posted on Aug, 3 2009 @ 01:46 PM
I know this has been mentioned before, but always keeping the original images right from the camera, is not about seeing something interesting (ufo,
ghost, whatever) in your images it is about being able to go back to them and possibly do something different with them. Even as an armature
photographer you should be aware of this. If you are going for creative expression through your photography, you always go back to the originals as a
starting point. It helps give you a fresh view on your work and to see how far you have come from your original, just a tip for your future
photography.
On the actual photograph itself, I see no overlay of an image such as you would in a tampered with photo, so it either a very good fake or is a good
photograph of an actual UFO, and where I normally would not go in this direction I am going to go with a good photo of a UFO. I could be mistaken and
proved to be wrong, but just because the original picture can’t be produced, does not indicate a fake especially if my guess below is
substantiated.
I am guessing that you downloaded pictures, deleted them from the camera, and edited the pictures as you stated you do with all your pictures, did not
notice this object until you viewed the full size version of the pic or when you blew the pic up, which is the point at which you decided to post it
here to see what the opinion of it was. Am I correct in that guess that I made or am I completely off?
[edit on 8/3/2009 by AlienCarnage]