Also worth noting that I'm seeing magnetospheric flaring on the RTMS and increasing pressure behind the magnetopause, so it looks like North America is about to take some energy - so everyone watching seismos keep an eye out, I'll post any changes of note..

Maybe today we can document a correlation..

thats just an hours drive away from me... maybe i should go down there and take some pictures.

Yeah thanks again questioningall. I don't think I'd have learned as much as I have if it weren't for the insight provided by some of your threads and posts. (S&F's and a drink all around!)

Originally posted by Darkice19
I watched the video of the earth growing theory. When the earth was smaller and all the contenants were together where was all the water?

icy meteorite brought it or natural process of heat/plants/moisture/clouds over millions/billions of years?

This is not my area, but I have some thoughts. Possible upwelling due to seismic activity, movement of water or methane. I would be interested as to any seismic activity in the area.

"...a coast-line of mingled mud, ooze, and weedy Cyclopean masonry which can be nothing less the tangible substance of earth's supreme terror — the nightmare corpse-city of R'lyeh." - "Call of Cthulhu", H.P Lovecraft

Sorry couldnt resist.

But seriously, I always find these strange geological happenings interesting, if for no more reason then they often constitute that much more evidence towards the reality of catastrophism.

Maybe it has something to do with the earthquake in the northpole

Magnitude 6.1
Date-Time

* Tuesday, July 07, 2009 at 19:11:45 UTC
* Tuesday, July 07, 2009 at 02:11:45 PM at epicenter
* Time of Earthquake in other Time Zones

Location 75.325°N, 72.312°W
Depth 10 km (6.2 miles) set by location program
Region BAFFIN BAY
Distances 170 km (105 miles) SW of Qaanaaq (Thule), Greenland
315 km (195 miles) ESE of Grise Fiord, Nunavut, Canada
1455 km (910 miles) NNW of NUUK (GODTHAB), Greenland
3330 km (2070 miles) N of Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Location Uncertainty horizontal +/- 3.8 km (2.4 miles); depth fixed by location program
Parameters NST=216, Nph=216, Dmin=>999 km, Rmss=0.98 sec, Gp= 58°,
M-type=centroid moment magnitude (Mw), Version=T
Source

* USGS NEIC (WDCS-D)

Event ID us2009iubh



maybe as it was underwater may have had an effect ..

I think all earthquakes are related, no?

I think its pretty obvious that the earth is experiencing some sort of "structure" shift. I have a theory that over time the core or near core area expends a seizable amount of material. Due to the spinning forces this body makes its way to the earths surface to cause havoc on any life forms unlucky to be in existence at the time.

The reason I came to this conclusion was an article that was in The Boston Herald in the 1980s. A small section just inside the front page was dedicated to paragraph long science stories. One was that several countries triangulated an underground nuclear test by a 4th country. The triangulation of location also resulted in the discovery of a smaller core off the side of the earths main core. If anyone has access to older data of the Boston Herald this might be worth exploring!

The Webb bot, right on the money once again, thanks for the information. And to you all, "Prepare for the future"

Originally posted by TheWatcher11
The Webb bot, right on the money once again, thanks for the information. And to you all, "Prepare for the future"

What did the webbot predict and when?

I think it was actually just Chuck Norris doing a push-up on the other side of the earth.