It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Tank2/8
Wouldnt everyone spending it be a good thing? Assume that the majority paid off dept. Dept that was plaguing the banks. Would the consumer not be quicker to continue to spend and keep the flow going?
Originally posted by KarlG
If they put it into buying new cars - it would actually help.
Originally posted by I Am Spartacus
Originally posted by Tank2/8
reply to post by I Am Spartacus
The consumption tread mill will never stop. Is it benefiting us that the banks are using our bail out to pay their foreign dept??
The consumption treadmill is borrowing money to pay for crap that you absolutely HAVE to have right now and can't wait until you can afford it (not to mention NEED it), even if you can't - and the fact that you and everyone else do it and accept it is what creates our bubble economies.
And yes, it does HAVE to end.
This debtors world that we created is not that old.
Originally posted by KarlG
Originally posted by Tank2/8
Wouldnt everyone spending it be a good thing? Assume that the majority paid off dept. Dept that was plaguing the banks. Would the consumer not be quicker to continue to spend and keep the flow going?
Exactly. YOU GET how the economy works.
if consumer spending increase it WOULD be good.
Debt would be paid off and the economy would actually increase.
But, see, consumers won't spend. They'd rather save for a rainy day. They'll put off a couple of bills, maintaining the debt, and by saving, they'll further remove the money from the economic flow - which is not good.
That's why the money CANNOT go to the consumers.
Originally posted by KarlG
reply to post by Tank2/8
You want an answer?
Very easy.
From an economical academic POV,
A stimulus is meant to do exactly that - STIMULATE the economy. If money goes into the pockets of Americans all over, guess what would happen?
People would SAVE.
i.e. they would take the money given to them, and instead of spending it on the consumer durables, bill payments, and luxury goods, they would stash it away in banks where it will 1) not be of any use to the economy anymore and 2) get used by lousy good-for-nothing bank executives.
And that is why the economic stimulus is going to the big firms - because they are more likely to need help to NOT crash and cause more trouble, and also because if they can get past this period they can then start to make money for the US economy.
TextAbout the only down side I can think of this is that the price of things would get jacked up because buisnesses would know that everyone has $50grand in their pocket. But price gouging could be stemmed to a point.
they would be back to financing cars and home theaters in no time. Just try to control it a bit better. Screen for better credit. Come up with better systems to keep people who cant handle the credit they where given.
Originally posted by Tank2/8
Wouldnt everyone spending it be a good thing? Assume that the majority paid off dept. Dept that was plaguing the banks. Would the consumer not be quicker to continue to spend and keep the flow going?
Originally posted by Bearack
Originally posted by Tank2/8
Wouldnt everyone spending it be a good thing? Assume that the majority paid off dept. Dept that was plaguing the banks. Would the consumer not be quicker to continue to spend and keep the flow going?
The problem isn't that spending is good or bad but how it's spent. If everyone was given a portion of the 800b, they would spend it on everything and anything. This would lead to hyper inflation to an extreme.
Just imaging everyone getting 3 million dollars. Would you have any reservations on buying a gallon of milk for, lets say $25.
Well, $25 for a gallon of milk would actually be an extremely conservative cost. Auto's, homes, candy bars would sky rocket. Now, what happens when everyone spends their 3 million dollars. How do you expect people to pay for a $5,000 mortgage or $100 a week for milk?