UFO releases intelligent moving spheres!! First ever video footage!, page 8

privacy

Pages: << 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 633 times

reply posted on 5-7-2009 @ 06:18 PM by tallpaul1984

Simply astounding!! this video stands out beyond all others by miles!

reply posted on 5-7-2009 @ 06:19 PM by DGFenrir

Ah..

The best footage ever. No way this could be CGI. Noone can fake a video like that.

S&F!!

reply posted on 5-7-2009 @ 06:21 PM by grayghost

S&F

Outstanding footage.

I really wish the video was clear....But sometimes we take what we can get.

This is very interesting to say the least.

reply posted on 5-7-2009 @ 06:24 PM by elysiumfire

Great video! I must admit to being somewhat unimpressed until around the 4.36 mark and the fellow zoomed his camera onto the object and we see it ejecting the spheres...now that WAS something!

I do not think them to be balloons, as some look to be buffeted by thermals and winds, whilst others nearby are unaffected. The sense I got was that they were acting like Bees flying out of the hive and collecting pollen. I think these spheres could possibly be probes sensing and measuring the chemical and gaseous constitution of our atmosphere?

reply posted on 5-7-2009 @ 06:25 PM by Kaifan

Originally posted by Yummy Freelunch
I just watched this on youtube, and as I'm not usually impressed by ufo vids, this one was pretty amazing. It's all in spanish, someone has added sub titles.. but I gather the guy taping it was on a bus, at first, and told the bus driver to stop so he could continue taping. There are plenty of points to show distance, and its a very clear video. Tell me what you think! Also, I didnt embed it here, sorry. At about 4:33 into the video, they really start dancing!

VIDEO

[edit on 5-7-2009 by Yummy Freelunch]

Mod Edit: Removed all caps.

[edit on 5-7-2009 by Gemwolf]

Hello,

Nice video, i wonder why nobody has made this connection, so i call first!

The first thing this video made me think was of a very well known phenomena from ww2, foo fighters, which is documented by pilots from both the USA and Germany, and also was seen by several other countries, at least Japan pilots noticed them too.

As the story goes, foo fighters were very little spheres or dots which followed the airplane formations very closely and in a few cases crashed into the airplanes, i don't remember where i read about some of theme crashing and disappearing without causing any damage to the planes but i will try to find it and post it here.

But anyway, as far as we know, the only purpose they had was to be something like 'observers' to the war events, they followed very closely plane formations, if the planes moved to the left, they would also move to the left so that they would keep the distance and follow the same flying patterns, at least that's how pilots described them, of course we don't really know, but these spheres look a lot like those.

Here's a link to some pics:

www.santafeghostandhistorytours.com...

But those same images can be found on google if you don't like that source, i just linked to it since it had a few images on the same page aand was the first one i found (lazy).

If i were to say what i think they are, i would say we are looking at foo fighters, and then it could be completely fake, who knows

Kai

reply posted on 5-7-2009 @ 06:26 PM by rapinbatsisaltherage

reply to post by easynow

I second that easynow, I'm positive that I saw this video at least six months ago and I've seen others from the same man. So far have yet to pinpoint the exact location and I've never seen reports of anyone else coming forward. Seems odd, you think more people would have reported such a sighting.

reply posted on 5-7-2009 @ 06:28 PM by DGFenrir

The other people were probably sleeping or shopping or something. The guy who recorded them is the only one who was looking up.

reply posted on 5-7-2009 @ 06:28 PM by zorgon

Originally posted by liquidsmoke206
but where's Phage, ATS's most overrated debunker, to tell us that this is nothing more than a plastic bag blowing in the wind?

Well we are on page 7 and the usual list of debunkers have not yet swooped in on this. Normally you will see the regulars on page one but at least by page two..

The fact that NONE of them have offered an opinion is extremely telling.

Debunkers rarely tackle something they cannot explain... at least not until they work out a game plan

Page seven and only one "Its CGI" That has to be a record on ATS considering the number of flags and stars... Normally that would have been a beacon for these guys

We have a winner

reply posted on 5-7-2009 @ 06:29 PM by _Phoenix_

reply to post by Kaifan

Go out at night and watch the sky carefully, eventually you will see something like these spheres/starlike objects.

Wether they are satellites or something more is up to your conclusion.

[edit on 5-7-2009 by _Phoenix_]

reply posted on 5-7-2009 @ 06:30 PM by zorgon

Has anyone looked... were the objects BEHIND the plane at any time? If so that would give a size comparison. I didn't stop frame it yet so I didn't see... I willl send this to Luna Cognita and see what can be done

reply posted on 5-7-2009 @ 06:30 PM by rapinbatsisaltherage

reply to post by Kaifan

Thanks for the link! Very interesting theory. I've seen a few photos like that with orbs around a Concorde jet over the United Kingdom.

Originally posted by DGFenrir
The other people were probably sleeping or shopping or something. The guy who recorded them is the only one who was looking up.

I don't know if I buy that explanation though, it's day light, the sun is shining and there is a clear sky and no one else sees the golden UFO releasing spheres?

[edit on 5-7-2009 by rapinbatsisaltherage]

reply posted on 5-7-2009 @ 06:33 PM by easynow

Originally posted by rapinbatsisaltherage
reply to post by easynow

I second that easynow, I'm positive that I saw this video at least six months ago and I've seen others from the same man. So far have yet to pinpoint the exact location and I've never seen reports of anyone else coming forward. Seems odd, you think more people would have reported such a sighting.

yea you would think more people would have seen this but i have personally witnessed a UFO that i would have sworn somebody else would have also seen but i never ever heard about any other reports of it.

bottom line is:

just because no other reports about it are staring us in the face right this minute, does not mean it did not happen.

how many people would be looking up at that exact moment and from the looks of the UFO when it is originally shown in the FOV, it doesn't stand out like the jet does. it just isn't as obvious as jet or a plane would be. just my 2 cents

reply posted on 5-7-2009 @ 06:33 PM by Akezzon

If I have understood it correctly this guy is a "watcher", so he runs around looking up in the sky alot more than the common citizen I presume.
That would probably explain why he have more videos.

And the reason why Mexico City and S. America have such a huge number of sightings might, I say might since it is only a specualtion, be because of their past connection with the Mayan and Aztek people. Alot of ancient sightings seems to be from that area. I might be wrong though ofc.

[edit on 5-7-2009 by Akezzon]

reply posted on 5-7-2009 @ 06:33 PM by DGFenrir

Zorgon, if it's a winner then why not present it to wider audience? It is obvious aliens after all. There is no way they can doubt this..
The CGI explanation wasn't accepted and let's ignore the possibility. Repeat after me: "There is no such thing as CGI".

reply posted on 5-7-2009 @ 06:34 PM by cooler

reply to post by DGFenrir

i agree it is very good video...........but their are very very good 3d digital artists today & this could be done.
the particles could be animated in maya or other 3d software then exported into vue infinate for a realistic back ground. the same proccess could also be reversed export the realitic back ground from vue infinate int maya,
also if this is cgi the complete animation could be rendered on a laptop !.
in todays digital world im afraid any exotic alien craft are going to have to do a lot better than be filmed to be convincing as evidence goes.

reply posted on 5-7-2009 @ 06:36 PM by gormly

Originally posted by fls13

Originally posted by necati
Some astonishing footage. Hope this will not turn out to be some sophisticated particle rendering engine of one of those major 3d_appz like 3dsMax or Maya. If not it's really mind boggling!

Some fascinating video. The shaky cam effect would be the toughest to reproduce. Generating a .bvh file based on the head movement of the shooter and then loading it into the camera within the 3d app seems to me to be a doable solution as I ponder it awhile.

It's either a great hoax or something extraordinary, I don't think there's any in between here.

Now THATS funny.

This is a new technique for believers. Be ambiguous and then offer some reasoning while pretending they know what they are talking about in an unrealated area so the rest of the uninformed will fall in line lock step.

LOL.. "Generating a .bvh file based on the head movement of the shooter and then loading it into the camera"

To the uninformed you just lent this credibility of being real by pretending to know what you are talking about and applying it to this situation. Well done, this technique is new and is being used increasingly to lend credibility to all types of situation posted on ATS.

I'd almost say there is a conspiracy to 'credabilitize' conspiracies!!
(yea for me.. a new word)

Loading it into the camera huh?

I am not going to "debunk" this video, there is no point anymore, I can render something similar easily enough. Who knows, it might be real, it might not. Today you just can't tell.
(Yes, I would like it to be real)

Anyone who has some skills and the desire can create a convincing video, add grain, perspective, a foreign interview and whalla...you all make it sound like this is impossible which is highly laughable, the worse the video the easier it is to make and it seems like the easier it is to convince people.

Shaky cam and zoom in and glow out are NOT hard things to reproduce in CGI, but they ARE hard to comprehend by people who know nothing about the software out there.

again, who knows it COULD be real, but for those of you who dismiss CGI off hand based on this video.. you are as bad as the "debunkers" you wax on about.

Note for those who don't know:

A .bvh file is a Biovision hierarchical motion file, a text file that contains motion data.

Anyone interested can look it up and see how hillarious "loading it into the camera" sounds.

reply posted on 5-7-2009 @ 06:37 PM by GorehoundLarry

reply to post by zorgon

It's most likely CGI

You can probably do this with Particles, in Motion. Just have different objects spurting them out with emissions to the left and to the right.

reply posted on 5-7-2009 @ 06:37 PM by DGFenrir

reply to post by rapinbatsisaltherage

Well it is quite difficult to lift your head up and look into the sky. Maybe the objects were too faint for the human eye to see.. Maybe the people were skeptics and dismissed them as satellites etc..

reply to post by cooler

Nooo. CGI doesn't exist. It was made up by the devil and Hollywood. You can't make a big dot and blur it and make it move.

reply posted on 5-7-2009 @ 06:38 PM by zorgon

Originally posted by GorehoundLarry
It's most likely CGI
You can probably do this with Particles, in Motion. Just have different objects spurting them out with emissions to the left and to the right.

"most likely"
"probably"

Ok show me...

In the meantime anyone have any camera data?

reply posted on 5-7-2009 @ 06:39 PM by IgnoreTheFacts

Originally posted by zorgon

Well we are on page 7 and the usual list of debunkers have not yet swooped in on this. Normally you will see the regulars on page one but at least by page two...The fact that NONE of them have offered an opinion is extremely telling.

First of all, there are no debunkers on here in the fashion that you guys dream of. There are only those of us that have the ability to use logic, reason and common sense to separate faith and belief from actual discussion.

Second, one can assume they are not "running scared" of this "extraordinary video" but that it is a Sunday after a major holiday, and checking ATS every 5 minutes to see someone's wet dream of a short, meaningless video and comment on it is not their highest priority. I.E. most of us have a life.