reply to post by sickofitall2012
Wow, that web site and that "Dr." is BS. Hardly ANY science was involved.
Although there are known biological effects that can create node lengthening, these could be easily ruled out. It was clear that something
else had happened.
You see that? "There are known biological effects that can create node lengthening."
But then that BS Dr. went on to BS the readers into
thinking it was caused by microwave's because nodes lengthen when you put them in microwaves.
He didn't prove it was caused by microwaves, he just shows that it is possible to do with with microwaves.
Jump to conclusions is what he did.
He also didn't show ANY proof that "these could easily be ruled out, and that it was clear that something else happened".. He totally IGNORED
that part and didn't show ANY EVIDENCE of it.
This is another misleading part;
The authors concluded that the heat (that had made the nodes swell) was electromagnetic in origin.
Heat IS electromagnetic!! So is the heat from the Sun
They are trying to dazzle you with words, and things you don't understand, and it worked!
Not on me though.. Nothing they said was
scientifically backed up, all they did was BS.
--About radiation found in crop circles--
Nobody has proven yet that they actually did find radiation. All I have ever seen were biased web sites that promote crop circles CLAIMING they did,
but do not show ANY soil samples, or ANY actually tests. All of them are hoping that you trust their word.
With that said, they only claim they found radionuclide's
Understanding Groudwater - Page 82
Groudwater contamination by raidoactive substances, known as radionuclides, is almost always a result of naturally occuring radioactive
minerals in rocks.
It is totally plausible that the radionuclide's (radiation) found in the crop circles was from NATURAL contamination of the water used to water the
Not all water is contaminated, so that would explain why not all crop circles have "radiation".
Here is more info;
Radiation is everywhere, including in the soil. Radionuclides become a part of the soil in three ways:
as part of Earth’s original crust (primordial radionuclides)
produced and deposited by cosmic ray interactions (cosmogenic radionuclides)
through man-made releases (man-made radionuclides and activities)
Radiation is everywhere, including the soil!
Transfer of radionuclides to crops in an area of land reclaimed from the sea .
Concentration of Heavy Elements and Radionuclides in Crops Grown on Coal Fly Ash Amended Red
and Black Soils
Uptake of natural radionuclides from irrigation water by crops.
An investigation of radionuclide uptake into food crops grown in soils treated with bauxite mining residues
My point... There is 1000 reasons for "radionuclides" to be found in crops, and crop circles!
-About "magnetic spheres" found in crops--
I'll copy this from a previous post I made in another topic.
Like the "magnetic material" that is found in some crop circles, the "magnetic spheres", those are man-made too. There is a TON of magnetic
material in the soil of Earth, that is one reason Earth is magnetic. When you get big tractors that plow, and till, the soil, the metal machinery that
does the plowing and tilling actually "smooths" the metal bits found in the soil into small sphere looking things.
Kind of like putting rocks in a rock polisher
. But these are magnetic rocks... Go ahead, get a magnet and
put it in the dirt, and take it out, you will find magnetic stuff all over the place. Now do that in soil that farmers plow, and till, every season,
and you got yourself "alien magnetic spheres".
And about the "bent" and "broken" crops, well when you snap or bend the crop like that, or any plant stem, it injures the plant, and the bent part
is the first part to dry out, and die. So it looks "burnt" in that area.
There are 100's of explanations for all the anomalies found in crop circles that people think can only be explained with the "alien theory",
yet nobody ever researches that far! They are quick to come to the conclusion that it is "aliens" because it is easier than researching!
There is far more evidence that crop circles are man-made.
However, since all crop circles in the past are long gone, and nobody documented anything valuable, we can no longer fully prove or disprove THOSE
crop circles. So we must focus on CURRENT crop circles.
All current crop circles are showing definite signs of being man-made simple because of location, their common designs, and many other factors.
There is evidence of man-made in current crop circles, but no proof, YET, because well, nobody these days really cares to even try to prove they are
man-made because everyone who would be willing to prove it already know they are man-made.
[edit on 4-7-2009 by 0nce 0nce]