It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Should we take a sample of Michael Jacksons DNA for the future cloning database?

page: 2
0
<< 1   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jul, 7 2009 @ 07:05 PM
link   

Originally posted by mblahnikluver
You do realize that by using his DNA it WONT be Michael Jackson right? I have a twin and we have the same DNA (phenotypes are different) so does that mean we are the same person? Same concept with using MJ or anyone else's DNA. It may look like them but the mind and personality will develop differently.



Yes I'm aware that they won't be the same person or "soul" thats why I'm talking about talented people. Would he not have the same vocal chords and sing the same? Would Einstein not have the same size of brain and be as smart?




posted on Jul, 7 2009 @ 07:07 PM
link   
yeah ... if you want our kids to be around a guy that likes kids



posted on Jul, 7 2009 @ 07:12 PM
link   
Again I would say no. I can only go on the twin thing since we have the same DNA. We both have different talents and that goes along with your mind developing differently IMO. I dont think a clone of anyone spectacular would ever really be the "original" person they were cloned from. They may look like them but I dont really think anything else would be the same. Also wouldnt it be sad to know that you were made only to be someone you are not? I have always IMO thought cloning was wrong. I dont see the point honestly. I know there are medical reasons for some but still I dont get it. I wouldnt want to clone anyone really....but hypothetically if they did become the person they were cloned after then I say clone Shakespeare, I have a lot of questions to ask him..



BTW I see what you are asking and I am sorry if I come across mean or rude. It is a nice thought to clone someone but I just dont see the point.



posted on Jul, 7 2009 @ 07:12 PM
link   

Originally posted by Faiol
yeah ... if you want our kids to be around a guy that likes kids



Ok we've already established it doesn't have to be Jacko but any "talented" person like Ole Blue Eyes himself!



Where'd all the scientists go with all the info?
They were here a minute ago!

I think I asked a valid question in; Will the clones sound like the original and be able to sing or dance like them?[i\]



posted on Jul, 7 2009 @ 07:14 PM
link   

Originally posted by Faiol
yeah ... if you want our kids to be around a guy that likes kids


I am going to assume you mean likes kids as in he likes to donate to their charities and help them out because the other meaning is just completely rude and uncalled for. I have had enough of the "kid" jabs at MJ.



posted on Jul, 7 2009 @ 07:16 PM
link   

Originally posted by mblahnikluver
but hypothetically if they did become the person they were cloned after then I say clone Shakespeare, I have a lot of questions to ask him..



Now even I know thats not possible cos they'l have different live experiences and different outlooks on things. You could only ask him about his future life.


What you need is a seance!



posted on Jul, 7 2009 @ 07:16 PM
link   
reply to post by hey1212
 


Einstein's brain had nothing to do with how smart he was, neither was Michael jackon's vocal chords. It was their experiences, their education and their ability to understand.

Me and Einstein have the same brain, he just was smart enough to use more of it.

~Keeper



posted on Jul, 7 2009 @ 07:26 PM
link   

Originally posted by tothetenthpower
reply to post by hey1212
 


Einstein's brain had nothing to do with how smart he was, neither was Michael jackon's vocal chords. It was their experiences, their education and their ability to understand.

Me and Einstein have the same brain, he just was smart enough to use more of it.

~Keeper



Your sort of contradicting yourself there.

Your saying that Einstein's smartness had nothing to do with his brain yet he was smart enough to use his brain more? Then where did he get his smartness to use his brain more


And vocal chords are a physical thing so they should be the same. It wasn't Jacko's experience or education that enabled him to be able to sing.



posted on Jul, 7 2009 @ 07:40 PM
link   
reply to post by hey1212
 


Yeah I know that is why I said hypothetically..hehe

mmmm seance...I will get one that



posted on Jul, 7 2009 @ 09:57 PM
link   
Why did I even bother to open this thread?

F* Michael Jackson. I think right now we could use a Thomas Jefferson, George Washington, and a few other like minded people.



posted on Jul, 20 2009 @ 11:04 AM
link   
reply to post by hey1212
 


Yes, by all means, lets create a whole army of Michael Jackson's to scare the children in the future. He could be like the next "Boogie Man" that parents can use to scare their children.

"Johnny, if you don't go to bed, Michael Jackson will get you!"
"Son, if you don't do your chores, the Michael Jackson will get you!"



new topics

top topics



 
0
<< 1   >>

log in

join