It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
posted by blue tree leaver
Sorry for taking a while to post but I wanted the debunkers to have time for a proper rebuttal. It takes a while to research things like this. I have tried to reason with people about this subject but generally to no avail.
Originally posted by blue tree leaver
As my good friend Gorilla Monsoon would have said: "Well Jesse, conspicuous by their absence are the debunkers".
"Dr. Jones acknowledges that his investigation is still in the research phase and that questions regarding the viability of his theory remain unanswered. For example, it is unknown how thermite’s destructive process could have been applied and initiated simultaneously on so many beams – in several buildings – undetected and/or under such extreme conditions. It is also unusual that no demolition personnel at any level noticed telltale signs of thermite’s degenerative “fingerprint” on any beams during the eight months of debris removal."
Originally posted by esdad71
Again, I have said this before and he says it here. Where is the true demolition evidence?
Originally Posted by Russia Today interview 7/9 2009 Niels Harrit: “And actually, when there is a fire in the United States, which is suspicious, or which is violent, or which is unexpected, according to some regulation, you should look for thermite. Because you can use it for arson; and if you want to burn your house, this is the way to do it. You cook up a thermite reaction, and you go on vacation, and you can trigger it with your cell phone at a long distance, if you wish. So, this is routine for the FBI to look for remains of thermite. This they do very frequently actually. But they didn’t do it this time.”