It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Yes, he was aquitted, but so was OJ
holding a label upon someone who remains Not Guilty is utterly wrong, and runs contrary to everything which our Justice System stands for.
perhaps the politician ought to stick to doing his job. what he has there is a personal opinion and using the exposure and platform that comes with his office to express a personal opinion is an abuse of power
Originally posted by JaxonRoberts
reply to post by Champagne
I would counter with the 'cult of celebrity'. It sickens me that someone who obviously was a deeply troubled individual, and very well may have been guilty of crimes against children, is given martyr or sainthood status just because they could sing and dance and write songs. Yes, he gave millions of dollars to charity, but does this forgive him for other transgressions? Does this make him so important that you cannot find any news source that is not totally centered on his death, his memorial, etc.? The largest death toll of American Service Members in one day in the Afghan war occurs on the same day as his death, and it got very little coverage.
Originally posted by JaxonRoberts
reply to post by oneclickaway
It was two children, two separate cases, both settled out of court and gag orders attached to them, forbidding those children from ever speaking of it again. Since the only reason to settle those cases is because you are losing, this to me does not signify an innocent man. And in the criminal case, the victim was put on trial, as usual, by his high priced lawyers. Add this to his very visible unhealthy attraction to children (instead of candy, he had a frakkin' amusement park to entice the kiddies with), and it's enough info for me to believe that he was a sick and twisted individual! Sorry, but I'm not drinking the Kool-aid with this 'cult of celebrity'!
Originally posted by Majestic23
And if your child were molested what amount of money or legalities will make you pretend it didnt happen?
Originally posted by JaxonRoberts
Originally posted by Majestic23
And if your child were molested what amount of money or legalities will make you pretend it didnt happen?
There isn't enough money in the world! It wouldn't even make it to court! I would be the one needing a lawyer! But that's just me. Some people actually trust the Justice system.
Originally posted by JaxonRoberts
reply to post by Majestic23
I wouldn't, but that's just me. I did get your point. Factor in the high priced lawyers and such, plus losing the criminal case in the case of the second child, they just probably followed the advice of their lawyers. On the other side of the coin, if you were accused of child molestation, would you settle out of court if you were innocent? I sure as hell wouldn't! Especially if I were that much in the public eye!
Originally posted by Majestic23
Is your sig meant to be ironic or something?