It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ufopunx
I don't know if someone think about that before as I didn't read the 60+ pages but does anybody else think that it could be someone juggling with some balls?
Isn't that a bit harsh? That's like someone going into church for the first time, and saying they know nothing of the Bible, and someone turns to them and goes, "ummmm, we're in a sermon right now. Why don't you just read the whole Bible to get up to speed, and then come talk to me".
Originally posted by Arbitrageur
Originally posted by ufopunx
I don't know if someone think about that before as I didn't read the 60+ pages but does anybody else think that it could be someone juggling with some balls?
You're sorta right and sorta wrong. They look more like helium-filled balloons than balls and the juggling is likely not being done by a person but by air turbulence.
Maybe you should go back and read the 60 pages to get up to speed?
Originally posted by waveguide3
So does nobody think it strange that the second witness to the 'event' is a 'friend' of Haimie Maussan? Not strange that his video is being kept under wraps?
WG3
Originally posted by waveguide3
So does nobody think it strange that the second witness to the 'event' is a 'friend' of Haimie Maussan? Not strange that his video is being kept under wraps? That Mr Carrillo doesn't know the difference between Venus and a metal sphere?
WG3
Originally posted by avat178
'Friend' as in a 'youtube' friend or a 'personal' friend?
Originally posted by Decoy
But I feel Mex not having nukes or debilitating radar may be one of the reasons their-there? Big Time.
Originally posted by Arbitrageur
reply to post by easynow
Thanks Easynow, good find, this one is clearer!
Check out time index 2:37-2:50, the yellow thing looks something like a big plastic sack fluttering in the wind, except tied to a string at some part of it (usually the left side looks like it's anchored to a string, the right part is fluttering though it rotates).
Originally posted by waveguide3
It's clear that Mr Hernandez' camcorder is a pretty low resolution device. The very small aperture attests to that. Forget all the optical zoom capabilities. Resolution is about aperture size and this camera is rowres, especially in capturing targets at this distance.
Originally posted by waveguide3
As an example, notice the short sequence at 2:52 - 2:57.
The four dots dancing around the blob.
That exact same sequence is repeated at higher resolution at 5:02 - 5:07.
In the second showing we can even see the blob rotating.
The only way the second higher res sequence could be obtained is in a separate filming of the same action. There is no other way of doing it. To get a second recording, the action has to be choreographed as in a 3D script of some kind. Maya, LightWave, etc, etc can all do this stuff.
WG3
Originally posted by Arbitrageur
I thought resolution was determined mostly by the number of pixels in the CCD that captures the image?
You may not have read the whole thread but it was previously explained that what Maussen is presenting in these videos is a combination of both the original footage, and then replays, some with enhancements done by the TV studio.
So don't assume what you see is all raw footage,
Originally posted by Sam60
Originally posted by Arbitrageur
reply to post by easynow
Thanks Easynow, good find, this one is clearer!
Check out time index 2:37-2:50, the yellow thing looks something like a big plastic sack fluttering in the wind, except tied to a string at some part of it (usually the left side looks like it's anchored to a string, the right part is fluttering though it rotates).
The clearer the video & the more I watch it, the less I can see anything that suggests anything intelligent (extraterrestrials) or exotic (plasma "critters").
I am leaning more & more towards something that is man made being subjected to the extreme buffeting resulting from the slipstream of that aircraft. My second option is CGI.
[edit on 22-7-2009 by Sam60]
Originally posted by waveguide3
Anyway, here I am again looking at the higher res YouTube movie of Mr Hernandez and
Mr Maussan. What worries me a lot here is the fact that several sections of the video
are repeated with vastly different resolutions.
WG3
Originally posted by free_spirit
Unfortunately your statement is not correct or not valid, there is not a high resolution video on the Internet, what you are seeing is also a recompressed, resized still low resolution converted to flash video by Youtube, maybe just a little bit more clearer that the other one but still not good resolution for anything more than just a review.
If you pretend to present a non professional analysis based on this low resolution recompressed resized etc. version then it will tell us you are an amteur so try again.