It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
(visit the link for the full news article)
Eric Holder when asked a hypothetical question about a proposed hate crimes bill was told that ministers and whites will not be protected. He went on to say that only traditional victims would be covered.
In other words, it has nothing to do with hate but providing extra laws for special classes of people. I have already explained countless times that if a crime is a crime the person who commits the crime should be prosecuted fully. It doesn’t matter what the person was feeling towards the victim, it’s still wrong. It’s similar to thought crimes at that point.
Originally posted by breakingdradles
What if a black person IS without a doubt racist.
Attacks a white woman while calling her racial slurs the whole time.
He won't be able to be charged for a hate crime??????
Can someone give me one valid reason of why he shouldn't be but
a Mexican attacking a Jew should??!?!???!!!?!?!!??!!!!!?!?!?!?!?!!!?!?!?