First Lady requires more than twenty attendants, page 3
Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 7 times


reply posted on 9-7-2009 @ 04:14 PM by ElectricUniverse
reply to post by Jadette




Really? is that why President Obama's inauguration was the most expensive ever made for ANY president DURING a time of FINANTIAL CRISIS?......

Oh sure, we are in a recession, and going towards a really bad Deppression but hey, let's allow the first lady to continue hiring more than 20 attendants being paid by the tax-payer meanwhile many American families can't afford to buy 3 meals a day for their families, and of course, hundreds of thousands of Americans keep losing their jobs each month.....




[edit on 9-7-2009 by ElectricUniverse]


reply posted on 9-7-2009 @ 04:23 PM by ElectricUniverse
reply to post by SR



Most leftists don't believe people like you, and I who have experienced Socialism/Communism, and they rather believe a liar like Moore.

A couple of years back I was pointing out the fact that Moore was lying about "the so wonderful healthcare in Cuba" yet many members were claiming they would accept lies like that to get to the truth of the American healthcare...

I never knew you get to the truth with lies but anyway, meanwhile the Obamatrons keep cheering for "CHANGE" the country is indeed being changed into a Socialist dictatorship, and the Obamatrons still keep cheering....

Of course, business goes as usual, and the Obama administration spends more money than ever as if we were not having an economic crisis...and as the Obama administration have been saying... "Let's not let pass a GOOD economic CRISIS, since now they can do things that would be impossible to do in the past. That is to transform the Republic into a Socialist dictatorship.


[edit on 9-7-2009 by ElectricUniverse]


reply posted on 9-7-2009 @ 06:33 PM by Styki
reply to post by jd140



Exactly, all I am saying is that she has things that need to be done and if she cuts back on assistants everything might not get done. I personally don't know what all she needs done but does anyone else here know exactly what she needs done? Without that knowledge we can't really say she has to many assistants.

Cutting back is a good thing, there are just some things where cutting back is not the best idea. In my opinion this article is just attempting to take some cheap shots at the Obama family.



reply posted on 31-8-2009 @ 12:03 PM by nixie_nox
reply to post by jd140



The first assisant to Michelle has 3 blackberriers just to keep up with Michelles appointments alone.

I am pretty sure she is busy.


this thread really has to be one of the more immature threads. I thought school was back in.


reply posted on 31-8-2009 @ 12:37 PM by oneclickaway
reply to post by Styki



Exactly, all I am saying is that she has things that need to be done and if she cuts back on assistants everything might not get done. I personally don't know what all she needs done but does anyone else here know exactly what she needs done? Without that knowledge we can't really say she has to many assistants.


Now that ain't exactly logical now is it? If we have no idea what she 'needs to get done' FOR THE COUNTRY in an OFFICIAL role...then without that knowledge we really cannot say she even needs ONE assistant. As other first ladies appear not to have had more than two or three....I find it completely and utterly excessive.


reply posted on 31-8-2009 @ 12:42 PM by oneclickaway
reply to post by TheOneElectric




Attack the policies and not the individuals, for there is no gain in making petty and pathetic attacks. Understand that the women has two children, her mother, and a pet to look after.


Wow...two children...and a mother who was allowed to live in the White house to help look after those kids....and a pet. How does she do it? And there I was thinking that other mums, often single parents have to work all day and still cope...silly me.
NOBODY on this earth needs 22 assistants.
Didn't she talk about everyone having to share the pie...and some would have to have less of the pie so that others would have more?
Well, there ya go.



reply posted on 31-8-2009 @ 12:56 PM by A Fortiori
reply to post by solarstorm



I just want to restate what others have said because I will be the last post...

Laura Bush had a staff of 24, Hillary had 15 plus interns...it is how the game is played. Maybe they are not elected officials, but they are used as diplomatic tools just as women have been used for centuries. They have to take up public causes, they have appearances every day, etc.

"Attendant" is somewhat inflammatory and unnecessary, IMO.


reply posted on 31-8-2009 @ 01:04 PM by Miraj
reply to post by Jadette



What I want to know is.. Why isn't the main stream media in an outrage over this womens 20 attendants paid for by the tax payers, as they were by Sarah Palin's nice clothes paid for by her campaign?

The explanation: She's married to a democratic president. As long as the democrats do it, it's ok! But if a republican does it? Oh no, their wasting money?


reply posted on 1-9-2009 @ 06:38 AM by Uniceft17
reply to post by Bombeni



Bush got elected for a 2nd term, So there is definately a possibility.

not a one liner.
Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>    ^^TOP^^



Fox News Drops The Ball On Its Focus Group - Ron Paul Supporters!
  Posted 12 days ago with 43 member flags
Obama Supporters...Remember This List When You Vote This Year.
  Posted 11 days ago with 35 member flags
26 Things Non-Paul Voters Are Basically Saying
  Posted 3 days ago with 27 member flags
What\'s With The Obama Love on ATS Today?
  Posted 14 days ago with 25 member flags
Obama and why he\'ll still be president...
  Posted 16 days ago with 24 member flags

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:

Hollow Earth Theory New Evidence.
  General Conspiracies, Posted 17 hours ago, 122 replies
Anonymous show your face!
  Rant, Posted 13 hours ago, 67 replies
I saw a cat turn into a bag..
  The Gray Area, Posted 17 hours ago, 44 replies
ATS's Gutter-rats and the 90+ intro thread
  Rant, Posted 17 hours ago, 36 replies