Originally posted by zazzafrazz
I avoid videos generally, as they are usually poorly researched and emotive and full of propogannda, I prefer written works if you have any, I will happily read.

zazz

Books are generally outdated before they hit the shelves. The videos I linked to are made with well known experts in their fields of science, archeology, bio genetics, geology etc. Some are University professors....LOL.

I'm begining to think your Ph.D stands for Post-hole-Digger.

Originally posted by grapesofraft
I have a question for you. If the earth is only 6000 years old how then can we see the light from something say 7000 light years away, or 100000 light years away?

I don't know how old the earth is. Do you?

So I cannot answer your question, however, it is possible that light travelled faster in the past, especially at the first moments the Universe came into existence.

Interesting thread. I've noticed that most folks see evolution as yang, and deevolution as yin. "You can't make a cake without breaking eggs."

Evolution, to me, is a very neutral thing that does not see good or bad.

You speak of this kind of evolution...this external evolution of ideas and science(knowledge/math).

I guess it is really just the evolution of science(and it's mountainous textbooks).

If science(what has really evolved) were taken away right now, there would be many a cry baby in the world today.

We have evolved, but into what?

But... after a generation or two, that evolution would wisp away on the wind.

Originally posted by fapython

The perfect example of race mixing is the mexican man, and he is by far not a superiour more evolved being. we have to admit, there are superiour beings and inferiour beings, the White European man is the epitome of superiority. For example, at the beginning of the last centuary the european man had in possession 97% of the world. The British alone had almost 25% and are responsible for over 60% of the inventions. To mix yourself up in the rediculous marxist ideology of everyone being equal is )ust plain folly as it is impossible to make everyone in the world become a full european as we only equate to 9% of the worlds population (within 100 years at the current rate we will be 0.9%) it would mean making the European a lessor race which realistically speaking will lower the human race considerably. Who got man to the moon, who got man deep under the sea, who got man in the sky ? who is really the victim of racism ?. The European male, he of all the peoples of this planet if the most disciminated against. The word racist was made in the former soviet union by the )ew leon trotsky (bronstein) to restrict the free thinking of the russian peoples. Mixing the races together and multiculturalism will destroy society, history shows that a nation with multiple ethnic groups will be unstable and evidently destroy themselves. An example is in this video

And this will show you how we are not evolving but devolving.

The term "Racist" and "Bigot" today is the same as "Witch" and "Heretic" were back in the dark ages, it is )ust a tool to stunt humans

[edit on 4/7/09 by fapython]

I can't believe you said that.

But numbers never lie right? Numbers are like a god nowadays.

Listen. In my experience. People... have their strengths and weaknesses. Is invention good? maybe, partially.. it brings both good and bad with it. Your inventors have succeeded in the arts of finance, invention, engineering. Some "other" inventors have done the same, but I agree not inasmuch as the ones you speak of.

What is success though? In this current world we live in it is obvious, $$$$.

To me this is BS. To me this is a version of success, but not more successful than say the preacher who has led his people out of darkness. Success is about perspective just like anything else.

The human being will never evolve until he realizes that the opinion of his peers is not the measure of success. It is what in his/her own heart determines success that truly matters.

Though I suppose that only people like myself will see that success. The way the world is, success IS only measured by the opinion of peers, and perhaps that's the way it should be, else this would be paradise, and that... would just not do.

[edit on 4-7-2009 by dragonking76]

*Making another thread*

[edit on 4/7/09 by fapython]

*Making another thread*

[edit on 4/7/09 by fapython]

*Making another Thread* Although i shall leave this one with a quote.

"Hitler will emerge from the hatred that surrounds him now as one of the most significant figures who ever lived... He had a mystery about him in the way that he lived and in the manner of his death that will live and grow after him. He had in him the stuff of which legends are made." - John F. Kennedy, President of the United States of America

[edit on 4/7/09 by fapython]

But - i thought we were all made by magic - or what ever the fck you call this stupid random #e ----

I coulden't agree more. Human and animal evolution has usually been directed by forces beyond our control. As important as agriculture and primitive tool making are concerned, true social changes from thier impact would usually take generations, at least.

What has changed so dramaticly? For animals is the destruction of thier ecosystems. While some will cope, I fear most wont. For us, the most profound change since the printing press is the internet. A billion potential people sharing ideas can only produce the most profound, and revealing ideas. The internet will change us like no ther in a 1,000 years.

Just seen this.

Don't mean to be disrespectful, but he's quick isn't he.

Glad to see an eminantly respected fellow endorsing something many have been pointing out for a long time now.

Nice one professor, sir. (Did hope he'd say something about "Intraphasic matter" at some point but nevermind.).

Now i will read the thread etc.