tape had either talked to the hijacked planes that crashed into the World Trade Center or were working
radar positions that intersected with the jetliners' flight paths.
The details of this tape's existence only came up in interviews with the flight controllers in the 9-11 Commission. FAA spokesman Greg Martin claims
that the quality manager was disciplined, and that he believes that the contents of the tape would not have added anything to the investigation.
Still, we will never know the full details of what was actually said on the tape, and since the recording was from participants in the events it
couldn't have hurt to keep the tape. Surely, a recording that happened when all the details of the event were fresh on their minds would have been
valuable information. The FAA would not comment on the name of the official that destroyed the tape.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 7-5-2004 @ 01:31 PM by dz
|
...this, doesn't seem odd to anyone else?
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 7-5-2004 @ 01:48 PM by kode
|
this whole planet seems a bit odd to me
but yes definatly odd, the rest of the media seems to be ignoring it at the moment to. maybe some names that weren’t meant to be mentioned or broken
code of practice was revealed which someone obviously felt urged to cover up
[Edited on 7-5-2004 by kode]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 7-5-2004 @ 01:49 PM by Bangin
|
Of course this seems odd, dz, but people would rather not comment on such a topic without irrefutable proof to back up their theory. I'm sure you
can understand. If not just check 9/11 related threads on ATS and you'll notice a trend.
I don't buy the official 9/11 story and it's doubtful I ever will. Do I have all the answers? No. Do I want them? Absolutely.
Why won't they release the name of the 'official' that destroyed the tape? Let's beat some answers out of him/her. The testimonies of those air
traffic controllers would be extremely helpful. According to many of the 9/11 timelines that I've viewed, the FAA didn't notify NORAD promptly and
we've all wondered what caused the delay. Cut a tape into pieces? Someone's got something to hide.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 7-5-2004 @ 02:21 PM by CommonSense
|
Originally posted by Bangin
Why won't they release the name of the 'official' that destroyed the tape? Let's beat some answers out of him/her.
Cut a tape into pieces? Someone's got something to hide. 
Thsi whole thing seems really weird to me. One would think that with this much talk about, the name of the official would have been leaked by now.
That's just human nature when too many people know. I kind of has me thinking urban legend. Obviously, more than one person knows who this alleged
official is. It's time to talk.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 7-5-2004 @ 02:28 PM by mrmulder
|
It seems odd to me too but you want to know the truth? The majority of Americans don't care about all the inconsistensies about 9/11. They already
believe what Bush and his boys told them after the attacks. In most Americans minds "Bush is the greatest. Who cares about all the questions not
being asked. We're going to be safe under Bush regardless."
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 7-5-2004 @ 03:46 PM by Outland
|
Originally posted by mrmulder
"The majority of Americans don't care about all the inconsistensies about 9/11. They already believe what Bush and his boys told them after the
attacks. In most Americans minds 'Bush is the greatest'..." 
That's a whole lot of assumption wrapped in thick layer of bias. I think the truth is that most Americans are too busy trying to live a life, support
a family and pay bills to put too much time into thinking about 9-11. Others take the "we'll never know the whole truth anyway" approach.
I don't fully believe the "official" story behind 9-11 either, but I don't bite at any little bit of conspiracy rumor that pops up. I do think
it's odd about the tape and that the reasoning was unacceptable. However, those people on the tape must still be around somewhere and I'm sure their
memories work just fine. Unfortunately, the tape might prove more credible.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 7-5-2004 @ 03:49 PM by falcon
|
They may have distroyed those tapes but I have had one of them for a while and others have copys it will come out.
Falcon
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 7-5-2004 @ 04:33 PM by dbates
|
Originally posted by falcon
They may have distroyed those tapes but I have had one of them for a while and others have copys it will come out.
Falcon 
You have copies of the destroyed tape? How did you get it? Either your an airtraffic controller or.......
mg src="http://images.google.com/images?q=tbn:MSppzbUudyQJ:www.claybennett.com/images/archivetoons/polygraph.jpg"width=200>
If you really have it what was said on this tape?
[Edited on 7-5-2004 by dbates]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 7-5-2004 @ 08:10 PM by dz
|
What I meant as odd is not the fact that they won't release the tape, but the fact that it was destroyed.
Not only destroyed, but cut up into pieces?
Why would you destroy it in the first place?
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 8-5-2004 @ 12:52 AM by porschedrifter
|
If there wasnt anything important or normal on the tape, NO ONE in thier right minds would destroy the tape. Not unless there was something to cover
up.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |