I Don't Want To Shoot To Kill, page 5


Pages: <<  2    3    4    5  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 6 times


reply posted on 17-7-2009 @ 07:02 AM by nenothtu
Originally posted by fizzy1
Originally posted by Hazelnut
I don't want to take another life! I just don't want to do it...but what if I have to?



Who says you HAVE to? Jeesh we dont live in a world without choices. There are many choices available to you including stun guns, home alarm systems, panic rooms etc etc. Look it up on the internet and stop worrying about killing someone for christs sake. If you dont want to kill someone then DONT. Take steps to protect your family and yourself. I dont own a gun and i dont wander around everyday freaked out like you seem to be, about whether i am going to ever HAVE to kill someone. I made the decision a long time ago i have no issue at all in taking a life if i needed to in order to protect my children. Thats a personal decision i made and one i would have to live with. I can live with it. You do not need others on here or anywhere else telling you what THEY would do in order for you to know what YOU should do. Thats just idiotic. If you cannot make up your own mind on how best to protect your family you need more help than people on here can give. Grow up and do what you need to do for the ones you love.


In a perfect world, we could all bend the world to our wills, and those options would always be available.

This is not a perfect world, and they are not always available.

One other note: I do security, consultations and protective services for a living these days. The "home alarm systems" you mention are the biggest joke in the industry, and are nothing more than 'money for nothing' for the folks that run those "services".

Stun guns are nice, as long as you are able to use them (enough bulk or speed against a lightly armed opponent). If the attacker has a gun themselves, or is able to grasp or grapple you, your toast. No nice way to put it.

In 14 years of doing this sort of work, I've yet to run into anyone with enough money for a "panic room", at least not one that would be effective, so I can't really comment on "panic rooms", other than to say that if I'm panicked, locked into a room with no maneuverability is the LAST place I'd want to be. However, that is only a personal preference, not a professional assessment.



[edit on 2009/7/17 by nenothtu]


reply posted on 18-7-2009 @ 04:53 PM by apacheman
reply to post by nenothtu



Roger that! I used to install burglar alarms, and I warned my clients that they only kept out the amateurs, any decent pro can disable the best home system in about thirty seconds.

Personally, I prefer to make the other guy panic. So much easier that way to take the non-lethal path. Unfortunately, nonlethal means you gotta do something]/i] with the prisoner. In a SHTF situation, holding prisoners is very likely to get you killed. If they're dangerous enough to to have to disable them, you CAN'T trust them for a second. So you wind up holding slaves, if you make them earn their keep, or freeloaders if you don't.

I'd rather deal with the issue cleanly and shoot them dead from the beginning: anyone worth incorporating into the group won't try to join by attacking it.


reply posted on 19-7-2009 @ 11:38 PM by nenothtu
reply to post by mrsdudara



I wouldn't fret overmuch about sacrificing my soul and spending eternity in hell.

From My perspective on christianity, it would be immoral to allow innocents to suffer at the hands of the depraved, and more so when it's your own family, that you are charged to protect. The good book says that an individual who fails to take care of their family is worse than an unbeliever. That pretty much says it all for me.

Likewise, if one has to shoot invaders, particularly in a situation where medical help is likely to be unavailable, it would be immoral to shoot to just hurt, thus causing them untold suffering. It doesn't hurt the case that a dead man has a much more difficult time shooting back than one that's hurt and ticked off about it.


reply posted on 20-7-2009 @ 12:16 AM by dooper
reply to post by nenothtu



I recall Abraham going on the warpath.

And David, "a man after God's own heart" was a warrior.

And don't forget Joshua.

God being the same today, as yesterday, and tomorrow, you can get a real good idea of how God feels about fighting if you just open both books, New and Old, and find out for yourself.

He don't care much for fence-straddlers either. "Because you were neither hot nor cold, but lukewarm, I will spew you out of my mouth."

Seems He can forgive someone who does something wrong, but doesn't have a lot of patience with those who do nothing.

Ours is a God of action.

Pages: <<  2    3    4    5  >>    ^^TOP^^



The Oldest and Most Incredible Weapons System...Ever. The ATLATL.
  Posted 4 days ago with 58 member flags
Unemployed? Hate Your Crummy Job? Start Producing!
  Posted 4 days ago with 35 member flags
*Every U.S Army Field Manual in one location*
  Posted 9 days ago with 22 member flags
How To Survive Being Homeless In America
  Posted 7 days ago with 17 member flags
I was attacked last night, and didn\'t know what to do!
  Posted 11 days ago with 16 member flags
Prepping the right way for true survival
  Posted 8 days ago with 15 member flags
Meat in the Wilderness - What\'s that smell?
  Posted 12 days ago with 13 member flags