Representative Peter King of New York speaks out about Michael Jackson! Good for him!, page 2


Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 5 times


reply posted on 6-7-2009 @ 10:03 PM by Champagne
Excuse me a moment while I go throw up somewhere...........

The more I read some comments, by some posters here, the more I understand why I dislike most people in this country today!! I become more, and more, disgusted daily - not just by politicians, who ignore our Constitution - but by the very people the Constitution was written for....the people of the USA.

Yes, he was aquitted, but so was OJ


Indeed!! There is a very big difference between the 2!! There was simply not enough EVIDENCE to convict MJ. Whereas, there was tons of evidence to convict OJ - they just did not!! To compare the two is not rational. Just an easy out........

holding a label upon someone who remains Not Guilty is utterly wrong, and runs contrary to everything which our Justice System stands for.


Thus the reason for my rant about the fricking people in this country. On the one hand, you shout for the freedoms the Constitution gives. On the other hand, you want to condemn someone (found innocent because of LACK OF EVIDENCE) because your opinion is MJ is a pedophile!!! What does that say about your opinion about the Constitution??

perhaps the politician ought to stick to doing his job. what he has there is a personal opinion and using the exposure and platform that comes with his office to express a personal opinion is an abuse of power


Exactly......what this man is doing is looking for votes. Anyone, nowdays, who does not understand the way media overcovers some things, and puts others things in the back ground, has not been paying attention. This has been going on forever!!

Just to note: MJ is to music is what Elvis was to his generation. Quite frankly, from the moment we heard he had been rushed to the damn hospital, and possible in a coma, they have been broadcasting everything about him!! The good - and the bad. Did no one notice?? No one has been trying to make MJ out as a saint. Just like they could not with Elvis.....or Diana.....or JFK.

Any person, who has made a major contribution to this planet, has had great points, and bad points, about their behavior while alive. That's because they ALL have 1 very important thing in common. THEY WERE ALL HUMAN!!!







reply posted on 7-7-2009 @ 02:18 PM by JaxonRoberts
reply to post by Champagne



I would counter with the 'cult of celebrity'. It sickens me that someone who obviously was a deeply troubled individual, and very well may have been guilty of crimes against children, is given martyr or sainthood status just because they could sing and dance and write songs. Yes, he gave millions of dollars to charity, but does this forgive him for other transgressions? Does this make him so important that you cannot find any news source that is not totally centered on his death, his memorial, etc.? The largest death toll of American Service Members in one day in the Afghan war occurs on the same day as his death, and it got very little coverage.


reply posted on 7-7-2009 @ 02:33 PM by Champagne
Originally posted by JaxonRoberts
reply to
post by Champagne



I would counter with the 'cult of celebrity'. It sickens me that someone who obviously was a deeply troubled individual, and very well may have been guilty of crimes against children, is given martyr or sainthood status just because they could sing and dance and write songs. Yes, he gave millions of dollars to charity, but does this forgive him for other transgressions? Does this make him so important that you cannot find any news source that is not totally centered on his death, his memorial, etc.? The largest death toll of American Service Members in one day in the Afghan war occurs on the same day as his death, and it got very little coverage.


Yes.....and such is life!! Been going on for a long, long time and will not change any time soon. Welcome to reality and the way people in this world are.





reply posted on 7-7-2009 @ 04:56 PM by oneclickaway
reply to post by JaxonRoberts


And what has been your massive contribution to the world exactly? Michael Jackson was certainly troubled, but with that much hounding and exposure I doubt that you would have fared much better. If, unlike most posting here, you have a heightened sensitivity, then that life combined with those unfounded allegations would make anyone go off the rails.
What’s normal to you…a hardened heart, no empathy, no sensitivity? Who would you admire…some farting, aggressive, coarse mouthed, unfeeling, beer swilling fool?
He was just too sensitive for this ugly world and had the means to insulate himself from it.
Does his giving money to charity forgive him for what transgressions? He was never found guilty of anything. Apart from one child’s scumbag father wishing to get rich, no other child has accused him of any misconduct. Maybe that’s because he didn’t do anything…duh?
Actually it’s much more of a disgrace that most obviously believed the media allegations in the first place, whilst condemning everything else the media comes up with as lies, and made that sensitive soul’s life a misery from which he could never then escape.
Rest in peace Michael, these fools can’t hurt you now.

Any politician making comments like that should be instantly locked away before they cause any more damage as they, like most, are totally unfit to hold office.


reply posted on 7-7-2009 @ 05:09 PM by dgtempe
reply to post by oneclickaway



Thank you for articulating my feelings better than i could have.

And thank you for being a sensitive human being


reply posted on 7-7-2009 @ 05:09 PM by JaxonRoberts
reply to post by oneclickaway



It was two children, two separate cases, both settled out of court and gag orders attached to them, forbidding those children from ever speaking of it again. Since the only reason to settle those cases is because you are losing, this to me does not signify an innocent man. And in the criminal case, the victim was put on trial, as usual, by his high priced lawyers. Add this to his very visible unhealthy attraction to children (instead of candy, he had a frakkin' amusement park to entice the kiddies with), and it's enough info for me to believe that he was a sick and twisted individual! Sorry, but I'm not drinking the Kool-aid with this 'cult of celebrity'!


reply posted on 7-7-2009 @ 05:20 PM by Majestic23
Originally posted by JaxonRoberts
reply to
post by oneclickaway



It was two children, two separate cases, both settled out of court and gag orders attached to them, forbidding those children from ever speaking of it again. Since the only reason to settle those cases is because you are losing, this to me does not signify an innocent man. And in the criminal case, the victim was put on trial, as usual, by his high priced lawyers. Add this to his very visible unhealthy attraction to children (instead of candy, he had a frakkin' amusement park to entice the kiddies with), and it's enough info for me to believe that he was a sick and twisted individual! Sorry, but I'm not drinking the Kool-aid with this 'cult of celebrity'!



And if your child were molested what amount of money or legalities will make you pretend it didnt happen?

As for the politician, its attention grabbing and desparite. Hanging onto, even in death, the coat tails of man with more influence then he could ever have. As for the allegations there are none so pure as the purified.

[edit on 7-7-2009 by Majestic23]


reply posted on 7-7-2009 @ 05:31 PM by oneclickaway
reply to post by dgtempe


No, thank you!
It was your post that made me post something. Nice to meet you!


reply posted on 7-7-2009 @ 05:48 PM by oneclickaway
reply to post by JaxonRoberts


Oh sorry, you obviously were in the courtroom and have complete knowledge of everything that went on, before and during the case…or did you get your info from the mainstream media perchance. Case closed.
The first charge settled out of court was so obviously a total scam by a twisted father who will undoubtedly be very sorry one day.
Let me enlighten you as to the attraction he had to children. Although his actions were extremely unwise in a world so pathetically out of touch with reality that it even sees a hug between relatives as sick and criminal, I believe that what he saw in children was not just a wish to construct his missing childhood, but also that he saw children as totally innocent and unsullied. That innocence is something that is rarely found in adults. He was an artist, a highly skilled and accomplished artist. Real artists often have a hard time fitting into the harshness and savagery of the world as they are often more in touch with their spirituality and whatever is beyond this world. Children are still half in the beyond, until adults destroy their bubble and force them into this reality. I think that too was the attraction in being around kids. The ‘sickness’ and ‘perversion’ is often in the mind of the beholder than actually real or true.


reply posted on 7-7-2009 @ 06:05 PM by JaxonRoberts
reply to post by oneclickaway



So, I guess you were his psychoanalyst. You are entitled to your opinion, and I am entitled to mine. And just for the record, the MSM sugar coated the hell out of the criminal trial!


reply posted on 7-7-2009 @ 06:08 PM by JaxonRoberts
reply to post by Majestic23



I wouldn't, but that's just me. I did get your point. Factor in the high priced lawyers and such, plus losing the criminal case in the case of the second child, they just probably followed the advice of their lawyers. On the other side of the coin, if you were accused of child molestation, would you settle out of court if you were innocent? I sure as hell wouldn't! Especially if I were that much in the public eye!


reply posted on 7-7-2009 @ 06:58 PM by Majestic23
Originally posted by JaxonRoberts
reply to
post by Majestic23



I wouldn't, but that's just me. I did get your point. Factor in the high priced lawyers and such, plus losing the criminal case in the case of the second child, they just probably followed the advice of their lawyers. On the other side of the coin, if you were accused of child molestation, would you settle out of court if you were innocent? I sure as hell wouldn't! Especially if I were that much in the public eye!


Or maybe he couldant take such allegations anymore and paid for them to go away, maybe he couldant trust the courts either. We dont know if he was a peado or not, all I know for certain is that if my child was molested I would want for the worst to happen to the culprit. Money wouldant even come into it and the courts wouldant stop me.

Is your sig meant to be ironic or something?
Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>    ^^TOP^^



Mitt Romney, The Life Saving Hero
  Posted 10 days ago with 19 member flags
Why is NBC doing a Story on Mormonism Tonight?
  Posted 19 days ago with 12 member flags
Funniest pic of the year
  Posted 19 days ago with 10 member flags
Homeless Isaac Victim: Romney Told Me To \'Go Home And Call 211\'
  Posted 10 days ago with 8 member flags