It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

2009: The Year Of ET. Please Watch This Footage!

page: 2
5
<< 1    3 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jul, 8 2009 @ 04:00 AM
link   
reply to post by no1dea
 


...

Phage is big enough to speak for himself.

You are speculating.

...
..
.




posted on Jul, 8 2009 @ 04:04 AM
link   

Originally posted by Sol12
reply to post by no1dea
 


...

Phage is big enough to speak for himself.

You are speculating.

...
..
.


No speculation here.

I have given you facts.

And yes he is big enough to speak for himself.



posted on Jul, 8 2009 @ 04:26 AM
link   
reply to post by no1dea
 


...

What facts?

You didn't point out to any facts regarding these videos?

You only speculate on what it is that you believe, what we should see.

There is actually quite a bit more to be seen
in this footage.

...
..
.



posted on Jul, 8 2009 @ 04:36 AM
link   

Originally posted by Sol12
reply to post by no1dea
 


...

What facts?

You didn't point out to any facts regarding these videos?

You only speculate on what it is that you believe, what we should see.

There is actually quite a bit more to be seen
in this footage.

...
..
.



Originally posted by no1dea

the diamond shape itself is caused by the apature blades between the optics and sensor.

That is an out of focus point of light!
If you are not focused on your subject correctly you will get this lovely fuzzy ball of light with concentric rings.


Oh yes there was some nice sky and scenery in them videos i give you that



posted on Jul, 8 2009 @ 05:28 AM
link   
reply to post by Sol12
 


Hi sol, i hate to say it but i think they ( diamond ones ) are regular light sources.

I recently filmed a light with my camcorder on a tripod for several mins before it turned sideways and turned out to be a plane.

It looked exactly like the first image with the line through.


That said im not sure about the round ones.

Ive had several sightings in my years, one close up large cigar shaped object (looked like a zepplin) late at night that slowly crossed the country lane we were travelling on in front of us that had no lights but had a dull silver glow to it, it even appeared to land in the field a. to the left but in the 5 or so seconds it took for the car to get level it had completely disappeared. That was in the late seventies and in the uk files released recently there was a spate of sightings of this shaped craft at that time.
I dont know if its a factor but we were travelling along Icknield street which is an ancient roman rd running up the uk.

Anyhow sorry to waffle but just wanted to let you know my stance on ufo's.



posted on Jul, 8 2009 @ 06:39 PM
link   
reply to post by cropmuncher
 


Thanks for your contribution Cropmuncher.

Why are you sorry for merely saying something
that you are not willing to argument?

We all have opinions.

I'm not sure to quite understand what you are saying though?

You indicate that you believe the footage shows airplanes?

As you compare them with similar experiences you've had.

You also say they may be 'regular lightsources'?

Well, I would like to firmly stick to this particular footage that I am showing here.

On a side note, I didn't understand your stance on UFOs.

In any case,

I assure you and anyone here,
that I am very familiar with the flight of an airplane,
as a consequence of my background.

The idea to propose that we see airplanes here in this footage
is laughable at the very best.

There is nothing in these videos
that would provide a solid argument for this notion.

...
..
.



posted on Jul, 8 2009 @ 06:54 PM
link   
...

If anyone else would want me to seriously respond
to similar notions, you will have to point out to "something"
regarding the videos on THIS thread.

...

Don't tell me how it looks in another video.

Don't tell me how it may look on a rainy day.

...

An analogy,

Let's say I tell you I saw a car and it looked like a Mercedes and I have a photo.

Then, someone shows me a photograph of a Volkswagen and says:

"Well that car you saw Is not really a car."

"It does not 'seem' like the Volkswagen in my image, therefore it can't be a car."

"So, there is no need for me to even look at your image of your alleged Mercedes."

Now, would that make any sense?

...

For the record;

No one has yet posted a reasonable hypothesis
regarding the footage shown HERE on this thread to show/claim:

- these are planets
- these are airplanes.
- these are tricks/cgi
- these are regular light sources.

The silence here on ATS is deafening, and it speaks louder than words.

'Don't touch what you can't debunk.'

...

As it stands,

I say, its UFOs.

...
..
.



[edit on 8-7-2009 by Sol12]



posted on Jul, 8 2009 @ 07:28 PM
link   
...

Would anyone like to speculate?
...

Here is a summary of what I believe,
we are seeing in the Costa Rica footage:

What we are looking at is a spacecraft.

The spacecraft has an extremely powerful
electro-magnetic core which is both powering
and protecting the ship.

This magnetic core is what gives it it's stunning
radiating appearance.

The craft is hovering more or less stationary.

By the time the filmer shoots half an hour of film,
the earth has meanwhile rotated roughly 500 miles (at the equator).

The spaceship however, stays right there as the guy
is filming it.

As it hovers up there, it needs to compensate for
the natural rotation of earth.

While in orbit or near earth, the Earth's magnetic
field causes an interference with the
electro-magnetic core of the craft.

The craft needs to compensate for this interference,
and it is causing the craft to hover slightly away
at times, as it responds to earth's magnetic flux.

You can see shifting colors, and changing textures
on the craft, also radiating out from it, throughout
the footage.

All these clearly indicate the effects of ionization.

Similar ionization effects can be seen when viewing
the rotating disk in the Ukraine footage.

It is a different and very advanced technology that
we see here.

...

Isn't it pretty amazing?

...
..
.



posted on Jul, 8 2009 @ 07:34 PM
link   
Wow, the OP just won't give up lol. Some people are just hillarious. Those videos are obvious camera zoom problems, I get them all the time. Phages well spent time proving this in his video should have opened your eyes a little bit. Some people will just believe whatever they want sometimes, even when the answer is right infront of them.



posted on Jul, 8 2009 @ 07:39 PM
link   

Originally posted by -NewSense-
... even when the answer is right infront of them.


LoL.

...
..
.



posted on Jul, 9 2009 @ 12:46 AM
link   
...

Look at this amazing footage people.

Watch the first 7 videos posted.

The videos are posted in sequence
as they were filmed.

It's going to take about half an hour.

Take note of the relevance of the context in which
it is filmed, and how it validates it.

I am not asking you to believe me,
nor to agree with me.

Neither should you believe Phage,
or any of the brown tongues.

Make up your own mind.

Watch the videos.

...
..
.



posted on Jul, 9 2009 @ 01:12 AM
link   
phages video, was a diamond... but the video by the poster wasnt a diamond? Like everyone is just wanting to be in phages cool club for a minute.... I mean, if phage seemed to have proved his point, kinda, why does everyone else flame on anyone thinking differently...
But ok if you think it is venus, then maybe it owuld be easier to get a contelation map and show the location of venus by using the moon and since the object was moving SW it could be easily figured out if you know where to look..have fun researchers AND remember
its' re-SEARCH-ers



posted on Jul, 9 2009 @ 01:16 AM
link   
reply to post by Sol12
 


So is the person who filmed the "ufo" and so are you though.



posted on Jul, 9 2009 @ 01:39 AM
link   
okay honestly what do i think it is??? hmmmreally not sure but i damn well dont think that its a planet nor a plane.....wow though...i wish i had a faster computer so i could see the vid better but....again wow...ummm if you follow any of colliers stuff this might make sense....could possibly be a station or something...im not going to say its a satelite either cuz as far as i know satelites arnt diamond shaped, oh and dont bother replying to this trying to debunk my opinions cuz im not going to waste my time going back and forth.



posted on Jul, 9 2009 @ 05:22 AM
link   

Originally posted by Sol12
In fact,

If you search on the web, you'll find that there are
many similar objects being filmed lately.

Here is one in Ukraine:

Ukraine, February 2009.

...


...


Jesus, It's 2009 not 1949. There is absolutely no excuse to have such terrible shaky video footage anymore. You can even get great vid quality from cell phones these days.

Capturing a UFO on video is surely a once in a lifetime opportunity, so you would make sure the had the "object" at least in the center of your viewfinder or whatever else you use.




posted on Jul, 9 2009 @ 07:25 AM
link   
Ok... lets deny some ignorance here for a few, and look at the FACTS:


  • The videos/ images presented by the OP are of bright objects shot (filmed) against a dark background.

  • The "objects" in question are in FACT a product of the lens apprature trying to adjust for the bright light source.

  • This is called "CCD ARTIFACTING"


    Here is a animation to help illustrate this effect:




    To further illustrate this point here is a diagram:



    I hope this helps, I know its not what you want to hear, but the facts are the facts... dont be discouraged and keep lookin up!



  • posted on Jul, 9 2009 @ 07:35 AM
    link   

    Originally posted by Alter-Ego
    Ok... lets deny some ignorance here for a few, and look at the FACTS:


  • The videos/ images presented by the OP are of bright objects shot (filmed) against a dark background.

  • The "objects" in question are in FACT a product of the lens apprature trying to adjust for the bright light source.

  • This is called "CCD ARTIFACTING"


    Here is a animation to help illustrate this effect:




    To further illustrate this point here is a diagram:



    I hope this helps, I know its not what you want to hear, but the facts are the facts... dont be discouraged and keep lookin up!



  • Facts are no good to sol.

    Anyway for thoes who are willing to listen that is a good representation of iris blades in your reply, although most consumer camcorders and cameras have fewer blades which cause the diamon rather than hexagonal or pentagonal etc shape.
    Its in many youtube video done with a camcorder, you can see it even in lens flares sometimes



    posted on Jul, 9 2009 @ 06:53 PM
    link   
    ...


    Originally posted by soldier8828
    okay honestly what do i think it is??? hmmmreally not sure but i damn well dont think that its a planet nor a plane.....wow though...




    ...
    ..
    .



    posted on Jul, 9 2009 @ 07:46 PM
    link   
    reply to post by Alter-Ego
     


    ...

    Thanks all for your contributions.

    And thanks again, for the little discourse on the
    workings of a camera.

    Let's stick to the footage posted right here.

    ...

    Alter-Ego,

    Where are your "FACTS"?

    You wrote;

    "The videos/images presented by the OP are of bright
    objects shot (filmed) against a dark background."

    Take a look at this image:

    It is a screenshot from the second video, in the
    additional series of 4 videos taken on the 4th of January
    posted on page 1.

    The guy is demonstrating the camera, and clearly
    filming the object while there is still a lot of light
    outside in the late afternoon.



    (The first video of the second series of 4 is where he
    starts the demonstration, by filming the Moon.)

    ...

    As for the remainder of your post:

    The footage presented here, is filmed while using
    several different camera settings, as one can clearly
    understand, when viewing the footage.

    (see screenshots on top of page 1)

    You have only briefly commented on one though?

    You have not explained in any way the light phenomena
    on and around object in the footage?

    What about the vibrant colors?

    What about the radiating appearance?

    What about the morphing textures?

    You have not explained why object appears to remain
    virtually stationary, aligned to the porch from where
    he is filming?

    You have not explained why object appears sometimes
    as if "sinking down" even though the camera is mounted
    solid on a tripod?

    I could go on.

    Where are your "FACTS"?

    Better, I post some additional videos that will point
    out to the readers that this object is clearly
    NOT 'lens-effect' or anything similar.

    ...
    ..
    .



    posted on Jul, 9 2009 @ 07:54 PM
    link   
    ...

    Okay, here we go.

    Very similar objects filmed around the world.

    ...

    I will give three examples:

    One on Fox News, one on Russian TV, and one in
    Massachusetts in a guys back yard.

    Take a good look at these videos, and see the striking
    resemblance with the objects filmed in Costa Rica.

    ...

    Here is the footage that was filmed in Massachusetts
    december 5th 2008, with the object hovering in the
    guys backyard.

    As he is filming it, you recognize the shape of trees,
    standing between the camera and the hovering object.



    ...

    Now, have a look at the following video of another
    very similar object on Russian TV:



    ...

    And finally,

    Another strikingly similar object in a news item on
    FOX news:



    ...
    ..
    .



    new topics

    top topics



     
    5
    << 1    3 >>

    log in

    join