Princess Diana: The Case Reviewed

page: 6
62
<< 3  4  5    7  8 >>

log in

join

posted on Jul, 12 2009 @ 03:30 PM
link   
There seems to be a problem with the link I just posted. I hope this one works:
the English translation of
www.investigateur.info...
is
uk.babelfish.yahoo.com... n.html&lp=fr_en&btnTrUrl=Translate




posted on Jul, 12 2009 @ 03:32 PM
link   
No. Sorry, but the link does not work, it seems. You will have to translate the French material yourselves.



posted on Jul, 12 2009 @ 04:20 PM
link   
Does anybody know if Henri Paul was still alive when he was put in an ambulance? Because carbon monoxide lethality starts at a fraction of 1%, a concentration of 20%(or 12%) would have invariably been fatal. I wonder if the driver didn't get this dose via a oxygen/surgical mask slipped over his face during emergency treatment at the hospital. And maybe Dodi and Diana got the same 'oxygen mask' treatment.



posted on Jul, 12 2009 @ 04:25 PM
link   
reply to post by starviego
 


Henri Paul died at the scene:
users.rcn.com...
Many people believe his blood sample was replaced by that of an alcoholic who had recently killed himself by carbon monoxide poisoning.



posted on Jul, 12 2009 @ 04:49 PM
link   
From wikipedia:

en.wikipedia.org...
"Dodi Fayed and Henri Paul both died at the scene. Dodi Fayed had been sitting in the left rear passenger seat and appeared to be dead. Nevertheless, fire officers were still trying to resuscitate him when he was pronounced dead by a doctor at 1:30 a.m. Henri Paul was declared dead on removal from the wreckage."

It doesn't indicate when Henri Paul was pulled from the wreckage. If both Dodi and Paul were receiving medical treatment before such time, isn't it possible that would have included an oxygen mask? Like a previous poster said, if this was a hit they would have ensured that the docs would have been pre-selected to make sure the targets didn't survive.

Anyway a second round of blood tests on Henri Paul confirmed both the high concentrations of alcohol and CO.

[edit on 12-7-2009 by starviego]



posted on Jul, 12 2009 @ 05:26 PM
link   
The notion that Henri Paul was finished off with a dose of carbon monoxide is, frankly, ludicrous. It would have been detected and immediately aroused suspicion in any subsequent autopsy, as in fact happened. The high level of this gas found in his blood has never been explained in a plausible way. Attempts to dismiss it as what would be expected in a heavy smoker are laughable. It points towards the switching of his blood sample analysed in the French lab by that of someone with a high level of alcohol in his blood so as to perpetuate the myth that Henri Paul was drunk at the time. What was not known to whoever did the switch was that the other person had died by carbon monoxide poisoning.......



posted on Jul, 13 2009 @ 08:15 AM
link   
reply to post by TheMythLives
 


No, the book never said anything else about Princess Diana or Dodi Fayed.

It was approximately a half page worth of mention, and it was only cross-referencing Osama bin Laden's family.

I returned that book to the library, but bought a copy for myself.

I think I may end up doing a thread on the whole family, it's involvement with the Al Saud family and Saudi Arabia, and how they have both been in bed with the United States Government.



posted on Jul, 13 2009 @ 08:33 AM
link   
I have discovered a passage in one of the investigative archives of a French newspaper that blows the official story of Princess Diana's death sky high, changing it from a car accident to an assassination. In the dossier entitled "France" at
www.investigateur.info...
there is a detailed account of the death of James Andanson, the notorious paparazzi photographer, whom many students of Princess Diana's death suspect was the driver of the white Fiat Uno that was seen coming out of the Pont de l'Alma tunnel in Paris seconds after Dodi Fayed's car crashed. It is now known that this high society photographer spent several hours on board Dodi's yacht a few days before the crash, being invited to take photos of Diana and Dodi for newspapers and magazines. See:

He was found dead less than three years after the tragedy in 1997 in a burnt-out car in woodlands near Montpellier in France, his body so badly charred that it took the police nearly a month to establish his identity, using DNA and dental records. A fireman, Mr Pelat, who arrived on the scene of the burning car, said that he saw two bullet holes in Andanson's head
www.express.co.uk...:-Fiat-driver-%27shot-in-the-head%27
The police, however, concluded that Andanson had committed suicide when he discovered his wife was having an affair with a local farmer. His wife, as well as friends, adamantly rejected this. She said: "My husband was not more depressed two days before his death than six months or three years ago." She also said that he often bragged about being at the scene of the crash that fateful night (see the video above). Someone took this last photo of Diana alive in the car in the tunnel just before it crashed:
blog.nationmultimedia.com...
(Well, perhaps not the very last. Photos have been released of Diana still alive after the crash). The point is: did Andanson take it? He owned a white Fiat Uno, paint from which matched exactly that found on Dodi's Mercedes.He repainted the car and sold it in October, 1997, a few months after Diana's death.

What is odd about Andanson's death is that his badly charred body was found inside his locked car but no car keys were found either inside or outside it on the ground. How was that possible? What person intent on shooting himself inside his car would bother, anyway, to set fire to it first just before pulling the trigger? And how could he manage to shoot himself twice in the head?! If he was murdered because he drove the car that (intentionally or accidently) bumped into Dodi's car, causing it to swerve and crash, the assassin made the blunder of holding onto the keys after shooting Andanson and locking the car in which his burnt body was found. The absence of the car keys proves that he was shot by someone else, therefore indicating a conspiracy to silence him.

Here is the crucial passage in the English translation of the French archive on Andanson at:
www.investigateur.info...

"Selon le rapport confidentiel d¹une sorte de ³groupe d¹études², constitué, après la mort d¹Andanson, par des amis que le photographe avait su se faire dans une société anglo-saxonne d¹investigation et de sécurité proche des services britanniques, le photographe a été assassiné par un homme de main d¹origine yougoslave, T...,évoluant habituellement sous le pseudonyme d¹une grande famille de la noblesse française, connu aussi de la chanteuse Amanda Lear."
Its English translation, garbled by the Google translator, is:

"According to the confidential report ¹ d ³ a kind of group studies ² ¹, formed after the death of Andanson ¹ by friends that the photographer was able to do in an Anglo-Saxon ¹ d investigative and security services near the British photographer has been murdered by a man Peaceful Yugoslav ¹, T. .., usually operating under the pseudonym d ¹ a large family of French nobility, also known to the singer Amanda Lear."

Now, Amanda Lear is a famous French transexxual singer and TV show hostess who was a close friend of Salvador Dali.
en.wikipedia.org...
In 1979, she married the bisexual French aristocrat Alain-Philippe Malagnac d'Argens:
en.wikipedia.org...
It is suspected that this man killed himself in a fire at his home in 2000 in a suicide pact with his former close male friend, who had died shortly before. So what this explosive passage in "Le Investigateur" is saying is that a Yugoslav code-named "T", who worked under a pseudonym that is part of this aristocrat's name, murdered the very man whom many suspect was involved in the assassination of Princess Diana!

That this man "T" was connected to intelligence agencies is strongly suggested in the following passage from "L'investigateur", translated by Google:

"But information of the British from now on came from to (sic) a service French information, attached to the Ministry for Defense. They could have unexpected developments. (Old) connections of T… with Amanda Lear feed from the interrogations on death by fire - a mania - D ¹ Alain-Philippe Malagnac, the husband of the singer, on December 28, 2000. T. would have worked a little, also, a year before, on the Safra file - name of the owner of National Républic Bank of New York, asphyxiated in a fire with L ¹ interior of its building-fortress of Monaco, on December 6, 1999. According to L ¹ official investigation, fire had been lit in a dustbin by an old green beret (commando of the special forces) American, Ted Maher. It came D ¹ to be recruited as male nurse, and lived a love disappointed with one of his colleagues… "

Notice the reference to working on the "Safra file". It refers to the murder of Edmond Safra, the founder of the Republic National Bank in New York, in 1999 (two years after Diana's death), for which an ex-Green Beret, Ted Maher, was convicted.
en.wikipedia.org...
Safra employed security guards trained by the Israeli Mossad and had contacts with the FBI. So his murder was of great interest to intelligence agencies because he had made enemies with the Russian mafia. The man codennamed "T", named by the French newspaper website as Andanson's killer, was therefore very likely either an intelligence agent or a free-lance hitman who carried out "wet jobs" for intelligence agencies.

This proof that Andanson was murdered implies a conspiracy behind Diana's death.



posted on Jul, 13 2009 @ 04:38 PM
link   
reply to post by TheMythLives
 


TheMythLives I really enjoy your case reveiwed posts. Can you do one on Michael Jackson?



posted on Jul, 13 2009 @ 07:15 PM
link   

Originally posted by aero56

Originally posted by jimbo2167
TBH I've never thought anything suspicious in the death of Diana.

A very normal and simple way to die in a car crash.
Yes there were controversial theories regarding the cause of
the crash but the fact is if Diana and Dodi were wearing their
seatbelts they would have survived this accident.


How can you say it is a "fact" Dodi and Diana would have survived?



How can you know who was wearing a seat belt? These are statements made of the incident, not necessarily facts.

It's also far from normal, or simple, to crash a car and die with hardly a specific cause. I fail to recognize much of anything normal in this event? Pretty much every fact stated is suspicious, if not obvious!

You need a reality check!



posted on Jul, 14 2009 @ 02:37 PM
link   
reply to post by Crescent Moon
 


Yes, I have been recieving a lot of requests for a MJ thread. I need to wait longer before I do that one. I want all the info present so I can make a reasonable conclusion. But I do not think he was murdered. I think he just died. Anyway, I appreciate the kind words!

thank you all for the kind words and support!



posted on Jul, 22 2009 @ 01:22 AM
link   
To OP: sorry if I was mean in my first comment. I watched the video someone linked to from here, and my opinion has changed!

The royal family would kill her in order to keep her quiet about their secret family affairs, and also because she maybe, embarrassed them by divorcing Charles and getting on with her life. And for marrying an Arab.

I don't understand though, why the French government would want to kill her. Maybe they actually wanted to get rid of Dodi for some reason.

One bit of evidence could be plausible to me, about Henri Paul being on Prozac and possibly drunk. I have knowledge of psychiatric meds, and I can tell you that Prozac can make you drowsy. Also, using alcohol intensifies this side effect. Also-just because someone is not evidently an alcoholic does not mean that they could drink only once and get drunk, like he apparently did.

But also, I realized that the driver, Henri Paul must have been involved in the plot to kill her/them, because he tipped off the paparazzi/intelligence agents pretending to be paparazzi. They were probably paying him for information about Diana and Dodi's whereabouts that evening. But would French intelligence sacrifice one of their own agents to kill Diana and Dodi?

Another issue I have with the evidence people don't believe, is that I wonder if it is in any way possible for carbon monoxide to form when an airbag is deployed? Or is it possible someone tampered with the car, like plugged up the tailpipe? You can get carbon monoxide poisoning if the car exhaust is unable to escape. I don't buy the theory that paramedics gave Diana or anybody else carbon monoxide through a pretend oxygen mask! How many paramedics ever carry something like that around?

Another thing I don't understand, is why the US intelligence would be involved in the incident in any way. None of the people involved were American, and it happened in France. I suspect the French were involved, due to them being sneaky and hiding information, and also due to the fact that it happened in France.

If anybody can answer my questions, or has evidence to dispute my arguments, please respond.



posted on Jul, 22 2009 @ 10:08 AM
link   
reply to post by muffingirl
 





But would French intelligence sacrifice one of their own agents to kill Diana and Dodi?

Another issue I have with the evidence people don't believe, is that I wonder if it is in any way possible for carbon monoxide to form when an airbag is deployed? Or is it possible someone tampered with the car, like plugged up the tailpipe? You can get carbon monoxide poisoning if the car exhaust is unable to escape. I don't buy the theory that paramedics gave Diana or anybody else carbon monoxide through a pretend oxygen mask! How many paramedics ever carry something like that around?


Yes French intelligence would sacrifice their own. But that was Fayeds man, so their is not a lot of evidence linking Paul to France, but evidence linking aul to the British Intelligence.

I suppose air bag could deploy carbon monoxide. Not sure how it would be done though, but it is very possible. And plugging it up is always possible that would have been a spot that I am sure no one would have checked. Maybe thats why he was coherent and then became un-coherent and wrecked. Remember post mortem was not done on Diana. Well the medics and docters were obviously in it. So the mask theory is still very plausible.

The CIA has no hard evidence linking it to Diana's crash. So I do not buy that theory, but the French and the British intelligence were definately involved. The French were an odd folk and if you ask a few people they will tell you that Britian runs France. But thats just a few opinions. There are many reasons why France would have wanted to contribute and none of them are happy reasons....

[edit on Jul 22nd 2009 by TheMythLives]



posted on Jul, 24 2009 @ 06:04 PM
link   
French intelligence did not intend to sacrifice one of their own in order to assassinate Diana. James Andanson was not an agent. He was someone who did freelance spying for both French and British agencies. If he had kept his mouth shut and had not started to brag about being in the Alma tunnel that fateful night and about being in possession of photographs he had taken there, he would undoubtedly be still alive today. He became a risk to both the French and the British and was silenced by the Yugoslav assassin, who seems to have been one of their agents, according to the description of him that appears in the French archive I revealed in an earlier post.



posted on Jul, 25 2009 @ 04:28 AM
link   
reply to post by TheMythLives
 

Tell me the reasons. I'd like to hear. You say that Britain runs/controls France, so.....did Britain make France kill Diana so it would seem like Britain had nothing to do with it, maybe?

I've been thinking about the crash, and actually carbon monoxide poisoning can make someone sleepy enough to crash their car. But I guess nobody investigated that very well. Did anybody look for evidence of tampering, like, at the tailpipe? But even if the driver was sleepy, if the white car cut him off and the motorcycle flashed a bright light at him simultaneously, that would really explain the crash. Although he was probably speeding, too, and that didn't help.

In the video, I remember someone saying only a trace amount of Prozac was in the driver's hair. If that is true, it could be that he was off his meds, or discontinued them some time ago, but it depends on the part of his hair that they looked at. If it was near the follicle, where it comes out of the head, he may have been taking it close to the time of the crash. It does take time for a drug to completely leave the body, and get out of the system. But you'd have to talk to a psychiatrist or medical examiner for details about that.

Some things we may never know. But please, tell me why France would want or have to kill Diana.



posted on Jul, 25 2009 @ 04:30 AM
link   
reply to post by micpsi
 

I wasn't actually talking about Andanson being a French agent, I was talking about the driver of Diana's car, Henri Paul. Someone suggested that he was an intelligence agent.



posted on Jul, 25 2009 @ 12:25 PM
link   
reply to post by muffingirl
 





Tell me the reasons. I'd like to hear. You say that Britain runs/controls France, so.....did Britain make France kill Diana so it would seem like Britain had nothing to do with it, maybe?


Well, lets look at it this way. Why wouldn't they want to kill Diana? She knew a lot and was not afraid to speak her mind about anything. It is very possible that France killed her because she knew something about them. Britian could have lied to them and could have paid them off somehow. Maybe it wasn't the entire French intelligence, but a part of British Intelligence spies and French doctors and french authorities that wanted money or needed it. A lot of possibilities of what happened, but usually its about money and of course pride.



posted on Aug, 8 2009 @ 06:21 PM
link   
Tossing this thread a bump, I would freash eyes to view it and let me know if they have questions or comments. In the mean time:


For the most part these wannabe-psychics have been unable to provide documentation or public pronouncements which were on record before the tragic events of that Friday night and early Saturday morning in August, 1997.

For the most part, but not totally. Not 100%. A prediction that Princess Diana would be killed, the same week it actually happened, is part of the official police record in a small police station in the U.K. But, like other such predictions, it was not taken seriously.
Associated Content



posted on Aug, 9 2009 @ 11:11 AM
link   

Originally posted by muffingirl
reply to post by micpsi
 

I wasn't actually talking about Andanson being a French agent, I was talking about the driver of Diana's car, Henri Paul. Someone suggested that he was an intelligence agent.


Henri Paul was not an agent. Like Andanson, he is widely suspected to have been a freelancer who did some spying from time to time for French and British intelligence, as well as for Mossad. That's why he was such a useful patsy for MI6.



posted on Aug, 11 2009 @ 10:42 AM
link   
reply to post by Zerbst
 


That is very true. Also seatbelts may have aslo killed them as well. Seatbelts do kill people on occassion and I think the same would have happened here, my causing severe neck trauma and probably death following shortly after. But the facts are very odd and suspicious the whole turn of events, its just odd.





new topics
 
62
<< 3  4  5    7  8 >>

log in

join