It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Attorney General says ministers and whites not protected

page: 1
4

log in

join
share:

posted on Jul, 2 2009 @ 10:46 PM
link   

Attorney General says ministers and whites not protected


www.e xaminer.com

Eric Holder when asked a hypothetical question about a proposed hate crimes bill was told that ministers and whites will not be protected. He went on to say that only traditional victims would be covered.

In other words, it has nothing to do with hate but providing extra laws for special classes of people. I have already explained countless times that if a crime is a crime the person who commits the crime should be prosecuted fully. It doesn’t matter what the person was feeling towards the victim, it’s still wrong. It’s similar to thought crimes at that point.
(visit the link for the full news article)


Related News Links:
freerepublic.com




posted on Jul, 2 2009 @ 10:46 PM
link   
Here we go again with the double standards. The proposed hate crimes bill is only going to protect 'traditional' victims.

I posted previously about how this legislation is going to be used to stifle the First Amendment and shut down conservative talk radio (www.abovetopsecret.com...). The inherent hypocrisy in this legislation is just another glaring reason it should not be signed into law. Contact your states' representatives and tell them to put this in the garbage where it belongs.


TA

www.e xaminer.com
(visit the link for the full news article)



posted on Jul, 2 2009 @ 11:04 PM
link   
Whites have been victimized by affirmative action for 50 years so why aren't we now classed as traditional victims?



posted on Jul, 2 2009 @ 11:14 PM
link   
What if a black person IS without a doubt racist.

Attacks a white woman while calling her racial slurs the whole time.

He won't be able to be charged for a hate crime??????

Can someone give me one valid reason of why he shouldn't be but
a Mexican attacking a Jew should??!?!???!!!?!?!!??!!!!!?!?!?!?!?!!!?!?!?






[edit on 2-7-2009 by breakingdradles]

[edit on 2-7-2009 by breakingdradles]



posted on Jul, 2 2009 @ 11:16 PM
link   
This is disgusting.

I'm also guessing, that they'll help white women, but not white men.

I'm tired of being put down for being white, constantly it seems now.

Whites= Snitches.
White guys can't jump.
White guys can't run.
White people are all crazy.

etc etc etc.

You can stop racism, well the MSM can but they won't.

If MSM didn't make a huge deal about obama being the first black president, and the 1,000s of CNN Black in America episodes, and just treated them like regular people. They'd actually start acting more like it, and quit thinking that they are a special group of individuals who are abused everyday.

Look at this and notice, how we seem to be okay with it, because it's been installed.

We are all people, and once we start realizing it, and work like it, we won't ever achieve it.

A protection bill against hate crimes leaving out white people.

My question... Why?

What harm or upheavel of protests will come if this is done?



posted on Jul, 2 2009 @ 11:18 PM
link   
reply to post by Make Speed Limit 45
 

Good question.
It seems racist to me to give someone a job they aren't qualified to hold solely because of the color of their skin.

reply to post by breakingdradles
 

Another good question. I guess the hypothetical perpetrator wouldn't be given the harsher charges that would be allowed if the shoe were on the other foot.


TA



posted on Jul, 2 2009 @ 11:20 PM
link   

Originally posted by breakingdradles
What if a black person IS without a doubt racist.

Attacks a white woman while calling her racial slurs the whole time.

He won't be able to be charged for a hate crime??????

Can someone give me one valid reason of why he shouldn't be but
a Mexican attacking a Jew should??!?!???!!!?!?!!??!!!!!?!?!?!?!?!!!?!?!?



Actually she probally would be charged if she fought back in anyway, given that any crime involving a black and a white is automaticly a hate crime against the black.

I was layed off years ago (on christmas eve) because the boss decided he wanted to replace the white guys with assians as he didn't have to pay them overtime. He was dumb enough to put that I was being let go because I wasn't assian. I still couldn't get the gov't to do anything because it's not discrimination if it happens to a white male.



posted on Jul, 2 2009 @ 11:25 PM
link   
This doesn't surprise me at all. Obama's nominee for Supreme Court also believes in and supports white based racism. She learned this from her upbringing, and believes it makes her a better person. Just ask her.



posted on Jul, 2 2009 @ 11:26 PM
link   
I had said 20 years ago that there will be a time when, in the USA, preachers will be put in jail/fined for speaking out against homosexuality. Well, this is one preacher who may find himself behind bars.



posted on Jul, 2 2009 @ 11:28 PM
link   
reply to post by Beneia
 


"I disagree with what you have to say but will fight to the death to protect your right to say it." -- Voltaire



posted on Jul, 2 2009 @ 11:38 PM
link   
White people are legislating themselves into oblivion. We have literally allowed political correctness and rampant white guilt to be used as a means to make our own people second class citizens in our own countries.

It never seems to amaze me how gullible and self effacing well meaning whites will become in order to appease those who they have supposedly wronged historically.

Seems as if we are all just supposed to lay down and die, all while apologizing profusely to non whites for the things that happened generations before we were even born.

We are made to bend over backwards to accomodate other ethnic groups of people, many who hate us for no reason other than the color of our white skin. Now isn't that by definition the very meaning of racism?



posted on Jul, 2 2009 @ 11:42 PM
link   
reply to post by BlackOps719
 


Right on, BlackOps719! Couldn't have said it better. We just seem to accept the assertion that we owe other groups of people something just because we happen to have less skin pigmentation than they do. Why that is, is beyond me.


TA



posted on Jul, 2 2009 @ 11:55 PM
link   
Holder needs to be arrested and charged with failing to uphold his oath to support the Constitution.

This retard clearly has no knowledge of the Constitution, nor common sense.



posted on Jul, 2 2009 @ 11:58 PM
link   
reply to post by SurvivalGearDepot
 


I agree. I'm beginning to believe he's a much bigger threat to liberty than any of us (or at least I) thought. This is the second time I've reported on the guy for wanting to run the Constitution through a paper shredder in the last few days. He says we're the ones who need to be watched, I say he's the one we need to be keeping an eye on. One of them, anyway...


TA


[edit on 2-7-2009 by TheAssociate]



posted on Jul, 3 2009 @ 12:02 AM
link   
reply to post by TheAssociate
 


It's hard to believe, but this clown makes Ashcroft and Gonzalez look like innocent little sheep.

Holder is an enemy of freedom.



posted on Jul, 3 2009 @ 12:12 AM
link   
reply to post by SurvivalGearDepot
 


Holder is upholding Obama's revisionist view of the U.S. Constitution he's been working on his entire professional and political career. Obama's next step is to stack the Supreme Court with his revisionist cronies to support all his views. Sotomayor is his first in this step.



posted on Jul, 3 2009 @ 01:09 AM
link   
Seriously as a White Anglo/Saxon male who considers myself as well as every other man, woman and child on the planet regardless of their race, creed, nationality, sex, sexuality, religion or ethnology to be a human being.

Now if some human beings think they are being victimized, well they probably are, first and foremost by themselves.

Now I have a pretty endless list of people who try to victimize me, would like to victimize me, WISH they could victimize me, but it never quite works for them because I just don't see myself as a victim. I simply refuse to be a victim. I refuse to be bested, I refuse to be mistreated, I don't care who says what, how they say it, how they justify it...whether with words, accusations, slanders, laws, badges, or sticks and stones...

Do a good number of the people who have tried to victimize me and couldn't succeed hate me...

Yeah they sure do


Should it be a crime? Nah...

This is one White guy who needs no hate crime protections...I sure for sure for sure can see why all the loosers that have tried to victimize me would feel they need protection from me...

Wow they are relying on their statutes, lawyers, judges, politicians, social aide networks, activists, charities, and such...

I just need my plain old common sense and cool collected intelligence...

I am not an endangered species I need no protection...and for the record, not only do White/Anglos rule the world, we are the ones that wrecked and screwed it all up, and they couldn't stop us then and they aren't going to stop us now...

Flattered that's what I am...

Thanks for remembering guys! Don't forget my Birthday is coming up too!

Hate crime protection lol, what's they world coming to...rents still due on the 1st you whiners!



new topics

top topics



 
4

log in

join