Originally posted by Quazze
I will play devil's advocate here:
If you don't pay your taxes annually (or quarterly, depending if you are a business owner), then how come so many people go to jail, have to pay
hefty fines, and/or required to pay back taxes?
How come James Brown and Wesley Snipes went to jail and had to pay back taxes if this is not a law requiring them to do so? Even Dionne Warwick and
Sinbad received major fines. These individuals clearly had top-dollar lawyers to defend them in a court of law ... and obviously they were found
guilty.
So I ask, if you are not required to pay taxes, how come a court of law can find a person guilty?
You have to prove it, that's why. Most people have no idea about this and even if they do, they do not know their way around the law, that is the
problem. The Law is physically designed to be confusing, from a thread similar to this a year or so ago, someone posted that the first (standard book
of law for a college) was something like 2 thousand pages, now, there are many volumes, covering something like 50,000 pages (could be exagerated,
this was a fair while ago.)
It all has something to do with proving that Federal law, invalidates consitutional law. Constitutional law for the US, is the 'framework' upon all
other law is modelled, Federal law (Admiralty Law) is based off this, so if aything under federal law, contradicts constitutional law, that it is
automatically wrong.
BUT! You have to prove this and this isn't as simple as finding the offending article, you will have to explain why this pertains to you, your state,
your country.
So point is you can stop paying taxes, AND you can get away with it. But If you don't they will slam you with everything they have, some people have
even been done for treason, although I think that was for a sovereignty case.
EMM
Edit to add: This guy explains why it is a 'private company' better than I can:
The IRS is actually a private collection agency hired by and working for the U.S. Dept of the Treasury as a revenue collection subcontractor.
They are exactly what they say they are A REVENUE COLLECTION SERVICE, not much different than the ones working for Banks that need to collect
outstanding credit card debt. It is no different than Blackwater which is a private contract para-military police force. Do you understand
now?
www.dailypaul.com...
another:
www.apfn.net...
This one seems a bit more balanced:
www.irs.gov...=106508,00.html
The Law: There is a host of constitutional and statutory authority establishing that the Internal Revenue Service is an agency of the United
States. The U.S. Supreme Court stated in Donaldson v. United States, 400 U.S. 517, 534 (1971), "[w]e bear in mind that the Internal Revenue Service
is organized to carry out the broad responsibilities of the Secretary of the Treasury under § 7801(a) of the 1954 Code for the administration and
enforcement of the internal revenue laws."
Pursuant to section 7801, the Secretary of Treasury has full authority to administer and enforce the internal revenue laws and has the power to create
an agency to enforce such laws. Based upon this, the Internal Revenue Service was created. Thus, the Internal Revenue Service is a body established by
"positive law" because it was created through a congressionally mandated power. Moreover, section 7803(a) explicitly provides that there shall be a
Commissioner of Internal Revenue who shall administer and supervise the execution and application of the internal revenue laws.
Relevant Case Law:
Salman v. Dept. of Treasury, 899 F. Supp. 471 (D. Nev. 1995) - The court described Salman's contention that the Internal Revenue Service is not a
government agency of the United States as wholly frivolous and dismissed his claim with prejudice.
Young v. I.R.S., 596 F. Supp. 141 (N.D. Ind. 1984) - The court granted summary judgment in favor of the government, rejecting Young's claim that
the Internal Revenue Service is a private corporation, rather than a government agency.
This is an example of someone losing their case, it seems he didn't do a good enough job. From what I have seen, you have to use the right
perspective to 'box them in'. If you look up claiming 'Sovereignty' from the US, you will find alot on this, there are many threads around here
about it.
[edit on 5-7-2009 by ElectroMagnetic Multivers]
[edit on 5-7-2009 by ElectroMagnetic Multivers]
[edit on 5-7-2009 by ElectroMagnetic Multivers]